Language, attitudes and party politics
The representation of Republicans and Democrats in Presidential weekly addresses
This study investigates Barack Obama’s attitudes towards Republicans and Democrats by analyzing a corpus of 249 Presidential weekly addresses. Analysis shows that Obama’s attitudes towards the Republicans are characterized by a negative judgment of propriety, creating a negative image of the Republican Party, whereas when Republicans and Democrats are mentioned together, his attitudes are characterized by his hopes for and commendations on bipartisan collaboration. An analytical model based on the attitude schema is proposed to explicate the strategies for encoding attitudes. It is found that negative attitudes are always expressed implicitly by recounting events that elicit the attitudes (i.e. behaviors of the Republicans) and performing speech acts that are motivated by the attitudes (i.e. urging the Republicans to stop the wrong behaviors). The patterns of attitudes reflect bipartisan conflict and cooperation on the one hand, and constitute an important strategy to battle against the opposition party and build coalitions on the other.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Political discourse analysis and studies of Obama’s speeches
- 2.1Political discourse analysis
- 2.2Studies of President Obama’s speeches
- 3.Analytical method: Corpus-based appraisal analysis
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Attitudes towards the Republicans
- 4.2Attitudes towards Republicans and Democrats together
- 4.3Attitudes, power, and party politics
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
References
Bateman, John, and Karl-Heinrich Schmidt
2012 Multimodal Film Analysis: How Films Mean. London: Routledge.
Bednarek, Monica
2006 Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum
Benoit, William
2007 Communication in Political Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.
Bibby, John
2004 “
Political Parties in the United States.”
[URL].
Bilmes, Jack
1999 “
Questions, answers, and the organization of talk in the 1992 Vice Presidential debate: fundamental considerations.”
Research on Language and Social Interaction 32 (3): 213–242.
Biria, Reza, and Azadeh Mohammadi
2012 “
The socio pragmatic functions of inaugural speech: a critical discourse analysis approach.”
Journal of Pragmatics 44 (10): 1290–1302.
Boyd, Michael S.
2009 “
De-constructing race and identity in US Presidential discourse: Barack Obama’s speech on Race
.”
Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 31 (2): 75–94.
Campbell, Karlyn K., and Kathleen H. Jamieson
2008 Presidents Creating the Presidency: Deeds Done in Words. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2005 Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2006 “
Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign.”
Discourse & Society 17 (5): 563–581.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2014 Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Cohen, Jeffrey, and David Nice
2003 The Presidency. New York: McGraw Hill.
Edwards, George C. III, and Dan B. Wood
1999 Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media.
The American Political Science Review, 93(2), 327–344.
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, Norman
1998 “
Political discourse in the media: an analytical framework.” In
Approaches to Media Discourse, ed. by
Allan Bell and
Peter Garrett, 142–162. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
2012 Political Discourse Analysis: A method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
Feng, Dezheng
2012 Modelling Appraisal in Film: A Social Semiotic Approach. PhD Thesis, National University of Singapore.
Feng, Dezheng
2017 “
Ideological dissonance among Chinese newspapers in Hong Kong: a corpus-base analysis of attitude towards Occupy Central Movement.”
Discourse and Communication.
Friedenberg, Robert V.
(ed) 1990 Rhetorical Studies of National Political Debates: 1960–1988. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Gordon, Ann, and Jerry Miller
2004 “
Values and persuasion during the first Bush-Gore Presidential debate.”
Political Communication 21 (1): 1–92.
Graham, Phil, Thomas Keenan, and Anne-Maree Dowd
2004 “
A call to arms at the end of history: a discourse-historical analysis of George W. Bush’s declaration of war on terror.”
Discourse & Society 15 (2–3): 199–221.
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004 Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Horváth, Juraj
2009 “
Critical discourse analysis of Obama’s political discourse.” In
International Conference on Language, Literature and Culture in a Changing Transatlantic World, Prešov, Slovakia, ed. by
Maros Ferenčik, and
Dezsö J. Horváth, 45–56.
Jones, John M., and Robert C. Rowland
2000 “
The weekly radio addresses of President Ronald Reagan.”
Journal of Radio & Audio Media 7 (2): 257–281.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lazarus, Richard
1991 Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marietta, Morgan
2009 “
The absolutist advantage: sacred rhetoric in contemporary Presidential debate.”
Political Communication 26 (4): 388–411.
Martin, James, and Peter White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
McDougal, Serie
2013 “
Framing the black experience: a discourse analysis of President Barack Obama’s speeches.”
The Journal of Pan African Studies 6 (4): 1–17.
Obama, Barack
2009–2014 “
Your Weekly Address.”
[URL]
O’Connell, Daniel C., Sabine Kowal, Edward J. Sabin, John F. Lamia, and Margret Dannevik
2010 “
Start-up rhetoric in eight speeches of Barack Obama.”
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 39 (5): 393–409.
Scacco, Joshua
2011 “
A weekend routine: the functions of the weekly Presidential address from Bill Clinton to Barack Obama.”
Electronic Media & Politics 1 (4): 66–88.
Scott, Mike
2012 WordSmith Tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
Scherer, Klaus R.
1984 “
On the nature and function of emotion: a component process approach.” In
Approaches to Emotion, ed. by
Klaus R. Scherer and
Paul Ekman, 293–318. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Searle, John
1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shayegh, Kamal, and Nesa Nabifar
2012 “
Power in political discourse of Barack Obama.”
Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research 2 (4): 3481–3491.
Sheckels, Theodore F.
2010 “
Place, genre, and polyphony in Barack Obama’s election night address.”
American Behavioral Scientist 54 (4): 394–405.
Shogan, Colleen J.
2006 The Moral Rhetoric of American Presidents. College Station, Tex.: Texas A&M University Press.
Sigelman, Lee, and Cynthia Whissell
2002 “
‘The great communicator’ and ‘the great talker’ on the radio: projecting Presidential personas.”
Presidential Studies Quarterly 32 (1): 137–146.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1995 “
Ideological discourse analysis.” In
New Courant: Special Issue Interdisciplinary Approaches to Discourse Analysis, ed. by
Eija Ventola and
Anna Solin, 135–161. Helsinki: English Department, University of Helsinki.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1997 “
What is political discourse analysis.” In
Political Linguistics, ed. by
Jan Blommaert and
Chris Bulcaen, 11–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2006 “
Discourse and manipulation.”
Discourse & Society 17 (2): 359–383.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2007 “
Discourse & Communication: a new journal to bridge two fields.”
Discourse and Communication 1 (1): 5–7.
Wang, Jiayu
Forthcoming. “
An analysis of the Chinese Communist Party’s discursive and cultural governance.”
Critical Arts.
Wang, Junling
2010 “
A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama’s speeches.”
Journal of Language Teaching and Research 1 (3): 254–261.
Wodak, Ruth
2009 The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zichermann, Sandra
2006 “
Bush’s straight talk erases Kerry’s scholarly chalk. The U.S. Presidential debate of 2004: Who won the image war?”
Semiotica 162 (1–4): 323–339.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.