Article published In:
Pragmatics and SocietyVol. 15:4 (2024) ► pp.501–531
Historical imprints on Chinese ideological given names
This diachronic study investigates Chinese ideological given names (personal names which represent the name-givers’ shared ideas and beliefs) by focusing on historical changes over five time periods between 1935 and 2012. Based on an analysis of 21,687 given names, 2,687 (12.4%) of which are ideological names, the study finds that naming practices bear historical imprints in terms of content and syllabic form. The more intensely a society is politicized, the higher the rate of occurrence of ideological given names. The data also illustrate the dynamic that exists in naming practices between conformity and individuality. In this article, we argue that names are like social cards: people play them to serve their ideological needs, as shown by the evolution of naming strategies through different historical periods. The implication is that historical changes can influence the way in which a name can communicate ideological views.
Keywords: given names, personal names, first names, Chinese names, ideological names, socio-onomastics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Chinese names
- 2.1Given names in the Chinese personal naming system
- 2.2Ideological given names
- 3.Data and methodology
- 3.1Research design
- 3.2Data analysis
- 4.Changes in the content, quantity, and form of ideological names
- 4.1Changes in the content and quantity of ideological names
- 4.1.1Period 1: The Republic of China (1935–1948)
- 4.1.2Period 2: Socialist transformation (1949–1965)
- 4.1.3Period 3: The Cultural Revolution (1966–1976)
- 4.1.4Period 4: Economic Reform (1977–1984)
- 4.1.5Period 5: Economic Growth (2010–2012)
- 4.2Form changes in ideological names
- 4.1Changes in the content and quantity of ideological names
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Historical imprints on Chinese ideological names
- 5.2Conformity
- 5.3Individualism
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- Note
-
References
References (37)
Ainiala, Terhi
2016 “Attitudes to Street Names in Helsinki.” In Names and Naming: People, Places, Perceptions and Power, ed. by Guy Puzey, and Laura Kostanski, 106–119. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 
Ainiala, Terhi, and Jan-Ola Östman
2017 “Introduction: Socio-onomastics and Pragmatics.” In Socio-Onomastics: The Pragmatics of Names, ed. by Terhi Ainiala, and Jan-Ola Östman, 2–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aldrin, Emilia
2017 “Creating Identities through the Choice of First Names.” In Socio-Onomastics: The Pragmatics of Names, ed. by Terhi Ainiala, and Jan-Ola Östman, 46–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aleksiejuk, Katarzyna
2016 “Internet Personal Naming Practices and Trends in Scholarly Approaches”. In Names and Naming: People, Places, Perceptions and Power, ed. by Guy Puzey, and Laura Kostanski, 3–17. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Alhaug, Gulbrand, and Minna Saarelma
2017 “Naming of Children in Finnish and Finnish-Norwegian Families in Norway”. In Socio-Onomastics: The Pragmatics of Names, ed. by Terhi Ainiala, and Jan-Ola Östman, 70–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cheang, Justina
2008 “Choice of Foreign Names as a Strategy for Identity Management.” Intercultural Communication Studies 17(2): 197–202.
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré
2001 “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” In Discourse Theory and Practice, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon Yates, 261–271. London: Sage.
Duranti, Alessandro
2003 “Language as Culture in U.S. Anthropology: Three Paradigms.” Current Anthropology 44(3): 323–347.
Chinese Dictionary Compilation Division
(汉语大字典编纂处) 2018 Chinese Comprehensive Dictionary (中华大词典). Chengdu: Sichuan Dictionary Press (四川辞书出版社).
Friedman, Edward, Paul G. Pickowicz, and Mark Selden
2005 Revolution, Resistance, and Reform in Village China. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Goodenough, Ward H.
1965 “Personal Names and Modes of Address in Two Oceanic Societies.” In Context and Meaning in Cultural Anthropology, ed. by Melford E. Spiro, 265–276. New York: Free Press.
Gu, Yueguo
1990 “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 237–257.
Habibi, Nader
1992 “Popularity of Islamic and Persian Names in Iran Before and After the Islamic Revolution.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 241: 253–260.
Henry, Eric S.
2012 “When Dragon Met Jasmine: Domesticating English Names in Chinese Social Interaction.” Anthropologica 54(1): 107–117.
Herbert, Robert K.
1998 “Personal Naming and Social Organization: The Comparative Anthroponymy of Southern Africa.” In Scope, Perspectives and Methods of Onomastics, ed. by Wilhelm F. H. Nicolaisen, 187–194. Aberdeen: Department of English, University of Aberdeen.
Hofstede, Geert
2001 Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. New York: Sage.
Leibring, Katharina
2016 “Given Names in European Naming Systems.” In The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming, ed. by Carole Hough, 199–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lieberson, Stanley
2000 A Matter of Taste: How Names, Fashions, and Culture Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lieberson, Stanley, and Eleanor O. Bell
1992 “Children’s First Names: An Empirical Study of Social Taste.” American Journal of Sociology 98(3): 511–554.
Lieberson, Stanley, and Freda B. Lynn
2003 “Popularity as a Taste: An Application to the Naming Process.” Onoma 381: 235–276.
Lindsay, Jo, and Deborah Dempsey
2017 “First Names and Social Distinction: Middle-class Naming Practices in Australia.” Journal of Sociology 53(3): 577–591.
Lou, Guangqin
1985 “Looking at Social Culture from Names.” Foreign Language Teaching and Research 51: 79–82.
Mao, Robert L. M.
1994 “Beyond Politeness Theory: ‘Face’ Revisited and Renewed.” Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 451–486.
Men, Zaofen
2010 “A Cross-cultural Comparative Study of Chinese and English Names.” Journal of Chifeng University 11: 33–36.
Obukhova, Elena, Ezra W. Zuckerman, and Jiayin Zhang
2014 “When Politics Froze Fashion: The Effect of the Cultural Revolution on Naming in Beijing.” American Journal of Sociology 120(2): 555–583.
Rogers, Everett M.
2003 Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rymes, Betsy
1996 “Naming as Social Practice: The Case of Little Creeper from Diamond Street.” Language in Society 251: 237–260.
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Wong Scollon
1995 Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sung, Margaret M. Y.
1981 “Chinese Personal Naming.” Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 161: 67–90.
van Dijk, Teun A.
1995 “Discourse Semantics and Ideology.” Discourse and Society 6(2): 243–289.
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse and Society 17(3): 359–383.
Van Langendonck, Willy
2007 Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Varnum, Michael E. W., and Kitayama Shinobu
2011 “What’s in a Name? Popular Names are Less Common on Frontiers. Psychological Science 221: 176–183.
Walkowiak, Justyna B.
2016 “Personal Names in Language Policy and Planning: Who Plans What Names, for Whom and How?” In Names and Naming: People, Places, Perceptions and Power, ed. by Guy Puzey, and Laura Kostanski, 197–212. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Weitman, Sasha
1987 “Prénoms et Orientations Nationales en Israël 1882–1980.” Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 421: 879–900.
Yu, Rongmei
2019 “An Intercultural Comparative Study on Names of Chinese and English.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 9(10): 1332–1336.