Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse approaches to evidentiality in Spanish
Edited by Marta Albelda Marco and María Estellés
[Pragmatics and Society 9:3] 2018
► pp. 429–453
Special Issue Section

Evidentials as a mark of genre

A study of four oral and written genres

| University of Valencia

This paper aims to study the different types and pragmatic functions of the Spanish evidential forms found in four discursive genres, in order to observe if any restrictions apply. All the evidentials are studied in a corpus containing 100,000 words, evenly distributed over colloquial conversations, press news, academic papers, and parliamentary debates. Specifically, together with the pragmatic functions of these evidentials, the four dimensions mode of knowing, type of source, accessibility, and degree of precision are analysed. The results reveal different tendencies in the use of evidentials, depending on the genre, and support the claim that the behaviour of evidentials is conditioned by the specific characteristics of each genre.

Keywords: evidentiality, discourse genre, pragmatic functions, Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Parameters of analysis
    • 2.2Corpus
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1Quantitative analysis. Total number of evidential resources in the corpus
    • 3.2Characteristics of evidentials in conversations – Theoretical implications
    • 3.3Characteristics of evidentials in press news – Theoretical implications
    • 3.4Characteristics of evidentials in academic papers – Theoretical implications
    • 3.5Characteristics of evidentials in parliamentary debates – Theoretical implications
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 June 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16035.alb
References

References

Abouda, Lotfi
2001 “Les emplois journalistique, polémique et atténuatif du conditionnel. Un traitement unitaire”. In Le conditionnel en français, ed. by P. Dendale and L. Tasmowski, 277–294. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007 “Information source and evidentiality: what can we conclude?” Rivista di Linguistica 19(1): 209–227.Google Scholar
Albelda, Marta
2016 “La expression de la evidencialidad en ‘se ve (que)’ ”. Spanish in context 13(2): 237–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco
2014 “Evidential and epistemic devices in English and Spanish medical, computing and legal scientific abstracts: A contrastive study”. In Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change, ed. by M. Bondi and R. Lorés, 21–42. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015 “On the mitigating function of modality and evidentiality. Evidence from English and Spanish medical research papers”. Intercultural Pragmatics 12(1): 33–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B.
1986 “Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: typologically regular asymmetries”. In Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, ed. by W. Chafe and J. Nichols, 273–312. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing,Google Scholar
Barros, Pedro et al.
2012  cogila: español oral conversacional. Granada: University of Granada.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, Fernando
2005 Evidencialidad. La codificación lingüística del punto de vista. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Blas, José-Luis
2009 “Interpersonal issues in political discourse”. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by M. Locher and S. L. Graham, 405–434. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2010 “Evidence for what? Evidentiality and scope”. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 63(4): 290–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder
2009 “Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization.” Functions of Language 16(1): 9–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenes, Ester
2010 “Evidencialidad, aserción y (des)cortesía verbal: el receptor como garante de lo dicho”. Español actual 931: 7–28.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio
2001 El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1986 “Evidentiality in English Conversation and academic writing”. In Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, ed. by W. Chafe and J. Nichols, 261–272. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert
2007 Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Spanish (semi)auxiliaries. A Cognitive-functional Approach. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert, and Pedro Gras
2015 “On the interactional dimension of evidentials: The case of the Spanish evidential discourse markers.” Discourse Studies 17(2): 141–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand
2001 “The place of inference within the evidential system”. International Journal of American Linguistics 67(2): 193–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehkordi, Mojdeh, and Hamid Allami
2012 “Evidentiality in Academic Writing”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2(9): 1895–1904. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, and Elena Smirnova
2010 “Introduction. Evidentiality in European languages: the lexical-grammatical distinction. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by G. Diewald and E. Smirnova, 1–14. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estellés, María
2015 “Expressing evidentiality through prosody? Prosodic voicing in reported speech in Spanish colloquial conversations”. Journal of Pragmatics 851: 138–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
this volume). “What genres tell us about evidentials and vice versa: A study of al parecer in Spanish parliamentary debates (1979–2015)”.
Estellés, María, and Marta Albelda
2014 “Evidentials, politeness and prosody in Spanish: A corpus analysis.” Journal of Politeness Research 10 (1): 29–62.Google Scholar
2017 “Evidencialidad, atenuación y descortesía en al parecer y por lo visto. Influencias del género discursivo”. In Gramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad, ed. by B. Cornillie. 169–201. EUNSA: Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
2018 “On the dynamicity of evidential scales. Pragmatic indirectness in evidentiality as a rhetoric strategy in academic and political discourse”. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish, ed. by C. Figueras and A. Cabedo, 25–48. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estrada, Andrea
2008 “¿Reforzador o atenuador? ‘Evidentemente’ como adverbio evidencial”. Sintagma 201: 37–52.Google Scholar
Figueras, Carolina
(2017): “La relevancia de los adverbios evidenciales”. In Gramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad, ed. by B. Cornillie. 129–167. EUNSA: Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
Frawley, William
1992 Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Catalina
2012 “Introduction. ‘Discurso parlamentario y género. Perspectivas de investigación’”. Revista iberoamericana de discurso y sociedad 61: 1–4.Google Scholar
Garrido-Medina, Joaquín
2007 “Construcción de discurso en noticias de prensa”. Revista española de lingüística 371: 139–168.Google Scholar
González-Condom, Montserrat
(ed) 2015 Evidential and espistemic strategies in discourse. A cross-linguistic perspective. Discourse Studies 17(2) (Special Issue).Google Scholar
González-Condom, Montserrat, Paolo Roseano, Joan Borràs-Comes & Pilar Prieto
2017 “Epistemic and evidential textures in discourse: effects of register and debatability”. Lingua 186–7: 68–87.Google Scholar
González-Ramos, Elisa
2005 “ Por lo visto y al parecer: comparación de dos locuciones modales epistémicas de evidencialidad en español actual”. Interlingüística 16(1): 541–554.Google Scholar
Hassler, Gerda
2010 “Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis. The case of Romance languages”. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by G. Diewald and E. Smirnova, 223–247. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hernández-Flores, Nieves
2004 “Politeness as ‘face’ enhancement: an analysis of Spanish conversations between family and friends. In Current trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. by R. Márquez-Reiter and M. Placencia, 265–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2000 Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2001 “Unparliamentary language: insults as cognitive forms of confrontation”. In Language and Ideology, ed. by R. Dirven, R. Frank and C. Ilie, 235–263. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2010 European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotwica, Dorota
2013 “Los valores del significado de la partícula evidencial al parecer: la atenuación y el efecto de disociación”. In Estudios de lingüística: investigaciones, propuestas y aplicaciones, ed. by Adrián Cabedo Nebot, Manuel José Aguilar Ruiz & Elena López-Navarro Vidal, 403–410. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
2015 “Evidential al parecer: Between the physical and the cognitive meaning in Spanish scientific prose of the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries” Journal of Pragmatics 851: 155–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
this volume). “Does the source matter? Specificity in reportative evidentiality in Spanish scientific discourse (1799–1920)”.
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts
2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work”. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour”. In Impoliteness in language. Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, ed. by D. Bousfield and M. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marcos, Mercedes
2005 A propósito del marcador por lo visto . In Palabras, norma, discurso, ed. by Luis Santos Río, Julio Borrego Nieto, Juan Felipe García Santos, José J. Gómez Asencio, and Emilio Prieto de los Mozos, 777–785. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
2006 “Evidencialidad y género discursivo”. In Análisis del discurso: lengua, cultura, valores, ed. by Manuel Casado Velarde, Ramon Gonzalez Ruiz & M.ª Victoria Romero Gualda, 579–592. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana
2004 “Evidential and epistemic qualifications in the discourse of fact and opinion”. In Perspectives on Evidentiality and Modality, ed. by J. Marín-Arrese, 153–184. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana
2001 Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance. Narrative Retelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, Rosa
2011 “La información de sucesos: temática en prensa escrita”. Correspondencias & Análisis 11: 309–325 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
(ed) 2008 “Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian”. Linguistics 46(5): 917–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
1990 Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004 Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vatrican, Axelle
2010 “La modalité et le conditionnel de rumeur en espagnol et en français”. Modèles linguistiques, XXXI(62): 83–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitt, Richard
2011 “(Inter)Subjectivity and evidential perception verbs in English and German”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 347–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Estellés Arguedas, Maria
2020. The Evolution of Parliamentary Debates in Light of the Evolution of Evidentials: Al Parecer and Por lo Visto in 40 Years of Parliamentary Proceedings from Spain. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Uribe Martínez, Liz Maleni
2022. Análisis semántico y pragmático del dequeísmo en El Habla de Monterrey-PRESEEA. Spanish in Context 19:3 ► pp. 432 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.