Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 9:2 (2018) ► pp.175–207

Hedging in political interviewing

When Obama meets the press

| University of Rome Tor Vergata

This study presents an analysis of hedging strategies employed by the former president of the United States, Barack Obama, in political interviewing. Using a discourse-analytic procedure, the study investigates a corpus of 22 press interviews and verifies the presence of hedging-related discursive strategies in the President’s responses. It also identifies four specific interrelated discourse moves: ‘Reformulating the interviewer’s question’, ‘Expanding the scope of the original question sequence’, ‘Switching the time frame of the question context’, ‘Recasting the question reference from specific to general terms’. It is suggested that President Obama manages to avoid explicit responses to questions about controversial issues through hedging strategies, which shift the focus of the interviewer’s question to different interrogative formats, time frames and reference perspectives.

Keywords: discourse analysis, political text, press interviews, mitigation, hedging, Obama
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Aim
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Analytic framework
  • 5.Example of hedging in the Obama press interviews
  • 6.Analysis
    • 6.1Discourse strategies
      • Strategy of indetermination
      • Strategy of camouflage
      • Strategy of subjectivization
      • Strategy of depersonalization
      • Hesitation strategies
      • Evasion strategies
    • 6.2A cautious response style
      • Reformulating the interviewer’s question
      • Expanding the scope of the original question sequence
      • Switching the time frame of the question context
        • Time frame switch to future
        • Time frame switch to past
      • Recasting the question reference from specific to general terms
    • 6.3Further findings
  • 7.Final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 June 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.15030.pon
References

References

Aijmer, Karin and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2003 “The discourse particle well and its equivalents in Swedish and Dutch.” Linguistics 41 (6): 1123–1161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso, Rosa Alonso, María Alonso Alonso, and Laura Torrado Mariñas
2012 “Hedging: An Exploratory Study of Pragmatic Transfer in Nonnative English Readers’ Rhetorical Preferences.” Ibérica 231: 47–64.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
1999 “On mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics 311: 881–909. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
1992 “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Discourse.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1993 “Reformulating the Question: A Device for Answering/Not Answering Questions in News Interviews and Press Conferences. Text 13 (2): 159–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “Answers and Evasions.” Language in Society 30 (3): 403–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clemen, Gudrun
1997 “The Concept of Hedging: Origins, Approaches and Definitions.” In Hedging and Discourse, ed. by Hartmut Schröder and Raija Markkanen, 80–97. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1975 “Hedged Performatives”. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 31, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 187–210. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1999 “What are Discourse Markers?” Journal of Pragmatics 311: 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Hedging in Political Discourse: The 2007 Bush Press Conference.” In Papers from the 2nd International Conference on Political Discourse, ed. by Piotr Cap, 201–213. Warsaw.Google Scholar
2010 “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging.” In New Approaches to Hedging, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Stefan Schneider, 15–34. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübler, Axel
1983 Understatements and Hedges. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1998 Hedging in Scientific Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Marina Bondi
2006 Academic Discourse across Disciplines. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas
1997 “The Discourse Marker Well in the History Of English.” English Language and Linguistics 1(1): 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas, and Sarah Smith
1998 “And people like you know just “wow”: Discourse Markers As Negotiating Strategies.” In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, ed. by Andreas Jucker and Yael Ziv, 171–202. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Stefan Schneider
2010 “Introduction.” In New Approaches to Hedging, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Stefan Schneider, 1–14. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1972 “Hedges: A Study In Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts.” CLS 81: 183–228.Google Scholar
Martín-Butragueño, Pedro
2003 “The Pragmatic Rhetorical Strategy of Hedging in Academic Writing.” Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 01: 57–72.Google Scholar
Müller, Simone
2005 Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
2003 The Linguistics of Political Argument: The Spin-doctor and the Wolf-pack at the White House. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ponterotto, Diane
2014 “The Risks of Uncertainty: Hedging Strategies in Rape Trial Discourse.” Language and Dialogue 4 (1): 93–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen, Joel Frader and Charles Bosk
1982 “On Hedging in Physician-Physician Discourse.” In Linguistics and the Professions, Proceedings of the Second Annual Delaware Symposium on Language Studies, ed. by Robert J. Di Pietro, 83–97. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
1994 “Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical English Written Discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 131: 149–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “ ‘I think that perhaps you should’: A Study of Hedges in Written Scientific Discourse.” The Journal of TESOL France 2 (2): 127–143.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schröder, Hartmut, and Dagmar Zimmer
1997 “Hedging Research in Pragmatics: A Bibliographical Research Guide to Hedging.” In Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, ed. by Raija Markkanen and Hartmut Schröder, 249–271. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sara W. and Andreas H. Jucker
2000 “ Actually and other markers of an apparent discrepancy between propositional attitudes of conversational partners.” In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude, ed. by Gisle Andersen and Thorstein Fretheim, 207–235. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taweel, Abeer Q., Emad M. Saidat, Hussein A. Rafayah, and Ahmad M. Saidat
2011 “Hedging in Political Discourse.” The Linguistics Journal 5 (1): 170–196.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1966 “On the Semantic Structure of English.” In Universals of Language, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 142–217. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zadeh, Lotfi A.
1965 “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control 81, 338–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Islam, Jumayel, Robert E. Mercer, Lu Xiao & Steven High
2022. Tension Analysis in Survivor Interviews: A Computational Approach. Digital Studies / Le champ numérique 12:1 DOI logo
Nikolić, Melina & Maja Nikolić
2022. Multiple hedging in the political interview. Reci Beograd 14:15 ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.