Article published In:
Pragmatics and SocietyVol. 11:1 (2020) ► pp.24–44
What makes a good story?
Exemplification and explication of salient linguistic characteristics in a narrative preferred by the majority of a Danish population
People do things with words, but words also touch people. Aiming to analyze socially preferable linguistic characteristics, the present study exemplifies and explicates the text-linguistically salient characteristics in a narrative most frequently evaluated as ‘appropriate’ by the majority of a Danish population. Asked what is appropriate or inappropriate in a narrative context, the background population repeatedly explained “coherence”, “fiction” and “details” as contextually appropriate (Appendix 1). Salient in the preferred narrative was the use of co-textual enhancement, in which one clause enhances the meaning of another one by qualifying it in various ways. In particular, meaning was enhanced by having cause and effect rationally explicated by subordinating specifications prompting coherence, cohesion, and details. Additionally, a considerable level of social realism was salient in this narrative, while the background population’s preference for fiction may allude to the socio-contextual recognizability that made the narrative easily imaginable as a possible world.
Keywords: narratives, coherence, cohesion, social preference, social stigma, first episode schizophrenia, text linguistics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and the larger context of the present study
- 2.Empirical data
- 3.Introduction to The Preferred Narrative: “coherence”, “fiction” and “details”
- 3.1Causal meaning enhancement
- 4.Reflections on the nature of causality: The difference that makes a difference?
- Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Albeck, Ulla
1939 Dansk stilistik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
Aristotle
1958 Poetik. P. Helms (trans). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.
Beaugrande, Robert-Alain de, and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler
1981 Introduction to Text Linguistics. London & New York: Longman. 
Diderichsen, Paul
1964 Sproget, virkeligheden, fantasien. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
Dijk, Teun van, and Walter Kintsch
1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Gallagher, Shaun
2013 “Phenomenology and experimental design: Toward a phenomenologically enlightened experimental science.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 101: 85–99.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English. English Language Series. London & New York: Longman.
Halliday, Michael A. K.
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar ed. by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Hodder Arnold.
Hansen, Erik and Lars Heltoft
2011 Grammatik over det danske sprog. Copenhagen: Det danske sprog og litteraturselskab.
Iser, Wolfgang
1971 “Indeterminacy and the Reader’s Response in Prose Fiction”. In Aspects of Narrative. English Institute Essays, ed. by J. Hillis Miller, 1–45. New York: Columbia University Press.
1975 Die Appellstruktur der Texte. Rezeptionsästhetik. Theorie und Praxis, ed. by Rainer Warning. 228–252. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Lagerlöf, Selma
1956 Gösta Berlings saga. I. Falbe-Hansen (trans). Copenhagen: Gyldendal [1891].
Lundquist, Lita
2003a “Tekstlingvistik”. In Sprog og Sprogbeskrivelse ed. by Michael Herslund and Bente Lihn Jensen, 227–254. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
1988 “Tekstlingvistik: regelmæssigheder og love”. Hermes. Journal of Language and Communication in Business 1(8):85–96.
Mayer, Mercer
1969 Frog – Where Are You? New York: Dial Press.
Nølke, Henning
2008 “Argumentationsanalyse. Grundtræk af en modulær sprogvidenskabelig tilgang”. Hermes. Tidsskrift for sprogforskning 211: 15–38.
Nølke, Henning & Michel Olsen
2000 “Noter om lingvistisk og litterær polyfoni og MAIS hos Flaubert”. The Electronic Journal of Combinatories 21: 1–38.
Onions, Charles T.
1974 The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology ed. by Charles Onions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parnas, Josef
2012 “The core Gestalt of schizophrenia”. World Psychiatry 111: 67–69.
Petersen, Charlotte
2011 Attitude i sproget ved tidlige skizofrene tilstande. Empirisk undersøgelse af sprogbrugen hos prodromale, førstegangsindlagte og yngre patienter med flere indlæggelser Roskilde: Roskilde University.
2017 “Exploring a lay Gestalt of schizophrenia? A Danish background population’s explanations on why and how first-episode schizophrenia patients’ narratives were intuitively sensed as contextually inappropriate”. Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology 5(2): 64–76.
. (submitted 2018) Pragmatic meaning and pragmatic markers in early schizophrenia. An empirical study on social sensitivity to contextual inappropriateness in narratives from first episode schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.
Skafte Jensen, Eva
2006 “‘Egentlig’ og ‘faktisk’ og to slags spørgsmål polyfoniteoretisk anskuet”. Sproglig polyfoni. Arbejdspapirer 61: 27–52.
Sass, Louis
Madness and Modernism. Insanity in the Light of Modern Art, Literature, and Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Searle, John
1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Therkelsen, Rita
1995: “Tid og tempus”. In 5. møde om udforskningen af dansk sprog ed. by Mette Kunøe and Erik Vive Larsen. 266–277.
Ulbæk, Ib
2003 “Ikonicitet og plausibilitet i tekstforståelse”. In Copenhagen Working Papers in LSP. Tekster: struktur, forløb og forståelse. Tre tekst- og psykolingvistiske undersøgelser. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
Urfer-Parnas, Annich, Erik L. Mortensen, and Josef Parnas
2010 “Core of schizophrenia: Estrangement, dementia or neurocognitive disorder?”. Psychopathology 431:300–311.
WHO
1994 ICD-10. Psykiske lidelser og adfærdsmæssige forstyrrelser. Klassifikation og dia-gnostiske kriterier. 1st edition (10th revision 2003). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.