Mitigating requesting acts by deaf Jordanian adults
The purpose of this study is to investigate the linguistic mitigating devices that deaf Jordanian adults use when making requests. To this end, a sample of 52 people (of whom 26 were hearing and 26 were deaf) was collected through a Discourse Completion Task (DCT). It was found that the two groups of participants showed variations in the way they structured their request acts and spelled them out. This was evident in the deaf group’s obvious underuse of certain request mitigation strategies and the lexico-grammatical items mapping them; in the absence of some strategies (i.e., sweetener, promise of reward, hint, and threat); and in the underassessment of social distance, relative power, and degree of imposition. This inappropriate use of requesting acts by deaf participants is attributed to their inadequate linguistic, pragma-linguistic and socio-pragmatic competence. The study concludes with some suggestions how to improve the Jordanian educational system for the deaf.
- 2.Theoretical framework
- 3.2Research instruments
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Structure of request acts
- 4.2Mitigating devices of request acts
- 5.Conclusion and implications
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Al-Ali, Mohammed, and Rami Al-Alawneh
Al-Ali, Mohammed, and Meera Sahawneh
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
Etikan, Sulaiman, and Rukayya Alkassim
Færch, Claus, and Gabriele Kasper
Geers, Ann, Johanna Nicholas, and Allison Sedey
Ibertsson, Tina, Kristina Hansson, Lena Asker-Arnason, and Brigitta Sahlen
1997 “Can Pragmatics be Taught?” Plenary Talk given at the Annual TESOL Convention. Orlando, Florida.
Nelson, Gayle, Joan Carson, Mahmoud Al-Batal and Waguida El Bakary
Paatsch, Louse, Peter Blamey, Julia Sarant, and Catherine Bow
Toe, Dianne, Rod Beattie, and Megan Barr
Usó-Juan, Esther, and Alicia Martínez-Flor