Article published in:Hate speech: Definitions, interpretations and practices
Edited by Fabienne H. Baider, Sharon Millar and Stavros Assimakopoulos
[Pragmatics and Society 11:2] 2020
► pp. 241–261
The use of hyperlinking as evidential practice in Danish online hate speech
Using data from readers’ comments to news articles from a national Danish newspaper, the article addresses the nature and function of hyperlinks as evidential practice in relation to xenophobic hate speech. Hyperlinks refer to the use of URL addresses to link to websites; hate speech is understood broadly as stigmatising discourse. Adopting a discursive approach to evidentiality that accounts for a range of phenomena including source of knowledge, participant roles, epistemic stance and interactional force, hate speech related hyperlinks and their evidential functions were identified. While not prevalent in number, hyperlinks serve to legitimise negative stances towards minority groups but also support counter speech targeting prejudicial views. Links can be used as part of processes of metaphorical shift and sarcasm as well as to provoke hate speech in comment threads. As URL addresses are frequently textual, they can have evidential functions independent of the material that they link to.
- 2.The discursive approach to evidentiality
- 3.Data and method
- 4.Hyperlinks related to hate speech
- 5.Evidential functions of hyperlinks
- 5.1From legislation to impalement
- 5.3Same link, different functions
- 5.4Counter speech
- 6.Discussion and concluding remarks
Published online: 13 July 2020
Ackland, Robert, Rachel Gibson, Wainer Lusoli, and Stephen Ward
Ackland, Robert, and Rachel Gibson
2016 “Love Britain? Vote UKIP! The Pragmatics of Electoral Tweets during the European Elections 2014.” In Tweets from the Campaign Trail. Researching Candidates’ Use of Twitter During the European Parliamentary Elections, ed. by Alex Frame, Arnaud Mercier, Gilles Brachotte, and Caja Thimm, 145–169. Bern: Peter Lang.
Arrese, Juana I. Marín
Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider, and Sharon Millar
Ben-David, Anat, and Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández
Berger, J. M., and Bill Strathearn
2016 “ECRI General Policy Recommendation No. 15 On Combating Hate Speech.” https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/activities/GPR/EN/Recommendation_N15/REC-15-2016-015-ENG.pdf
González, Montserrat, Paolo Roseano, Joan Borràs-Comes, and Pilar Prieto
Hanks, William F.
Henrich, Natalie, and Bev Holmes
Jensen, Eva Skafte
Josey, Christopher S.
Perry, Barbara, and Ryan Scrivens
2016 “The Borderline between Irony and Sarcasm”. In Let Us Have Articles Betwixt Us – Papers in Historical and Comparative Linguistics in Honour of Johanna L. Wood, ed. by Sten Vikner, Henrik Jørgensen, and Elly van Gelderen, 421–438. Aarhus: Dept. of English, School of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University.
van Dijk, Teun A.