Article in:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 13:4 (2022) ► pp. 585604
References
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
2009 “Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics.” Language Learning 591: 755–795. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Formulas, routines, and conventional expressions in pragmatics research.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 321: 206–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Awareness of meaning of conventional expressions in second-language pragmatics.” Language Awareness 23(1–2): 41–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “Routines in L2 pragmatics research.” In Handbook of SLA and pragmatics, ed. by Naoko Taguchi, 47–62. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, and Maria-Thereza Bastos
2011 “Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 81: 347–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob
1988Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1992 “A power primer.” Psychological Bulletin 1121: 155–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltan
2009The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halenko, Nicola
2018 “Using Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL) Tools to Enhance Output Practice.” In Practice in Second Language Learning, ed. by Christian Jones, 137–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
2008 “Data collection in pragmatics research.” In Culturally speaking (2nd Ed.), ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 279–303. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2000 “A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances.” Journal of Pragmatics 32(6): 605–625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Situation-bound utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Formulaic language in English lingua franca.” In Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Laurence R. Horn, 191–218. New York & Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010 “Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(11): 2889–2897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “How does pragmatic competence develop in bilinguals?International Journal of Multilingualism 12(4): 419–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan, Olga Obdalova, Ludmila Minakova, and Aleksandra Soboleva
2018 “A study of the perception of situation-bound utterances as culture-specific pragmatic units by Russian learners of English.” System 761: 219–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinginger, Celeste
2008 “Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France.” Modern Language Journal 92, Supplement S1. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Citing, Wendong Li, and Wei Ren
2021 “Tracking the trajectories of international students’ pragmatic choices in studying abroad in China: a social network perspective”. Language, Culture and Curriculum 34(4): 398–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, Alison, and Susan M. Gass
2005Second language research: methodology and design. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ren, Wei
2015L2 pragmatic development in study abroad contexts. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “Pragmatic development of Chinese during study abroad: A cross-sectional study of learner requests”. Journal of Pragmatics 1461: 137–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roever, Carsten
2012 “What learners get for free: Learning of routine formulae in ESL and EFL environments.” ELT Journal 661: 10–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, Naoko
2011 “The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience in pragmatic comprehension.” Language Learning 611: 904–939. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience.” System 411: 109–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Developing interactional competence in a Japanese study abroad context. Bristol & New York: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Contexts and pragmatics learning: Problems and opportunities of the study abroad research.” Language Teaching 51 (1): 124–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, Naoko, Qiong Li, and Xiaofei Tang
2017 “Learning Chinese formulaic expressions in a scenario-based interactive environment.” Foreign Language Annals 501: 641–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, Naoko, Shuai Li, and Feng Xiao
2013 “Production of formulaic expressions in L2 Chinese: A developmental investigation in a study abroad context.” Chinese as a Second Language Research 21: 23–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, Naoko, and Carsten Roever
(eds) 2017Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar