Article published in:
Vol. 8:1 (1998) ► pp. 2145


Computer-mediated communication and scholarly discourse


Baym, N.
(1995) The emergence of community in computer mediated communication. In St. Jones (ed), pp. Cybersociety. Computer-mediated communication and community, 138-164.Google Scholar
Bilmes, J.
(1988) The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society 17: 161-181. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. & St. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collot, M. & N. Belmore
(1996) Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S. Herring (ed), pp. Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, 13-29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DuBartell, D.
(1995) Discourse features of computer-mediated communication: ‘Spoken like’ and ‘written like’. In B. Warvik, S.-K. Tanskanen, & R. Hiltunen (eds), Organization in discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference. Turku: University of Turku, pp. 231-241.Google Scholar
Eklundh, K.S.
(1986) Dialogue processes in computer mediated communication. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, 6.Google Scholar
Garton, L. & B. Wellman
(1995) Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the research literature. Communication Yearbook 18: 434-453.Google Scholar
Gruber, H.
(1996) Streitgespräche. Zur Pragmatik einer Diskursform. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
(1997a) E-mail discussion lists: A new genre of scholarly communication? In Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 60-61: 24-43.Google Scholar
(1997b) Thematische Progression in Internet Diskussionslisten. In R. Weingarten (ed.), Sprachwandel durch den Computer. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 70-93.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1994) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Herring, S.
(1996a) Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in CMC. In Ch. Ess (Ed), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 115-147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996b) Linguistic and critical analysis of computer-mediated communication: Some ethical and scholarly considerations. To appear in Jim Thomas (ed.), The information society. (special issue on “The ethics of fair practices for collecting social science data in cyberspace”) 12/2: 153-168.Google Scholar
(1996c) Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. Herring (ed), pp. Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication, 81-109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (1996) Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jones, St
(ed.) (1995) Cybersociety. Computer-mediated communication and community. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jones, R. & R. Spiro
(1995) Contextualization, cognitive flexibility, and hypertext: The convergence of interpretive theory, cognitive psychology, and advanced information technologies. In S. Star (ed.), The cultures of computing. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 146-158.Google Scholar
Korenman, J. & N. Wyatt
(1996) Group dynamics in an e-mail forum. In S. Herring (ed.), pp. Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, 225-243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, H.
(1993) Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22: 193-216. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lea, M.
. et al. (1992) “Flaming” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (ed.), pp. Contexts of computer-mediated communication, 89-113.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1992) Contexts of computer-mediated communication. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Leech, G. & M. Short
(1981) Style in fiction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Levinson, St
(1984) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marková, I.
(1990) A three-step process as a unit of analysis in dialogue. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 129-147.Google Scholar
Ng, S.H., M. Brooke, & M. Dunne
(1995) Interruption and influence in discussion groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14.4: 369-382. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ng, S.H. & J. Bradac
(1993) Power in language. London: Sage. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ochs-Keenan, E. & B. Schieffelin
(1976) Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversations of children and adults. In Ch.N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 225-385.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In M.J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), pp.57-102.Google Scholar
Reid, E.
(1994) Cultural formations in text-based virtual realities. University of Melbourne: MA-Thesis.
Ruedenberg, L., D. Brenda, & Y. Rosenbaum-Tamari
(1995) Virtual virtuosos: Play and performance at the computer keybord. EJC: Electronic Journal of Communication 5.4: 1995.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, & G. Jefferson
(1974) A simpliest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 697-735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shields, R.
(ed.) (1996) Cultures of Internet. Virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Star, L.
(ed.) (1995) The culture of computing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Uhlirova, L.
(1994) e-mail as a new subvariety of medium and its effects upon the message. In S. Cmerjrkova & F. Stich (eds.), The syntax of sentence and text (Festschrift for F. Danes). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yates, S.
(1996) Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing. In S. Herring (ed.), pp. Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, 29-47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wetzstein, Th
. et al. (1995) Datenreisende. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

No author info given
2016.  In Discourse Topics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 269], Crossref logo
Banks, David
2001. Academic mediation: the functions of an electronic discussion list. ASp :31-33  pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo
Goll, Michaela
2004.  In Soziologie des Cyberspace,  pp. 380 ff. Crossref logo
Goll, Michaela
2008.  In Weltweite Welten,  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
Gruber, Helmut
2017. Quoting and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse. Discourse, Context & Media 20  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gruber, Helmut
2019. Genres, media, and recontextualization practices. Internet Pragmatics 2:1  pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Herring, Susan C.
2019.  In Analyzing Digital Discourse,  pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo
Paakki, Henna, Heidi Vepsäläinen & Antti Salovaara
2021. Disruptive online communication: How asymmetric trolling-like response strategies steer conversation off the track. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 30:3  pp. 425 ff. Crossref logo
Palomares, Nicholas A., James J. Bradac & Kathy Kellermann
2006. Chapter 2: Conversational Topic along a Continuum of Perspectives: Conceptual Issues. Communication Yearbook 30:1  pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
von Münchow, Patricia & Florimond Rakotonoelina
2010. Questions and explanations in French and Anglo-American Usenet newsgroups. Discourse Studies 12:3  pp. 311 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.