Even though there seem to be no objectively defined criteria about what constitutes hate speech, a lot of legislation and policy making currently aims at combating it. This paper sets out to define hate speech under its standard legal understanding of ‘incitement to discriminatory hatred’, by adopting a speech-act theoretic perspective. My main proposal is that the Austinian distinction between illocution and perlocution can be pivotal in this process, since hate speech may be an illocutionary act that is typically tied to the recognition of a speaker’s intention to incite discriminatory hatred, but one which can only be defined if one takes into account its speaker’s intended perlocutionary effects; that is, the intention of the speaker to trigger a particular kind of response from some audience. Against this backdrop, I turn to show how a reworked Searlean notion of felicity conditions can be usefully applied in the delineation of hate speech under this legal conception.
Alkiviadou, Natalie. 2017. “Regulating Hate Speech in the EU.” In Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective, ed. by Stavros Assimakopoulos, Fabienne Baider, and Sharon Millar, 6–10. Cham: Springer.
Altman, Andrew. 1993. “Liberalism and Campus Hate Speech: A Philosophical Examination.” Ethics 103 (2): 302–317.
Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne Baider, and Sharon Millar (eds). 2017. Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Cham: Springer.
Austin, John L.1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baider, Fabienne, Stavros Assimakopoulos, and Sharon Millar. 2017. “Hate Speech in the EU and the C.O.N.T.A.C.T. Project.” In Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective, ed. by Stavros Assimakopoulos, Fabienne Baider, and Sharon Millar, 1–6. Cham: Springer.
Brown, Alexander. 2015. Hate Speech Law: A Philosophical Examination. New York: Routledge.
Brown, Alexander. 2017a. “What Is Hate Speech? Part 1: The Myth of Hate.” Law and Philosophy 36 (4): 419–468.
Brown, Alexander. 2017b. “What Is Hate Speech? Part 2: Family Resemblances.” Law and Philosophy 36 (5): 561–613.
Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.
Cortese, Anthony. 2006. Opposing Hate Speech. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Council of the European Union. 2008. “Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law.” Official Journal of the European Union L 328/55. [URL]
Delgado, Richard, and Jean Stefancic. 2009. “Four Observations about Hate Speech.” Wake Forest Law Review 441: 353–370.
Devine, Patricia G., E. Ashby Plant, and Irene V. Blair. 2001. “Classic and Contemporary Analyses of Racial Prejudice.” In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes, ed. by Rupert Brown, and Sam Gaertner, 198–217. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dovidio, John F., and Samuel L. Gaertner. 1998. “On the Nature of Contemporary Prejudice: The Causes, Consequences, and Challenges of Aversive Racism.” In Confronting Racism: The Problem and the Response, ed. by Jennifer L. Eberhardt, and Susan T. Fiske, 3–32. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3: Speech Acts), ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Gu, Yueguo. 1993. “The Impasse of Perlocution.” Journal of Pragmatics 20 (5): 405–432.
Hornsby, Jennifer, and Rae Langton. 1998. “Free Speech and Illocution.” Legal Theory 4 (1): 21–37.
Iganski, Paul. 1999. “Legislating Against Hate: Outlawing Racism and Antisemitism in Britain.” Critical Social Policy 19 (1): 129–141.
Kurzon, Dennis. 1998. “The Speech Act Status of Incitement: Perlocutionary Acts Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (5): 571–596.
Langton, Rae. 1993. “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 22 (4): 293–330.
Langton, Rae. 2012. “Beyond Belief: Pragmatics in Hate Speech and Pornography.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech, ed. by Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 72–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langton, Rae. 2016. “Hate Speech and the Epistemology of Justice.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4): 865–873.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leets, Laura. 2003. “Disentangling Perceptions of Subtle Racist Speech: A Cultural Perspective.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22 (2): 145–168.
Levin, Abigail. 2010. The Cost of Free Speech: Pornography, Hate Speech, and their Challenge to Liberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
McGonagle, Tarlach. 2013. “The Council of Europe Against Online Hate Speech: Conundrums and Challenges.” Council of Europe Expert Paper. [URL]
McGowan, Mary Kate. 2009. “Oppressive Speech.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3): 389–407.
Petrova, Dimitrina. 2010. “‘Smoke and Mirrors’: The Durban Review Conference and Human Rights Politics at the United Nations.” Human Rights Law Review 10 (1): 129–150.
Post, Robert. 2009. “Hate Speech.” In Extreme Speech and Democracy, ed. by Ivan Hare and James Weinstein, 123–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, John R.1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sellars, Andrew F.2016. “Defining Hate Speech.” Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 2016–20. Boston University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 16–48.
Tamanaha, Brian Z.1995. “An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15 (4): 501–535.
Tsesis, Alexander. 2013. “Inflammatory Hate Speech: Offense versus Incitement.” Minnesota Law Review 971: 101–152.
UN General Assembly. 1966. “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.” United Nations Treaty. [URL]
van Dijk, Teun A.1995. “Ideological Discourse Analysis.” New Courant 41: 135–161.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2012. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Weber, Anne. 2009. Manual on Hate Speech. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
West, Caroline. 2017. “Freedom of Expression and Derogatory Words.” In A Companion to Applied Philosophy, ed. by Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee, and David Coady. 236–252. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Whillock, Rita Kirk, and David Slayden (eds). 1995. Hate Speech. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Alcántara-Plá, Manuel
2024. Understanding emotions in hate speech: A methodology for discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 35:4 ► pp. 417 ff.
Boukala, Salomi
2024. The Greek left-wing and the ‘Jewish problem’: analysing antizionism and antisemitism as forms of soft hate speech. Critical Discourse Studies► pp. 1 ff.
Domínguez-Armas, Álvaro
2024. ‘Argumentative Disobedience’ as a Strategy to Confront Hate Speech. Argumentation 38:4 ► pp. 499 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris & Stavros Assimakopoulos
2024. Zooming in on the study of soft hate speech: an introduction to this special issue. Critical Discourse Studies► pp. 1 ff.
2024. Endoxa, Regimes of Truth, and Hatred Rhetoric: Examining Golden Dawn’s Online Media Discourses. In Class, Culture, and the Media in Greece, Volume 1, ► pp. 127 ff.
Ermida, Isabel
2023. Distinguishing Online Hate Speech from Aggressive Speech: A Five-Factor Annotation Model. In Hate Speech in Social Media, ► pp. 35 ff.
Ermida, Isabel
2023. Building and Analysing an Online Hate Speech Corpus: The NETLANG Experience and Beyond. In Hate Speech in Social Media, ► pp. 3 ff.
Parvaresh, Vahid
2023. Covertly communicated hate speech: A corpus-assisted pragmatic study. Journal of Pragmatics 205 ► pp. 63 ff.
2023. The Institutionalization of Hatred Politics in the Mediterranean: Studying Corpora of Online News Portals During the European ‘Refugee Crisis’. Topoi 42:2 ► pp. 651 ff.
2021. Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 4 ff.
Rodney H. Jones
2021. Viral Discourse,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.