Cover not available
Article published In:
The Discourse of Terrorism
Edited by Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio and Juan L. Castro
[Pragmatics and Society 13:3] 2022
► pp. 404–430

Approaches to the discourse of terror

How power relations are represented through forced primings in jihadist magazines

| University of Granada
| University of Eastern Finland
This chapter presents an investigation into the evidence of fixed language use within jihadist magazines and the extent to which these fixed patterns reflect specific power relations within the text community. The research presents the hypothesis that the writers of articles in jihadist magazines have become primed to employ the words and sets of words through their repeat usage (cf. Hoey 2005, 2017). Thus, lexical and grammatical associations and constructions are analysed to determine the extent to which language use is unique in our corpus. Evidence is presented in the unique way power relationships are linguistically expressed; it is argued here that this reflects the ways in which the writers are primed for their motives or aims of recruitment. Here, a number of words, which are fairly common in news discourse and are in the sematic field of power relations, have been identified as keywords in jihadist magazines. These show the collocation and colligation divergence where they are compared with occurrences in the COCA magazines sub-corpus covering the same time period.
Keywords: discourse analysis, lexical priming, corpus linguistics, power, ideology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research background
    • 2.1Jihadism, language and ideology
    • 2.2Lexical priming
  • 3.Corpora and methodology
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Introduction
    • 4.2Variations in low-frequency words: Two examples
    • 4.3Establishment and democracy
    • 4.4Oppression
    • 4.5Rule
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 July 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21015.pat
References
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery
2012 “Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998–2009.” Applied Linguistics 34(3): 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2020 The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ million words, 1990-present (2008). Available online at [URL].
Dhiab-Hassan, Azzam, Benítez-Casto, Miguel Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2018 Nutcracker: The JIHAD Corpus. University of Granada.Google Scholar
Dobrovolskiy, Dimitriy and Ludmila Pöppel
2013 “Lexical synonymy within the semantic field POWER.” Current Studies in Slavic Linguistics 1461: 281–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duguid, Alison and Alan Partington
2017 “Forced lexical primings in transdiscoursive political messaging.” In Lexical Priming: Applications and Advances, ed. by Michael Pace-Sigge and Katie J. Patterson. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Michael
2005 Lexical Priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2017 “Cohesion and Coherence in a Content-Specific Corpus.” In Lexical Priming: Applications and Advances, ed. by Michael Pace-Sigge and Katie J. Patterson. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuśmierski, Stanisław
1987 Świadomość społeczna. Opinia publiczna. Propaganda. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Łyżwa, Edyta
2019 “Press Propaganda as a Tool of Social Communication-the Historical Perspective.” Zeszyty Naukowe, Organizacja i Zarządzanie Politechnika Śląska, 1391: ‘Competitiveness and Development of Regions in the Context of European Integration and Globalization. State-Trends-Strategies’, 279–289.Google Scholar
Marcellino, William M., Kim Cragin, Joshua Mendelsohn, Andrew Michael Cady, Madeline Magnuson, and Kathleen Reedy
2016 “Measuring the Popular Resonance of Daesh’s Propaganda.” Journal of Strategic Security, 10(1): 32–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matusitz, Jonathan and James Olufowote
2016 “Visual motifs in Islamist terrorism: Applying conceptual metaphor theory.” Journal of Applied Security Research 11(1): 18–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milton, Daniel
2020 “Fatal attraction: Explaining variation in the attractiveness of Islamic State propaganda.” Conflict Management and Peace Science, 37(4): 430–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Regan, John and Anne Betzel
2016 “Critical Discourse Analysis: A Sample Study of Extremism.” Research Methods in Intercultural Communication, 2811.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (OED)
2020 [URL] (last accessed 9 October 2020).
Partington, Alan
2014 “Mind the gaps: The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(1): 118–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, and Charlotte Taylor
2013 Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prentice, Sheryl, Paul Rayson, and Paul J. Taylor
2012 “The language of Islamic extremism: Towards an automated identification of beliefs, motivations and justifications.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(2): 259–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike
2020 WordSmith Tools, version 8. Stroud, Kent: Lexical Analysis Software. [URL] (last accessed 11 November 2020).
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1969 Notebooks, 1914–1916, ed. and tr. G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Yusof, Sofia Hayati, Fauziah Hassan, Md. Salleh Hassan, and Mohd Nizam Osman
2013 “The framing of international media on Islam and terrorism.” European Scientific Journal 9(8): 104–121.Google Scholar