Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 9:4 (1999) ► pp.535–565

The organisation of knowledge in British university tutorial discourse

Issues, pedagogic discourse strategies and disciplinary identity

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 December 1999
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.4.06ben
References (43)
Becher, T. (1989) Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Benwell, B. (1996) The discourse of university tutorials. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.
Brown, G. and G. Yule (1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
de Beaugrande, R. and W.U. Dressier (1981) Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Capua, A. and J. Dunham (1993) Strategies in the discourse of advice. Journal of Pragmatics 201: 103–125.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. (1983) Literary theory:An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eggins, S. and D. Slade (1997) Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Guy, J.M. and I. Small (1991) Politics and value in English studies: A discipline in crisis? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1989 2nd ed.) Language, context and text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) 4« introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (1981) On the surface of discourse. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
House-Edmonson, J. (1982) Conversational strategies in German and English dialogues. In G. Nickel and D. Nehls (eds.), Error analysis, contrastive linguistics and second language learning. Heidelberg: J. Groos, pp. 135–150.Google Scholar
Jordan, M.P. (1992) An integrated three-pronged analysis of a fund-raising letter. In W.C. Mann and S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 171–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E.O. and B. Schieffelin (1976) Topic as a discourse notion. In C.N. Lin (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 335–384.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. and D. Tannen (1984) Conversational strategy and metastrategy in a pragmatic theory, the example of Scenes from a Marriage. Semiotica 49.3-4: 323–346.Google Scholar
Lemke, J.L. (1982) Talking physics. Physics Education 171: 263–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longacre, R.E. (1992) The discourse strategy of an appeals letter. In W.C. Mann and S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 109–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, W.C. and S. Thompson (1985) Assertions from discourse structure. Proceedings from the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 245-258).Google Scholar
(1986) Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9.1: 57–90. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(eds.) (1992) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mann, W. C, M.I.M. Matthiessen and S. Thompson (1992) Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In W.C. Mann and S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R. (1992) English text: System and structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: JolmBenjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mercer, N. (1995) The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Meyer, B.J.F (1992) An analysis of a plea for money. In W.C. Mann and S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 79–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.S. (1989) Welcome the crisis! Rethinking learning methods in English studies. Studies in Higher Education 14.1:69-81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogborn, J. (ed.) (1977) Small group teaching in undergraduate science. Higher Education Learning Project (Physics). Heinemann: London.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. (1992) Why? The neglected question in planning for small group discussion. In K. Norman (ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the national oracy project. London: Hodder and Stoughton, pp. 148–155.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1974- orig. 1934) The logic of scientific discovery. London: HutchisonGoogle Scholar
Rogers, G.F.C. (1983) The nature of engineering: A philosophy of technology. London: Macmillan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowell, J.A. and E.R. Cawthorn (1982) Images of science: An empirical study. European Journal of Science Education 4.1:79-94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. and E.A. Schegloff (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 8.4: 289–327. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schwab, J.L. (1964) Structure of the disciplines; meanings and significances. In G.W. Ford and L. Pugno (eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 6–30.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. Mc H. and R.M. Coulthard (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1983) Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Testa, R. (1991) Negotiating stories: Strategic repair in Italian multi-party talk. Pragmatics 1.3: 345–370.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R., L. Forrest, M. Ming Pu and M. Hee Kim (1997) Discourse semantics. In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as structure and process. London: Sage, pp. 63–111.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1977) Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
van Dijk, TA. (1985) Handbook of discourse analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T.A. (1997) Discourse as structure and process. London: Sage.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T.A. and W. Kintsch (1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Winter, E. (1982) Towards a contextual grammar of English: The clause and its place in the definition of sentence. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
(1994) Clause relations as information structure: Two basic text structures in English. In R.M. Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Brown, Annie & Ana Maria Ducasse
2019. An Equal Challenge? Comparing TOEFL iBT™ Speaking Tasks with Academic Speaking Tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly 16:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Mwinlaaru, Isaac Nuokyaa-Ire
2017. Bridging boundaries across genre traditions. Functions of Language 24:3 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Veen, Mario & Anne de la Croix
2016. Collaborative Reflection Under the Microscope: Using Conversation Analysis to Study the Transition From Case Presentation to Discussion in GP Residents' Experience Sharing Sessions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 28:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Seedhouse, Paul
2013. Oral proficiency interviews as varieties of interaction. In Assessing Second Language Pragmatics, ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Stokoe, Elizabeth, Bethan Benwell & Frederick Attenborough
2013. University students managing engagement, preparation, knowledge and achievement: Interactional evidence from institutional, domestic and virtual settings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 2:2 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Attenborough, Frederick Thomas
2011. ‘I don’t f***ing care!’ Marginalia and the (textual) negotiation of an academic identity by university students. Discourse & Communication 5:2 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Kirkham, Sam
2011. Personal style and epistemic stance in classroom discussion. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 20:3 ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Horton-Salway, Mary & Abigail Locke
2010. RETRACTED ‘But you might be damaging your baby’: Constructing choice and risk in labour and childbirth. Feminism & Psychology 20:4 ► pp. 435 ff. DOI logo
Nir, Bracha & Ruth A. Berman
2010. Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics 42:3 ► pp. 744 ff. DOI logo
Horton-Salway, Mary, Jane Montague, Sally Wiggins & Sarah Seymour-Smith
2008. Mapping the components of the telephone conference: an analysis of tutorial talk at a distance learning institution. Discourse Studies 10:6 ► pp. 737 ff. DOI logo
Corts, Daniel P.
2006. Factors characterizing bursts of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Discourse Studies 8:2 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Gibson, Will, Andy Hall & Peter Callery
2006. Topicality and the structure of interactive talk in face‐to‐face seminar discussions: implications for research in distributed learning media. British Educational Research Journal 32:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Taboada, Maite & William C. Mann
2006. Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies 8:3 ► pp. 423 ff. DOI logo
Taboada, Maite & William C. Mann
2006. Applications of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Discourse Studies 8:4 ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo
Anderson, Laurie & Roberta Piazza
2005. Talking about Texts: Production Roles and Literacy Practices in University Seminars in Britain and Italy. In Dialogue within Discourse Communities, ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Benwell, Bethan & Elizabeth H. Stokoe
2002. Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: shifting dynamics and identities. Discourse Studies 4:4 ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.