Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 8:1 (1998) ► pp.3–19

Discursive hegemony in the Kennedy Smith rape trial

Evidence of an age graded allusion in expert testimony

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 March 1998
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.8.1.01mat
References
Arminen, Ilkka
(1996) On the moral and interactional relevancy of self-repairs for life stories of members of alcoholics anonymous. Text 16.4: 449-480.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell
(1978) Discovering suicide: Studies in the social organization of sudden death. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko
(1990) Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 419-451. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles
(1984) Learning to ask: Native metacommunicative competence and the incompetence of field workers. Language in Society 13.1: 1-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Button, Graham
(1992) Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in job interviews. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212-231.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, Justine Coupland, & Howard Giles
(1991) anguage, society, and the elderly. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
(1992) Contested evidence in the courtroom: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 470-520.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul & John Heritage
(1992) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-65.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro & Charles Goodwin
(eds.) (1992) Rethinking context. New York: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Editors
(1995) Confronting the new challenges of scientific evidence. Harvard Law Review 1081: 1481-1603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Frederick & Jeffrey Schultz
(1982) The counselor as gatekeeper. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles
(1977) Baby talk as a simplified register. In C. Snow & C. Ferguson (eds.), Talking to children. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209-235.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1994) Transparent vision. American Anthropologist 93.3: 606-633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Charles Goodwin
(1986) Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62.1/2: 51-75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haydock, Roger & John Sonsteng
(1990) Trial theories, tactics, and techniques. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar
Jayyusi, Lena
(1984) Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(1974) Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society 21: 181-199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Carol
(1994) Expert witnesses. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth
(1993) Correction/repair as a resource for co-construction of group competence. Pragmatics 3.4: 411-423.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jenny
(1990/1991) Beyond mundane reason: Conversation analysis and context. Research on language and social interaction 241: 333-350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory
(1993) Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1995) Language, law, and society: Policy implications of the Kennedy Smith rape trial. Law and Society Review 29.4: 669-701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997a) `You were interested in him as a person?’: Rhythms of domination in the Kennedy Smith rape trial. Law and Social Inquiry 22.1: 55-93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997b) `I’m sorry we had to meet under these circumstances’: Verbal artistry (and wizardry) in the Kennedy Smith rape trial. In M. Travers & J. Manzo (eds.), Law in action: Ethnomethodological and conversation analytic approaches to law. London: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Mauet, Thomas
(1996) Trial techniques. 4th. edition. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elisabeth
(1985) Beyond symbolic anthropology: Introducing semiotic mediation. In E. Mertz & R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Language, law, and social meaning: Linguistic/anthropological contributions to the study of law. Law and Society Review 261: 413-45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Linguistic ideology and praxis in U.S. law school classrooms. Pragmatics 3.2: 325-34.Google Scholar
O’Barr, William
(1982) Linguistic evidence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Joseph
(1987) Use of forensic evidence by the police and courts. Research in brief. Washington D.C.: National Institute of Justice, pp. 1-6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Joseph, John Ryan, Pauline Houlden, and Steven Mihajlovic
(1987) The uses and effects of forensic science in the adjudication of felony cases. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32.6: 1730-1753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renoe, Curtis E
(1996) Seeing is believing?: Expert testimony and the construction of interpretative authority in an American trial. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 9.26: 115-137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1992) Lectures on conversation, Vol.1. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saks, Michael & Richard Duizend
(1983) The use of scientific evidence in litigation.Washington, D.C.: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanual
(1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 261-286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson, & Harvey Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 531: 361-382. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
(1981) The limits of awareness. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 84. Austin: Southwest Educational Lab.Google Scholar
(1993) Metapragmatic discourse and the metapragmatic function. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive language. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rod
(1996) Some general reflections on Categorization’ and Sequence’ in the analysis of conversation. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (eds.), Culture in action. Washington D.C.: University Press of America, pp. 49-75.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q
(1997) Moral judgment. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn
(1993) Language ideology: Issues and approaches. Pragmatics 2.3: 235-249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn & Bambi Schieffelin
(1994) Language ideology. In W. Durham, E. Daniel, & B. Schieffelin (eds.), Annual Review of Anthropology. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc., 231: 55-82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Bens, Jonas
2018. The courtroom as an affective arrangement: analysing atmospheres in courtroom ethnography. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 50:3 ► pp. 336 ff. DOI logo
HOBBS, PAMELA
2003. You must say it for him: Reformulating a witness testimony on cross-examination at trial. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 23:4 DOI logo
Jeffries, Lesley
2016. “When did you decide to tell the truth?”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4:2 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Tachino, Tosh
2017. Documenting knowledge mobilization: a quantitative analysis of citation and reported speech in a Canadian public inquiry. Text & Talk 37:6 ► pp. 735 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.