Article published in:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 9:4 (2018) ► pp. 571597
References

References

Bayley, Paul
2004Introduction: The whys and wherefores of analysing parliamentary discourse. In Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse ed. by Paul Bayley, 1–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Lawrence, Elda Weizman, and Anita Fetzer
2015Introduction. In The Dynamics of Political Discourse. Forms and functions of follow-ups ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence Berlin, 1–17. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Michael
2013Reframing the American dream. In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice ed. by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 297–319. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Kate Mayer
1993How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology 14: 651–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2014Analysing Political Speeches. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul A.
2004Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 594 ]
Chovanec, Jan, and Marta Dynel
2015Researching interactional forms and participant structures in public and social media. In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions ed. by Marta Dynel and Jan Chovanec, 1–27. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2002The News Interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
1992Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 470–521. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2014a‘On the Part of Ratified Participants: Ratified Listeners in Multi-Party Interactions’. Brno Studies in English 40 (1): 27–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b‘Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics 73 (11): 37–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Isabella Fairclough
2012Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2006‘“Minister, we will see how the public judges you.”’ Journal of Pragmatics 38 (2): 180–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday/Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
1990He-Said-She-Said. Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut
1993Political language and textual vagueness. Pragmatics 3 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Disagreeing: Sequential placement and internal structure of disagreements in conflict episodes. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 18 (4): 467–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Questions and strategic orientation in verbal conflict sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (12): 1815–1857. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Genres in Political Discourse: The case of the Parliamentary ‘Inaugural Speech’ of Austrian Chancellors. In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice ed. by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 29–73. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015aEstablishing intertextual references in Austrian parliamentary debates. A pilot study. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse. Explorations across contexts and discourse domains, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer, 15–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015bPolicy-oriented argumentation or ironic evaluation: A study of verbal quoting and positioning in Austrian politicians’ parliamentary debate contributions. Discourse Studies, 17 (6): 682–702. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra
1991Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1985Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Handbook of Discourse analysis, ed. by Teun van Dijk, vol. 1, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 595 ]
Heritage, John, and David Greatbatch
1986Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences. American Journal of Sociology 92 (1): 110–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and David Watson
1979Formulations as conversational objects. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 123–163. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Hess-Lüttich, Ernest W. B.
2007(Pseudo-)Argumentation in TV-debates. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (8): 1360–1370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
1996Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse & Society 7 (4): 481–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Josef
2000Textsorten im Bereich politischer Institutionen. In Handbuch der Text- und Gesprächsanalyse, ed. by Gerd Antos, Klaus Brinker, and Sven F. Sager, vol. 2, 1589–1605. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1992Activity types and language. In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James R.
1992English Text. System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter White
2007Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maynard, Donald W.
1985How children start arguments. Language in Society 14 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L.
2015Sequentiality and follow-ups. In The Dynamics of Political Discourse. Forms and functions of follow-ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence Berlin, 17–33. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg
2008Analyzing Interaction in Broadcast Debates. In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyzanowski, 121–145. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2007Nationale Rhetorik in Fest- und Gedenkreden. Eine diskursanalytische Studie zum ‘österreichischen Millennium’ in den Jahren 1946 und 1996. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Edward
2011Enticing a Challengeable in Arguments: Sequence, Epistemics and Preference Organisation. Pragmatics 21 (3): 411–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
2009Uptake and conventionality in illocution. Lódz Papers in Pragmatics 5 (1): 33–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Derek Edwards
2008‘Did you have permission to smash your neighbour’s door?’ Silly questions and their answers in police–suspect interrogations. Discourse Studies 10 (1): 89–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van der Houwen, Fleur and Keun Young Sliedrecht
(eds) 2016The form and function of formulations: co-constructing narratives in institutional settings. Special section of Journal of Pragmatics 105: 55–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1997What is political discourse analysis? In Political Linguistics ed. by Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen, 53–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda
2008Positioning in Media Dialogue: Negotiating Roles in the News Interview. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 596 ]
Weizman, Elda, and Anita Fetzer
(eds) 2015Follow-ups in Political Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2000From Conflict to Consensus? The co-construction of a policy paper. In European Union Discourses on Un/employment ed. by Peter Muntigl, Gilbert Weiss, and Ruth Wodak, 73–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Gruber, Helmut
2019. Staged conflicts in Austrian parliamentary debates. Language and Dialogue 9:1  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.