Article published In:
Pragmatics and SocietyVol. 9:2 (2018) ► pp.208–231
Why did Trump say “I hope you will let Flynn go” to Comey?
Pragmemes and socio-pragmatics (A Strawsonian analysis)
In this paper, we analyse and discuss an utterance/pragmeme/pract proffered by US President Donald Trump and addressed to FBI Director Comey: ‘I hope you will let Flynn go’. [1] 1 We consider the explicature of this utterance (‘I hope you will drop the Russian investigation concerning Flynn’) and its illocutionary and perlocutionary effects. We argue that while Republicans opt for an Austinian or Searlean analysis, in the attempt to deny that this utterance constituted an attempt to influence Comey, there are reasons for adopting a Strawsonian analysis, casting it in the framework of pragmemes, devised by Mey (2001), that frame a socio-pragmatic analysis of utterance interpretation within context. This analysis shows, Trump illicitly tried to persuade Comey to drop the Russian investigation, and therefore attempted to interfere with the judiciary system. A reasoned case can be made for saying that Trump had the intention of interfering with America’s federal court system through this utterance.
Keywords: political discourse, pragmatics and law, speech acts, pragmemes, pragmatic underdetermination
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The focus of this paper
- 3.Pragmemes: An alternative to Searle’s speech act theory
- 4.Trump versus Comey
- 5.Denying the speech act of requesting
- 6.Corroborating views by Tannen (2017)
- 7.What the notion of agency has to tell us about this case
- 8.Actively looking for context
- 9.An alternative account
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
References
Allan, Keith, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes
eds. 2016 Pragmemes and theories of language use. Cham: Springer. 
Atlas, Jay
2005 Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy, Implicature, and their Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Austin, John L.
1975 How to do things with words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Camp, Elisabeth
Capone, Alessandro
2005 Pragmemes. Journal of Pragmatics 371:1355–1371.
2009 Are explicatures cancellable? Toward a theory of the speaker’s intentionality. Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (1):55–83.
2013 Explicatures are not cancellable. In Alessandro Capone, Francesco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, eds. Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics. Cham: Springer, 131–151.
2016a The pragmatics of indirect reports. Cham: Springer.
2016b
Introduction to allan, Capone and Kecskes, eds. 2016 Cham: Springer.
Capone, Alessandro, and Francesca Poggi
eds. 2016 Pragmatics and Law: Philosophical perspectives. Cham: Springer.
CNN
Danner, Chas
2017 (June 11) Donald Trump Jr. may have accidentally confirmed part of Comey’s testimony. NYMag.com. Retrieved July 29, 2017 [URL]
Donnellan, Keith S.
1966 Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 751: 281–304.
Editorial Board
June 8, 2017 James Comey and the fear of being alone with Donald Trump. The New York Times. Retrieved July 29 from [URL]
June 8, 2017 Mr. Comey and all the President’s lies. The New York Times. Retrieved July 29 from [URL]
Geis, Michael L.
1995 Speech acts and conversational interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, Ervin
1981 Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goldberg, Sanford
2015 Assertion: On the philosophical significance of assertoric speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Helmreich, Jeffrey
2017 Personal communication.
Horn, Laurence R.
1989 A natural history of negation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Jaszczolt, Kasia
2016 Meaning in linguistic interaction: Semantics, metasemantics, philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kecskes, Istvan
2013 Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kissine, Michail
2013 From utterances to speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2000 Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mey, Jacob L.
2001 Pragmatics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (Second edition)
Peacocke, Christopher
2014 The mirror of the world: Subjects, consciousness, and self-consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poggi, Francesca, and Alessandro Capone
eds. 2016 Pragmatics and law: Practical and theoretical perspectives. Cham: Springer.
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strawson, Peter
1964 Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review 73/4: 439–460.
Tannen, Deborah
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. “Those Are Your Words, not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 99 ff. 
Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
2021. “Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment. Argumentation 35:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Butler, Brian E.
2019. Capone, Bucca, Warner and Llewellyn on Pragmemes and “I hope You Will Let Flynn Go”. In Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 20], ► pp. 587 ff.
Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh
2020. CDA/CDS and Its Interdisciplinary Connections. In Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 26], ► pp. 247 ff.
Tseng, Ming-Yu & Grace Zhang
2018. Pragmeme, adaptability, and elasticity in online medical consultations. Journal of Pragmatics 137 ► pp. 40 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.