Article published in:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 9:2 (2018) ► pp. 252273
References
Adolphs, Svenja
2006Introducing Electronic Text Analysis. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul
(ed.) 2009Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen
2006Corpus Linguistics Investigating Language Structure and Use. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bunce, Pauline, Robert Phillipson, Vaughan Rapatahana, and Ruanni Tupas
(eds) 2016 “Confronting the Hydra”. Why English? Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byford, Jovan
2015Conspiracy Theories A Critical Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. Suresh
2003Resisting Linguistics Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooke, Monte
2009The Skeptic’s Guide To Conspiracies. Avon, Mass.: Adams Media.Google Scholar
Davies, Alan
1996 “Ironising the Myth of Linguicism”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 161: 485–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ertel, Suitbert
1972 “Erkenntnis und Dogmatismus“ [Insight and dogmatism]. Psychologischer Rundschau 231: 241–269.Google Scholar
1981 “Prägnanztendenzen in Wahrnehmung und Bewußtsein“ [Emerging tendencies in perception and consciousness]. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 31: 107–141.Google Scholar
1985 “Content analysis: An alternative approach to open and closed minds”. High School Journal 68 (4): 229–240.Google Scholar
Jensen, Kim Ebensgaard
2014 “Linguistics and the digital humanities: (computational) corpus linguistics”. Mediekultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 571: 117–136..Google Scholar
Kennedy, Graeme
1998An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Knight, Peter
(ed.) 2003Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopaedia. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
McKenny, John
2003 “A double take on writer’s stance: Content analysis of dogmatism compared with corpus analysis of student essays”. corpus analysis of student essays”. In Luuk Lagerwerf, Wilbert Spooren, and Liesbeth Degand (eds) 2003, Determination of Information and Tenor in Texts: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Discourse. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, Stichting Neerlandistiek. pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
2005 “Content analysis of dogmatism compared with corpus analysis of epistemic stance in student essays”. Information Design Journal + Document Design 13 (1): 40–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, Robert
1992Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007 “Linguistic imperialism: a conspiracy, or a conspiracy of silence?”. Language Policy 61: 377–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Linguistic imperialism Continued. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
2011 “English: from British empire to corporate empire”. Sociolinguistic Studies 5 (3): 441–464.Google Scholar
2016Myths and realities of ‘global’ English. Language Policy. (On line).Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
2004Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard
2004Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Thomas Gries
(eds) 2007Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert Anton
1998Everything is Under Control: Conspiracies, Cults, and Cover-ups. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar