Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 12:3 (2021) ► pp.461–487

Taking an authorial stance in English and Arabic research article discussions

| Shaqra University

Taking an authorial stance is essential in academic writing but remains a challenge for novice researchers, especially EFL/ESL writers. This study explores how authors of English and Arabic research article discussions employ evaluative language resources while commenting on their results. To this end, the study investigated the employment of Engagement resources within Appraisal Theory (Martin & White 2005). The findings exhibited a great divergence between the two language groups as Arabic discussions relied more on Contracting strategies, which indicate the tendency to close down the space for dialogic alternatives, while their English counterparts preferred Expanding resources, which open up the dialogic space for alternative voices. The study, therefore, bears some pedagogical implications for L2 learners.

Keywords: authorial stance, academic writing, appraisal theory, CARS model, Arabic
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The theoretical framework
    • 2.1The CARS model
    • 2.2Appraisal theory
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data collection
    • 3.2Analytical framework
    • 3.3Procedure of data coding and analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Step 1: Interpreting results
    • 4.2Step 2: Comparing results with literature
    • 4.3Step 3: Accounting for results
    • 4.4Step 4: Evaluating results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 5 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18044.alo
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1981 The Dialogic Imagination. (translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Peichin and Mary Schleppegrell
2011 Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 101, 140–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Fei-Wen and Len Unsworth
2016 Stance-taking as negotiating academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussion sections. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 241, 43–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basturkmen, Helen
2009 Commenting on results in published research articles and master’s dissertations in language teaching. English for Academic Purposes 8(4): 241–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. English for Academic Purposes 11(2): 134–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006 Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51: 97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geng, Yifan and Sue Wharton
2016 Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers. English for Academic Purposes 221: 80–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hood, Susan
2004 Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Sydney: Faculty of Education, University of Technology.Google Scholar
2010 Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005 Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le, Thi and Michael Harrington
2015 Phraseology used to comment on results in the Discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes 391: 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loi, Chek-Kim, Jason Miin-Hwa Lim and Sue Wharton
2016 Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions: International publications versus local publications, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 211: 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose
2003 Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. and Peter White
2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Najjar, Hasan
1990 Arabic as a research language: The case of the agricultural sciences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Swales, John
1990 Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge & Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004 Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xie, Jianping
2016 Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English major MA theses literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 231: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Ruiying and Desmond Allison
2003 Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 22(4): 365–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar