Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 11:4 (2020) ► pp.591614
Antaki, Charles. C.
2011Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, Carl
2009Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berenst, Jan
2011Samenwerken en taalvaardigheid. Samenwerkend leren als werkvorm voor de stimulering van de mondelinge en schriftelijke taalvaardigheid van basisschoolkinderen. Raak-PRO projectvoorstel. [Cooperation and Language Proficiency. Collaborative learning as a practice for promoting children’s oral and written language proficiency in primary school. Raak-Pro Research Proposal. Leeuwarden: NHL University of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
Braam, Hilde M.
2015Voorstellen en reacties tijdens peer-interactie in de midden- en bovenbouw van het primair onderwijs. [Proposals and responses during peer interaction in primary education] (Unpublished Master ‘s thesis). University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Braam, Hilde M., Maaike Pulles, & Jan Berenst
2015Bibliotheek in de les. Werken aan leesmotivatie en informatievaardigheden bij wereldoriëntatie. Onderzoeksverslag. [Library in the lesson. Working on reading motivation and information literacy in cultural-historical subjects. Research report] Leeuwarden: NHL University of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics 24(3): 623–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
2013Turn design. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 131–149). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson
Heritage, John
2012Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke
1987Establishing agreement. An analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences. Ph.D diss., University of Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howe, Christine
2010Peer dialogue and cognitive development. A two-way relationship? In Karen Littleton & Christine Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues. Understanding and promoting productive interaction. (pp. 32–47). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1984Transcript Notation. In John M. Atkinson and John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. ix–xvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
1994Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13(1): 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1992Activity types and language. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 66–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1979).Google Scholar
2013Action formation and ascription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 101–130). Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littleton, Karen, & Lucinda Kerawalla
2012Trajectories of inquiry learning. In Karen Littleton, Eileen Scanlon & Mike Sharples (Eds.), Orchestrating inquiry learning (pp. 31–47). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maine, Fiona
2013How children talk together to make meaning from texts: A dialogic perspective on reading comprehension strategies. Literacy, 47(3), 150–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Dialogic readers. Children talking and thinking together about visual texts. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harry
2008Inleiding in de conversatieanalyse. [Introduction to Conversation Analysis] Bussum, The Netherlands: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Melander, Helen & Fritjof Sahlström
2009In tow of the blue whale. Learning as interactional changes in topical orientation. Journal of Pragmatics 411, 1519–1537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Neil
1995Guided construction of knowledge. Talk amongst teachers and learner. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mikkola, Piia & Esa Lehtinen
2014Initiating activity shifts through use of appraisal forms as material objects during performance appraisal interviews. In Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann & Mirka Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp. 57–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. Karen, Ian A. G. Wilkinson, Anna O. Soter, Maeghan N. Hennessey & John F. Alexander
2009Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3): 740–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann & Mirka Rauniomaa
Nystrand, Martin
2006Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4): 392–412.Google Scholar
Palincsar, Annemarie S., Ann L. Brown & Suzanne M. Martin
1987Peer interaction in reading comprehension instruction. Educational Psychologist 22(3): 231–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojas-Drummond, Sylvia, Nancy Mazón, Karen Littleton & Maricela Vélez
2012Developing reading comprehension through collaborative learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(2): 138–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojas-Drummond, Sylvia, Fiona Maine, Mariana Alarcón, Ana L. Trigo, Maria J. Barrea, Nancy Mazón, Maricela Vélez & Riikka Hoffman
2017Dialogic literacy: Talking, reading and writing among primary school children. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 121:45–62, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Volume 11. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2012Establishing joint decisions in a dyad. Discourse Studies 14(6): 779–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa & Anssi Peräkylä
2012Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3): 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Jack Sidnell
2016Proposals for activity collaboration. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(2): 148–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, Jan
2012The agenda as resource for topic introduction in workplace meetings. Discourse Studies 14(1): 53–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ten Have, Paul
2007Doing conversation analysis (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, Kris
2000Does negotiation of meaning promote reading comprehension? A study of multilingual primary school classes. Reading Research Quarterly 35(3): 426–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsweer, Albert P.
2015Ruimte voor leren. [Space for Learning] Groningen/Leeuwarden: Ph.D diss. University of Groningen/NHL University of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
Wegerif, Rupert
2013Dialogic: Education for the internet age. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weilenmann, Alexandra & Gustav Lymer
2014Incidental and essential objects in interaction. paper documents in journalistic work. In Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann & Mirka Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp. 319–335). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
West, Donna
2012Indexical reference to absent objects. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 6(1): 280–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Pulles, Maaike, Jan Berenst, Tom Koole & Kees de Glopper
2021. Text formulations as practices of demonstrating understanding in dialogic reading. Text & Talk 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.