Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 13:4 (2022) ► pp.555–584

Reduction in and out of context

| Högskolan Dalarna

This article investigates reduced language in academic textchat. Previous work has suggested that frequency and context play a role in whether items can be reduced. It is demonstrated that students reduce more depending on the pedagogical set-up of the course, in that more reduction took place when the teacher-less pre-seminars came early in the course. Also, it was clear that high frequency items are more subject to reduction. When the topic is clear, items salient in such a discussion can be reduced. Also, the linguistic context of a full form of an item means that subsequent mentions can be reduced. Technical items vary in their behavior, and can be reduced or not. Another main conclusion, though, is that individuals also vary, and, when the context allows for it, can choose to reduce or not.

Keywords: textchat, reduction, discourse context, salience, frequency, individual variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Reduction processes
    • 2.2The context of reduction
  • 3.The dataset
  • 4.Amount of reduced forms
  • 5.High frequency items
  • 6.Low frequency items
  • 7.Technical terms
  • 8.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 4 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18076.whi
References
Al-Sa’di, Rami and Jihad M. Hamdan
(2005) Synchronous online chat in English: Computer-mediated communication. World Englishes 24(4): 409–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopolous, Jannis
2000 Non-standard spellings in media texts: The case of German fanzines. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(4): 514–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bieswanger, Mark
2007 2 abbrevi8 or not 2 abbrevi8: A contrastive analysis of different shortening strategies in English and German text messages. Texas Linguistic Forum 50 1. Available from: [URL]. Retrieved 5th March, 2014.
Crystal, David
(2008) Txting: The gr8 db8. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan
2012 Grammar and electronic communication. In Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol Chapelle, 2338–2346. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hård af Segerstad, Ylva
2002 Use and adaptation of written language to the conditions of computer-mediated communication. PhD thesis, Göteborgs Universitet.
Kul, Malgorzata
2007a Metaphonology in text messages. In The Media and International Communication: Lodz Studies in Language 15 1, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Tomasz Pludowski and Dolores Valencia Tanno, 429–442. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2007b Phonology in text messages. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 43(2): 43–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Carmen
2002 Literacy practices in computer-mediated communication in Hong Kong. The Reading Matrix 2(2): 1–25.Google Scholar
López Rúa, Paula
2005 Shortening devices in text messaging. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 106(2): 139–155.Google Scholar
Lotherington, Heather and Yejun Xu
2004 How to chat in English and Chinese: Emerging digital language conventions. ReCALL 16(2): 308–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Denise
2000 Protean communication: The language of computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly 34(3): 397–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagg, Caroline
(2016) Heteroglossia in text-messaging: Performing identity and negotiating relationships in a digital space. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(1), 59–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin
2003 Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online 1, 11. Available from [URL]. Retrieved 10th November, 2013.
Werry, Christopher
1996 Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In Computer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives, ed. by Susan Herring, 47–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Jonathan R.
2014a Standardisation of Reduced Forms in English in an Academic Community of Practice. Pragmatics and Society 5(1): 105–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b The Pragmatics of Reduced Forms in an Internet Community of Practice. In Lodz Studies in Language 33: Cognitive and Pragmatics Aspects of Speech Actions, ed. by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, 167–183. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Processes and Variations in Language Economisation. Ampersand 21: 72–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Local Norms in CALL Language Practice. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Technology 6(1): 40–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Exploration of Textual Interactions in CALL Learning Communities: Emerging Research and Opportunities. Hershey, Penn.: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Individual Variation in Reduction Processes in L2 English Academic Textchat. Ampersand 51: 18–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2011 Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar