A marathon to nowhere
Conceptualisation of the integrations of the Western Balkans into the EU through the accession is a race metaphor
The paper examines the accession is a race metaphor in the online news articles published in three Western Balkans’ countries (Serbia, Montenegro, and Bosnia and Hercegovina), in the context of their accession to the EU. Through the methodological lens of the conceptual metaphor theory and critical metaphor analysis, our study shows that the conceptualisation of the accession as a race might purport different, even mutually conflicted political stances, i.e. it can have a laudatory function praising those at the forefront of the “race”, while at the same time calling for patience invoking the picture of the race as a marathon, long and exhausting, demanding in both time and stamina. Without delving further into the political reasons, concerns and vested interests of the stakeholders involved, what can be said with much certainty is that both the EU and the regional officials have made some creative excuses for the excessive duration of the EU integration process for the WB’s countries, and these have been analysed in the present study. The analysis has shown that the “finish line” of the race (the accession itself), long or short, is far less important in the regional news discourse than reaching further out than your co-runners, i.e. your immediate neighbours and competitors.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Socio-political background
- 3.Theoretical background
- 3.1Conceptual metaphor theory and critical metaphor analysis
- 3.2Conceptual metaphor politics is sport
- 3.3Conceptualisation of the EU
- 4.Research aim and questions
- 5.Corpus and methodology
- 6.Analysis
- 6.1How frequently is the accession is a race metaphor used in the online news articles published in Serbia, Montenegro, and Bosnia and Hercegovina?
- 6.2How is the accession is a race metaphor linguistically realised in the online news articles published in Serbia, Montenegro, and Bosnia and Hercegovina?
- 6.3How is the accession is a race metaphor strategically exploited to political purposes the online news articles published in Serbia, Montenegro, and Bosnia and Hercegovina?
- 7.Conclusion
- Note
-
References
References (34)
References
Bijelić, Dušan. 2002. “Introduction: Blowing up the Bridge”. In Balkan as Metaphor: between Globalisation and Fragmentation, ed. by Dušan Bijelić and Obrad Savić, 1–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Callies, Marcus. 2009. “Within-culture variation in English sports metaphors: A window to history, culture, and national identity?” Paper presented at the conference:
Bi-directional Perspectives in the Cognitive Sciences
. Marburg, Feb 26–28, 2009. Available at: [URL]
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmilan.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2006. “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign.” Discourse & Society 17(6): 563–582.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Đurović, Tatjana, and Nadežda Silaški. 2014. “The TEACHER-STUDENT Metaphor in Serbian EU Accession Discourse–A Case of Cognitive Marginalisation.” In Jezik, književnost, marginalizacija: Jezička istraživanja, ed. by Biljana Mišić-Ilić, and Vesna Lopičić, 47–59. Niš: Filozofski fakultet.
Drulák, Petr, and Lucie Königová. 2007. “Figuring out Europe: EU Metaphors in the Minds of Czech Civil Servants.” Perspectives 15(1): 5–23.
Gatti, Lauren, and Theresa Catalano. “The Business of Learning to Teach: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of One Teacher’s Journey.” Teaching and Teacher Education 451 (2015): 149–160.
Goldsworthy, Vesna. 2002. “Invention and In(ter)vention: The Rhetoric of Balkanisation.” In Balkan as Metaphor: between Globalisation and Fragmentation ed. by Dušan Bjelić, and Obrad Savić. 25–38. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hart, Christopher. 2008. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Metaphor: Toward a Theoretical framework.” Critical Discourse Studies 5 (2): 91–106.
Hellín-García, María José. 2014. “Politics at Play: Game Metaphors in Spanish Political Discourse.” Hipertexto 191: 132–151.
Horolets, Anna. 2003. “Conceptualising Europe through Metaphors: A Way to Identity Formation?” Polish Sociological Review: 115–129.
Howe, Nicholas. 1988. “Metaphor in Contemporary American Political Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 3 (2): 87–104.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George. 1991. “Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used justify war in the Gulf”. Peace Research: 25–32.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Freame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Linkeviciute, Vilma. 2018. “Conceptual Metaphors in Donald Trump’s Political Discourse: Politics Domain.” Studies About Languages 341: 46–55.
Musolff, Andreas. 2000. “Political imagery of Europe: A house without exit doors?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21 (3): 216–229.
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musolff, Andreas. 2012. “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical discourse studies 9 (3): 301–310.
Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London, Oxford, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Musolff, Andreas. 2017. “The Metaphorisation of European Politics: Movement on the Road to Europe.” In Attitudes Towards Europe: Language in the Unification Process, ed. by Andreas Musolff et al., 179–200. Routledge.
Petraškaite-Pabst, Sandra. 2010. “Metaphors in German and Lithuanian Discourse concerning the Expansion of the European Union.” In Contesting Europe’s Eastern Rim: Cultural Identities in Public Discourse, ed. by Ljiljana Šarić, Andreas Musolff, Stefan Manz and Ingrid Hudabiunigg, 33–50. Toronto, CA: Multilingual Matters.
Petrović, Tanja. 2009. A Long Way Home: Representations of the Western Balkans in Political and Media Discourses. Ljubljana: Peace Institute.
Group, Pragglejaz. 2007. “MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 22.1: 1–39.
Radić-Bojanić, Biljana, and Nadežda Silaški. 2008. “Sportizacija političkog diskursa–kako metafore prikrivaju političku stvarnost Srbije.” Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku 51(1–2): 139–155.
Radić-Bojanić, Biljana, and Nadežda Silaški. 2012. “Metaphors of Hegemonic Masculinity–Women’s Understanding of Sport Metaphors in Political Discourse.” Gender Studies 11 (1): 245–257.
Semino, Elena, and Michela Masci. 1996. “Politics is Football: Metaphor in the Discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy.” Discourse & Society 7 (2): 243–269.
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silaški, Nadežda, and Tatjana Đurović. 2014. “One Step Forward, Two Steps back: Conceptualising Serbia’s EU Accession in Serbian and EU Discourse.” In Metaphor and Intercultural Communication, ed. by Andreas Musolff, Fiona MacArthur, and Guilio Pagani, 167–184. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
Van Dijk, Teun. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Tannen, Deborah Schiffrin, and Heidi Hamilton, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.
Werkmann, Ana, and Gabrijela Buljan. 2013. Knocking on EU’s Door: on the Changing and Conflicting Metaphorical Images of Croatia in Selected EU Press. Jezikoslovlje 14(2–3): 337–362.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Liu, Yufeng, Dechao Li & Jieyun Feng
2024.
Incorporating cross-linguistic and time-based dimensions to Critical Metaphor Analysis: a specialised hands-on analytical approach.
Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.