Interactional metadiscourse of gender in Persian
The case of conference presentations
The present study sets out to investigate an important aspect of gendered performance, namely, the presence of interactional metadiscourse in conference presentations delivered in Persian. The study pursues two primary objectives: firstly, to compare the quantity and quality of interactional metadiscourse markers as expressed by male and female academics; secondly, to investigate some other factors influencing the phenomenon under investigation. The data include twenty-four conference presentations by twelve males and twelve females. The quantitative analysis showed a statistically significant difference in the use of interactional metadiscourse by male and female presenters. However, the qualitative analysis helped the authors to identify more similarities than differences. In point of fact, such factors as academic status and nativeness had caused the speakers to use different metadiscourse strategies.
Keywords: gender, community of practice, conference presentation, interactional metadiscourse, core and peripheral members, professional identity, academic status
Published online: 14 January 2020
Arundale, Robert B.
Baker, Paul and Giuseppe Balirano[ p. 535 ]
Bergvall, Victoria L.
Chafe, Wallace L.
Crismore, Avon, Raija Markkanen, and Margaret S. Steffensen
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet
Ehlich, Susan, Miriam Meyerhoff, and Janet Holmes
Francis, Becky, Jocelyn Robson and Barbara Read
Holmes, Janet and Miriam Meyerhoff
Hyland, Ken and Polly Tse
Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger
Levon, Erez and Ronald Beline Mendes[ p. 536 ]
Mumby, Dennis K. and Cynthia Stohl
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth and Shirley Carter-Thomas
Simpson, Paul, and Andrea Mayr
Sutton, Laurel A.
Taromi, Tahereh, Giti Taki, and Pakzad Yusifian
. 2018. “Gensiat dar maqalat e’lmi farsizaban: motale’h peikareh-bonyad nashangarhaye fara-goftamanu” [Gender in the Persian scientific articles: A corpus study of metadiscourse markers].” Pazhuashhaye Zabanshanasi [Researches in Linguistics] 10(1): 23–42.
Vande Kopple, William J.
Ventola, Eija, Celia Shalom, and Susan C. Thompson
Zareifard, Raha and Batool Alinezhad[ p. 537 ]