Article published in:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 11:1 (2020) ► pp. 96123


Arundale, Robert B.
2013 “Face as a research focus in interpersonal pragmatics: Relational and emic perspectives.” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 108–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca
2003 “Face and politeness: new (insights) for old (concepts).” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1453–1469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Rong
1993 “Responding to compliments. A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics 20: 49–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles
1872/1965The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: Appleton; Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dirven, René
2003 “Introduction.” In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, ed. by René Dirven and Ralf Pörings, 1–38. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul, and Wallace V. Friesen
1971 “Constants across culture in the face and emotions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17: 124–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975Unmasking the Face. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul
(ed.) 1982Emotion in the Human Face? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1993 “Facial expressions and emotion.” American Psychologist 48: 384–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2003 “The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions.” In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, ed. by René Dirven and Ralf Pörings, 435–468. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 “On face-work.” In Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, ed. by Erving Goffman, 5–45. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis
1995 “Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in figurative expressions of linguistic action.” In By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective, ed. by Louis Goossens, Paul Pauwels, Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, and Johan Vanparys, 159–174. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 123 ]
2003 “Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic Action.” In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, ed. by René Dirven and Ralf Pörings, 349–378. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gu, Yankui
2003Han Zi Yuan Liu Zi Dian. Beijing: Hua Xia Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo
1990 “Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese.” Pragmatics 14: 237–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Carl Hinze
2003 “A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of ‘face’ and ‘politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1581–1611. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
He, Ming, and Shaojie Zhang
2011 “Re-conceptualizing the Chinese concept of face from a face-sensitive perspective: A case study of a modern Chinese TV drama.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2360–2372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ji, Shaojun
2000 “ ‘Face’ and polite verbal behaviors in Chinese culture. Discussion note.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1059–1062. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labben, Afef
2017 “Revisiting face and identity: Insights from Tunisian culture.” Journal of Pragmatics 108: 98–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1996 “Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self.” In Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, ed. by Gilles Fauconnier & Eve Sweetser, 91–123. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mao, Luming Robert
1994 “Beyond politeness theory: ‘face’ revisited and renewed.” Journal of Pragmatics 21: 451–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Michael, and Felicity O’Dell
2006English Collocations in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, Todd
2009From Attention to Meaning: Explorations in Semiotics, Linguistics, and Rhetoric. New York: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Driscoll, Jim
2007 “Brown & Levinson’s face: How it can – and – can’t help us to understand interaction across cultures.” Intercultural Pragmatics 4(4): 463–492.Google Scholar
Roeckelein, Jon E.
1998Dictionary of Theories, Laws, and Concepts in Psychology. Westport, Connecticut & London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Sheng, Ping
1992Xue Sheng Ci Yuan (Student’s Dictionary of Chinese Etymology). Beijing: China Ocean Press.Google Scholar
Strazny, Philipp
2005Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
Yu, Ning
2001 “What does our face mean to us?Pragmatics & Cognition 9 (1): 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 124 ]