Vol. 11:1 (2020) ► pp.124–148
When lying is more than deceiving
A pragmatic study of lying, based on the relevance-adaptation model
Lying is a common but controversial verbal phenomenon in human society. This paper aims to uncover the motivation and mechanism of lying as regards its definition, classification and operation by analyzing both the speaker’s production and the addressee’s interpretation process. The Relevance-Adaptation Model is adopted as its theoretical framework. Lying cases, retrieved from an American TV drama Lie to Me, are analyzed from different perspectives to provide concrete evidence for the theoretical assumptions.
The findings are two-fold: Theoretically, this paper formulates a working diagram of the Relevance-Adaptation Model with some modifications to the original to be better applied to the field of lying. Empirically, it supports the claim that the presumption of relevance motivates both the speaker and the addressee to lie or to process lying in the first place. Then, both communicators will enter a relevance-adaptation phase through making structural choices inter-adapt with relevant contextual correlates. An optimal lie is one which is maximally relevant and maximally adapted to the context to benefit the speaker and/or the addressee.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Definition and classification of lying
- 2.2Previous pragmatic studies of lying
- 3.Theoretical framework
- 3.1Rationale for using a relevance-adaptation model
- 3.1.1Relevance Theory and verbal communication
- 3.1.2Adaptation Theory and verbal communication
- 3.2Key notions of the relevance-adaptation model
- 3.1Rationale for using a relevance-adaptation model
- 4.Analyses of lying using the relevance-adaptation model
- 4.1Methodology and data collection
- 4.2Operational definition and classification of lying following the relevance-adaptation model
- 4.2.1Operational definition of lying
- 4.2.2Operational classification of lying
- 4.3Analysis of lie production under the relevance-adaptation model
- 4.3.1Motivation for choosing lying as a communicative strategy
- 4.3.2Structural choices in producing lies
- 4.3.3Contextual adaptation to structure
- 4.4Analysis of lie interpretation in the relevance-adaptation model
- 4.4.1Motivation for the addressee’s processing efforts
- 4.4.2Contextual construction for lying interpretation
- 4.4.3Addressee’s choice of interpretation
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.17021.li