Efficiency in shaping grammars
The case of multiple occurrences of the Chinese reflexive ziji
Hawkins (
1994,
1999,
2004,
2014a) proposes a performance-grammar correspondence hypothesis, claiming that grammars can be shaped by processing systems with reference to the degree of preference in communication. Given that Hawkins’s proposal mainly highlights the role of efficiency in language comprehension, this paper demonstrates that parsing principles can also be employed to account for language production. Based on an analysis of the production mechanism behind multiple occurrences of the Chinese reflexive
ziji ‘self’ in a single clause, it shows that the notion of intersubjectivity can sometimes play a significant role in sentence planning, in the sense that the Chinese reflexive assists speakers to produce an utterance in line with the principle of efficiency, which will in turn help hearers compute the intended meaning by identifying potential referents.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The performance-grammar correspondence hypothesis
- 3.Principles of language production
- 4.A production-based account
- 4.1A production account of multiple zijis
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
References (46)
References
Arnold, Jennifer, Janet Eisenband, Sarah Brown-Schmidt and John Trueswell. 2000. “The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking”. Cognition 761: B13–B26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, Joan, Shipar Dingare and Christopher D. Manning. 2001. “Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: voice and person in English and Lummi”. In Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, ed. by M. Butt and T. H. King, 13–32. Stanford: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blake, Barry. 2004. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breban, Tine. 2010. English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammaticalized Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah and Michael Tanenhaus. 2008. “Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach”. Cognitive Science 321: 643–684. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carroll, Peter John. 1976. Kunwinjku (Gunwinggu): A language of Western Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian National University master’s thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, Albert and Frederick Chang. 1983. Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents. Memory & Cognition 111: 283–294. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Pinedo-Garcia, Manuel and Jason Nobel. 2008. “Beyond persons: extending the personal/subpersonal distinction to non-rational animals and artificial agents”. Biology and Philosophy 231: 87–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dennett, Daniel. 1986. Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. 1985. “Competing motivations”. In Iconicity in Syntax, ed. by J. Haiman, 343–365. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferreira, Victor and Robert Slevc. 2007. “Grammatical encoding”. In The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ed. by Gareth Gaskell, 453–470. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filimonova, Elena. 1999. Universal’nye anomalii lichnyx mestoimenij [Universal Anomalies of Personal Pronouns]. Doctoral dissertation, Moscow State University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filimonova, Elena. 2002. “Person hierarchy and its implications: The case of Aymara”. In Current Studies on South American Languages [
Indigenous Languages of Latin America, 3], ed. by M. Crevels, S. van de Kerke, S. Meira & H. van der Voort, Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and American Studies (CNWS) 199–213.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles. 1975. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, Janet D. 1978. “Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations”. Linguistic Inquiry 91: 427–473.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gabelentz, Georg von der. 1901. Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: C. H. Tauchnitz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. “Explaining article-possessor complementarity: Economic motivation in noun phrase syntax”. Language 751: 227–243. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A. 1999. “Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars”. Language 751: 244–285. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A. 2014a. Crosslinguistic Variation and Efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A. 2014b. “Patterns in competing motivations and the interaction of principles”. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ed. by B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov and E. Moravcsik, 54–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T. James, Audrey Y-H. Li and Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keenan, Edward and Bernard Comrie. 1977. “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 63–99.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirby, Simon. 1999. Function, selection and innateness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koyama, Wataru. 2009. “Indexically anchored onto the deictic center of discourse: Grammar, sociocultural interaction, and ‘emancipatory pragmatics’”. Journal of Pragmatics 411: 79–92. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Xiaoqian and Xiaolin Zhou. 2010. “Who is ziji? ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun during sentence comprehension”. Brain Research 13311: 96–104. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, Brian, Andrej Malchukov and Edith Moravcsik (Eds.). 2014. Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moravcsik, Edith. 2014. “Introduction”. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ed. by B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov and E. Moravcsik, 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDaniel, Dana, Cecile Mckee, Wayne Cowart and Merrill Garret. 2015. “The role of the language production system in shaping grammars”. Language 911: 415–441. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mitkov, Ruslan. 2002. Anaphora Resolution. London: Pearson Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pan, Haihua. 1997. Constraints on Reflexivization in Mandarin Chinese. New York: Garland Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollard, Carl and Ping Xue. 1998. “Chinese reflexive ziji: syntactic reflexives vs. nonsyntactic reflexives”. Jounal of East Asian Linguistics 71: 287–318. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shuai, Lan, Tao Gong and Yicheng Wu. 2013. “Who is who? Interpretation of multiple occurrences of the Chinese reflexives: evidence from real-time sentence processing”. PLOS ONE 8(9): e73226. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanenhaus, Michael, Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton, Kathleen M. Eberhand and Julie C. Sedivy. 1995. “Intergration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension”. Science 2681: 1632–1634. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Wal, Jenneke. 2015. “Information structure, (inter)subjectivity and objectification”. Journal of Linguistics 511: 425–464. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xue, Ping, Carl Pollard and Ivan A. Sag. 1994. “A new perspective on Chinese reflexive ziji
”. In Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 432–477. Stanford: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Xiaolong and Yicheng Wu. 2015. “Whether or not multiple occurrences of ziji can take distinct antecedents: A deictic perspective”. Journal of Pragmatics 871: 142–155. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)