Article published In:
Discourse approaches to evidentiality in Spanish
Edited by Marta Albelda Marco and María Estellés
[Pragmatics and Society 9:3] 2018
► pp. 429453
References (54)
References
Abouda, Lotfi. 2001. “Les emplois journalistique, polémique et atténuatif du conditionnel. Un traitement unitaire”. In Le conditionnel en français, ed. by P. Dendale and L. Tasmowski, 277–294. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, 2007. “Information source and evidentiality: what can we conclude?Rivista di Linguistica 19(1): 209–227.Google Scholar
Albelda, Marta. 2016. “La expression de la evidencialidad en ‘se ve (que)’ ”. Spanish in context 13(2): 237–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. 2014. “Evidential and epistemic devices in English and Spanish medical, computing and legal scientific abstracts: A contrastive study”. In Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change, ed. by M. Bondi and R. Lorés, 21–42. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2015. “On the mitigating function of modality and evidentiality. Evidence from English and Spanish medical research papers”. Intercultural Pragmatics 12(1): 33–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. “Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: typologically regular asymmetries”. In Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, ed. by W. Chafe and J. Nichols, 273–312. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing,Google Scholar
Barros, Pedro et al. 2012. cogila: español oral conversacional. Granada: University of Granada.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, Fernando. 2005. Evidencialidad. La codificación lingüística del punto de vista. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Blas, José-Luis. 2009. “Interpersonal issues in political discourse”. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by M. Locher and S. L. Graham, 405–434. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper, 2010. “Evidence for what? Evidentiality and scope”. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 63(4): 290–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder. 2009. “Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization.” Functions of Language 16(1): 9–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenes, Ester. 2010. “Evidencialidad, aserción y (des)cortesía verbal: el receptor como garante de lo dicho”. Español actual 931: 7–28.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio. 2001. El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and academic writing”. In Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, ed. by W. Chafe and J. Nichols, 261–272. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Spanish (semi)auxiliaries. A Cognitive-functional Approach. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert, and Pedro Gras. 2015. “On the interactional dimension of evidentials: The case of the Spanish evidential discourse markers.” Discourse Studies 17(2): 141–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand, 2001. “The place of inference within the evidential system”. International Journal of American Linguistics 67(2): 193–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehkordi, Mojdeh, and Hamid Allami. 2012. “Evidentiality in Academic Writing”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2(9): 1895–1904. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, and Elena Smirnova. 2010. “Introduction. Evidentiality in European languages: the lexical-grammatical distinction. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by G. Diewald and E. Smirnova, 1–14. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estellés, María. 2015. “Expressing evidentiality through prosody? Prosodic voicing in reported speech in Spanish colloquial conversations”. Journal of Pragmatics 851: 138–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(this volume). “What genres tell us about evidentials and vice versa: A study of al parecer in Spanish parliamentary debates (1979–2015)”.
Estellés, María, and Marta Albelda. 2014. “Evidentials, politeness and prosody in Spanish: A corpus analysis.” Journal of Politeness Research 10 (1): 29–62.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Evidencialidad, atenuación y descortesía en al parecer y por lo visto. Influencias del género discursivo”. In Gramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad, ed. by B. Cornillie. 169–201. EUNSA: Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
. 2018. “On the dynamicity of evidential scales. Pragmatic indirectness in evidentiality as a rhetoric strategy in academic and political discourse”. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish, ed. by C. Figueras and A. Cabedo, 25–48. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estrada, Andrea. 2008. “¿Reforzador o atenuador? ‘Evidentemente’ como adverbio evidencial”. Sintagma 201: 37–52.Google Scholar
Figueras, Carolina (2017): “La relevancia de los adverbios evidenciales”. In Gramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad, ed. by B. Cornillie. 129–167. EUNSA: Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
Frawley, William. 1992. Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Catalina. 2012. “Introduction. ‘Discurso parlamentario y género. Perspectivas de investigación’”. Revista iberoamericana de discurso y sociedad 61: 1–4.Google Scholar
Garrido-Medina, Joaquín. 2007. “Construcción de discurso en noticias de prensa”. Revista española de lingüística 371: 139–168.Google Scholar
González-Condom, Montserrat (ed). 2015. Evidential and espistemic strategies in discourse. A cross-linguistic perspective. Discourse Studies 17(2) (Special Issue).Google Scholar
González-Condom, Montserrat, Paolo Roseano, Joan Borràs-Comes & Pilar Prieto. 2017. “Epistemic and evidential textures in discourse: effects of register and debatability”. Lingua 186–7: 68–87.Google Scholar
González-Ramos, Elisa. 2005. “ Por lo visto y al parecer: comparación de dos locuciones modales epistémicas de evidencialidad en español actual”. Interlingüística 16(1): 541–554.Google Scholar
Hassler, Gerda. 2010. “Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis. The case of Romance languages”. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by G. Diewald and E. Smirnova, 223–247. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hernández-Flores, Nieves. 2004. “Politeness as ‘face’ enhancement: an analysis of Spanish conversations between family and friends. In Current trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. by R. Márquez-Reiter and M. Placencia, 265–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2001. “Unparliamentary language: insults as cognitive forms of confrontation”. In Language and Ideology, ed. by R. Dirven, R. Frank and C. Ilie, 235–263. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2010. European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotwica, Dorota. 2013. “Los valores del significado de la partícula evidencial al parecer: la atenuación y el efecto de disociación”. In Estudios de lingüística: investigaciones, propuestas y aplicaciones, ed. by Adrián Cabedo Nebot, Manuel José Aguilar Ruiz & Elena López-Navarro Vidal, 403–410. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Evidential al parecer: Between the physical and the cognitive meaning in Spanish scientific prose of the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuriesJournal of Pragmatics 851: 155–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(this volume). “Does the source matter? Specificity in reportative evidentiality in Spanish scientific discourse (1799–1920)”.
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work”. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour”. In Impoliteness in language. Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, ed. by D. Bousfield and M. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marcos, Mercedes. 2005. A propósito del marcador por lo visto . In Palabras, norma, discurso, ed. by Luis Santos Río, Julio Borrego Nieto, Juan Felipe García Santos, José J. Gómez Asencio, and Emilio Prieto de los Mozos, 777–785. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Evidencialidad y género discursivo”. In Análisis del discurso: lengua, cultura, valores, ed. by Manuel Casado Velarde, Ramon Gonzalez Ruiz & M.ª Victoria Romero Gualda, 579–592. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana. 2004. “Evidential and epistemic qualifications in the discourse of fact and opinion”. In Perspectives on Evidentiality and Modality, ed. by J. Marín-Arrese, 153–184. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance. Narrative Retelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, Rosa. 2011. “La información de sucesos: temática en prensa escrita”. Correspondencias & Análisis 11: 309–325 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario (ed). 2008. “Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian”. Linguistics 46(5): 917–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vatrican, Axelle. 2010. “La modalité et le conditionnel de rumeur en espagnol et en français”. Modèles linguistiques, XXXI(62): 83–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitt, Richard. 2011. “(Inter)Subjectivity and evidential perception verbs in English and German”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 347–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Uribe Martínez, Liz Maleni
Estellés Arguedas, Maria
2020. The Evolution of Parliamentary Debates in Light of the Evolution of Evidentials: Al Parecer and Por lo Visto in 40 Years of Parliamentary Proceedings from Spain. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.