When invoked voices blame real politicians
Confrontational blaming in a speech from Austria’s “commemorative year” 2018
This case study analyses the socio-pragmatic effects of invoked multiple voices in a commemorative speech delivered by Austrian writer Michael Köhlmeier on the occasion of the 2018 Austrian commemoration day against violence and fascism. Köhlmeier uses different forms of discourse representation to blame politicians of the then Austrian government for their political statements and actions. The focus of this article is on the speaker’s combination of (imagined and real) sources and forms of discourse representation, resulting in strategically deployed perspective shifts to express opposition and blame. Furthermore, the sociopragmatic functions of these rhetorical and textual strategies in the context of situation, as well as in the wider context of the Austrian culture of collective remembrance are explored, in particular by showing that by blaming actual Austrian politicians for their political statements and actions, the traditional consensual commemorative discourse is breached. This latter effect is probably responsible for the huge public attention the speech attracted in 2018.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Political genres and their dialogicity
- 3.The commemoration day against violence and fascism on May, 4 2018
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Invoking the situational relevance of Köhlmeier’s speech
- 4.2Unfolding the confrontational blaming
- Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (34)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Antaki, Charles, and Ivan Leudar. 2001. ‘Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents’ Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation’. Text 21 (4): 467–88.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aprent, Patrick. 2019. ‘Prägende Diskurse im Gedenkjahr 2018. Vergangenheit im Fokus öffentlicher Kommunikation (= Zeitgeschichte 46), ed. by Dirk Rupnow and Heidemarie Uhl, 501–535. Göttingen: Vienna University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Atkinson, Max. 1984. Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body-Language of Politics. (New Ed.). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Edited by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple. 2019. News Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bevitori, Cinzia. 2006. ‘Speech Representation in Parliamentary Discourse. Rhetorical Strategies in a Heteroglossic Perspective: A Corpus-Based Study.’ In Studies in Specialized Discourse, edited by John Flowerdew and Maurizio Gotti, 155–179. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cap, Piotr. 2015. ‘Follow-Ups in the US Anti-Terrorist Discourse: Proposal for a Macro-Discursive Approach to Monologic Follow-Up Sequences.’ Discourse & Society 26 (5): 543–61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Fina, Anna, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2012. Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dynel, Marta. 2014. ‘On the Part of Ratified Participants: Ratified Listeners in Multi-Party Interactions’. Brno Studies in English 40 (1): 27–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fetzer, Anita. 2020. ‘And I Quote: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions’. Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 89–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving. 1969. The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, Paul. 1991. ‘Logic and Conversation’. In Pragmatics. A Reader, edited by Steven Davis, 305–15. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gruber, Helmut. 1991. Antisemitismus im Mediendiskurs: Die Affäre Waldheim in der Tagespresse. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gruber, Helmut. 2015. ‘Policy-Oriented Argumentation or Ironic Evaluation: A Study of Verbal Quoting and Positioning in Austrian Politicians’ Parliamentary Debate Contributions’. Discourse Studies 17 (6): 682–702. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Sandra. 2001. ‘Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse’. Discourse & Society 12 (4): 451–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hodges, Adam. 2008. ‘The Politics of Recontextualization: Discursive Competition over Claims of Iranian Involvement in Iraq’. Discourse & Society 191 (4): 483–505 ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Josef. 2000. ‘Textsorten im Bereich Politischer Institutionen’. In Handbuch der Text- und Gesprächsanalyse
2
1, edited by Gerd Antos, Klaus Brinker, and Sven F. Sager, 1589–1605. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuo, Sai-Hua. 2001. ‘Reported Speech in Chinese Political Discourse.’ Discourse Studies 3 (2): 181–202. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kurzon, Dennis. 1996. ‘The White House Speeches: Semantic and Paralinguistic Strategies for Eliciting Applause’. Text & Talk 16 (2): 199–224. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Obermayer, Bastian, and Frederik Obermaier. 2019. Die Ibiza-Affäre: Innenansichten eines Skandals. 5th ed. KiWi-Paperback.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reisigl, Martin. 2007. Nationale Rhetorik in Fest- und Gedenkreden: Eine Diskursanalytische Studie zum ‘Österreichischen Millennium’ in den Jahren 1946 und 1996. Stauffenburg Aktuell, Bd. 7. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rupnow, Dirk, and Heidemarie Uhl, eds. 2019. ‘Gedenkjahr 2018: Vergangenheit im Fokus öffentlicher Kommunikation’. Zeitgeschichte 461.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sivenkova, Maria A. 2016. ‘Intertextual References in British, German and Russian Political Interviews and Blogs’. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61 (1): 161–83. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Suleiman, Camelia, Daniel C. O’Connell, and Sabine Kowal. 2002. ‘“If You and I, If We, in This Later Day, Lose That Sacred Fire …”: Perspective in Political Interviews’. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31 (3): 269–87. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weiss, Daniel. 2020. ‘Analogical Reasoning with Quotations? A Spotlight on Russian Parliamentary Discourse’. Journal of Pragmatics 1551: 101–10. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wieczorek, Anna E. 2010. ‘“And I Quote”: Direct and Indirect Point-of-View Switches in Clusivity-Oriented Discourse’. Lódz Papers in Pragmatics 6 (1): 229–47. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Brusenbauch Meislová, Monika
2024.
Othering through blame: The EU as the blame target in the UK government’s post-Brexit rhetoric.
Discourse, Context & Media 58
► pp. 100773 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.