Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 9:2 (1999) ► pp.249–280

The inferential gap condition

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 1999
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.2.03bea
References
Ajello, Roberto
(1995) La focalizzazione in Somalo. In R. Ajello & S. Sani (eds.), Scritti linguistici et filologici in onore di Tristano Bolelli. Pisa: Pacini Editore, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix
(1992) Focus constructions in Ewe and Akan: A comparative perspective. In C. Collins & V. Manfredi (eds.), Proceedings of the Kwa comparative syntax workshop, MIT. (= MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 17). Cambridge (Mass.): Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Bearth, Thomas
(1986) Focalisation et antifocus. Tranel 11 (= Actes du 2ème Colloque régional de linguistique, Neuchatel 2–3 oct. 1986), pp. 21–36.  BoP
(1992) Constitutent structure, natural focus hierarchy and focus types in Toura. Folia linguistica 26/1-21: 75–94.Google Scholar
(1995) Sein und Haben. Kuwa na kutokuwa. In G. Miehe et al.. (eds.), Handbuch des Swahili, eh. 13. Köln: Rüdiger Koppe, pp. 207–237.Google Scholar
(1997) Inferential and counter-inferential markers in Swahili dialogue. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 51 (= Swahili Forum IV), pp. 1–22.
(1998a) Focus and Implicature. In S. Cmejrovâ, J. Hoffmannovâ & J. Svëtlâ (eds.), Dialogue Analysis VI. (+ Proceedings of the 6th Conference, Prague 1996.) Tübingen: Niemeyer. (+ Beiträge zur Dialogforschung, Band 16.), pp. 395–405.Google Scholar
(1998b) Space metaphor and global contrastive focus in Tura. In Petr Zima & Vladimir Tax (eds.), Language and location in space and time. Munich/Newcastle: LINCOM Europa, pp. 11–26.Google Scholar
(1998c) Tonalité, déclinaison tonale et structuration du discours - un point de vue comparatif. In G. Quiroz, I. Berthoud, E. Thommen & Ch. Vogel (éds.), Les unités discursives dans l’analyse sémiotique (= TAUSCH vol. 12), Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 73–87.Google Scholar
(1998d) Procédés de cohésion dans le discours. Faits de Langues 11–12 (= Les langues d’Afrique subsaharienne, éd. S. Platiel & R. Kaboré), pp. 145–159. DOI logo
Berg, Jonathan
(1991) The relevant relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 161:411-425. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
(1984) Pragmatic roles in Central Somali narrative discourse. Studies in African Linguistics 151: 1–26.Google Scholar
Boadi, Lawrence
(1974) Focus-marking in Akan. Linguistics 1401: 5–57.Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine
(1995) Cognition and representation in linguistic theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dahle 2
(1989) Interview with M. Gora. Zanzibar. Helsinki Corpus of Swahili. (Compiler: Arvi Hurskainen).Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
(1992) The inferential it is f/zaf-construction and its congeners. Lingua 871: 203–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald P.
(1990) Inferentials. The story of a forgotten evidential. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 151: 1–28.Google Scholar
(1995) The inferential construction. Pragmatics 5.3: 341–364.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997)  ‘Oh, it’s I’m not pretty enough’ Expletive structure and relevance . In A. Ahlgvist & V. Caprovâ (eds.), Dan Do Oide: Essays in Memory of Conn R.O. Cléinigh 1927–1995. Dublin: ITÉ,pp. 115–122.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon
(1989) The theory of functional grammar. Part I: The structure of the clause. (— Functional Grammar Series 9). Dordrecht: Foris.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dik, S., M.E. Hoffmann, J.R. de Jong, S.I. Djiang, H. Stroomer and L. de Vries
(1981) On the typology of focus phenomenon. In T. Hoekstra, H. van der Hulst & M. Moortgat (eds.), Perspectives on Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 41–74.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Firbas, J.
(1974) Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to functional sentence perspective. In F. Danes (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 11–37.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(1990) Syntax. A functional-typological introduction vol.11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorayska, Barbara & Roger Lindsay
(1993) The roots of relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 191: 301–323. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K.
(1994) An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Mechthild Reh
(1983) Diachronie observations on compleltive focus marking in some African languages. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 51: 7–44.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
(1972) Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge (Mass.): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Koranteng, E. Owusu
(1991 [1974]) Guasohantan. Accra: Bureau of Ghanaian Languages.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo
(1973) The structure of the Japanese language (= Current Studies in Linguistics 3). Cambridge (Ma.): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lecarme, Jacqueline
(1991) Focus and somali: Syntaxe et interprétation. Linguistique africaine 71: 33–63.Google Scholar
Lord, Carol
(1973) Serial verbs in transition. Studies in African linguistics 4/31: 269–296.Google Scholar
Moeschler, J. and A. Reboul
(1994) Dictionnaire encyclopédique de pragmatique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Mous, Maarten
(1997) The position of the object in Tunen. In Rose-Marie Déchaine & Victor Manfredi (eds.), Object positions in Benue-Kwa, pp. 123–137.Google Scholar
Perrot, Jean
(1974) Message et apport d’information: À la recherche des structures. Langue française 211: 122–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robert, Stéphane
(1993) Structure et sémantique de la focalisation. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 88/fesc.l: 25–47. DOI logo
Saah, Kofi K.
(1988) Wh-questions in Akan. Journal of West African Languages 18.1: 17–28.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
(1987) The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 251: 511–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) “Theticity” and VS order: A case study. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 48–1/2: 3–27.
Sempé, J.-J. and R. Goscinny
(1964) Joachim a des ennuis. Une aventure du petit Nicolas. Paris: Denoël. (= Collection foHo junior.)Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson
(1995 [1986]) Relevance. Communication and cognition. 2nd edition. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Yelbert, Jonathan E.
(1996) Etude des énoncés comportant se dans la langue akan: Invariance et variations. Thèse, Université de Paris X-Nenterre. (Duplicated).Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Ameka, Felix K.
2010. Information Packaging Constructions in Kwa: Micro-variation and Typology. In Topics in Kwa Syntax [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 78], ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Calude, Andreea S. & Gerald P. Delahunty
2022. Inferentials in spoken English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
DELAHUNTY, GERALD P.
2001. Discourse functions of inferential sentences. Linguistics 39:3 DOI logo
Delahunty, Gerald P. & Laura Gatzkiewicz
2022. On the Spanish inferential construction ser que . Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Hatav, Galia & James Essegbey
2024. Towards a unified account of <em> na </em> in Akan. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 9:1 DOI logo
Kropp Dakubu, M.E.
2010. Review of Aboh & Essegbey (2010): Topics in Kwa syntax. Studies in Language 34:2 ► pp. 442 ff. DOI logo
LAMBRECHT, KNUD
2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39:3 DOI logo
Vydrina, Alexandra
2020. Topicality in Sentence Focus utterances. Studies in Language 44:3 ► pp. 501 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.