Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:6 (2023) ► pp.844868
References (35)
References
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Altman, Irwin and Dalmas Taylor. 1973. Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bowman-Grieve, Lorraine. 2009. “Exploring “Stormfront”: A Virtual Community of the Radical Right.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32(11): 989–1007. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 2003. Men Talk: Stories in the Making of Masculinities. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayter, Daria, and Sofia Rüdiger. 2016. “Reporting from the Field: the Narrative Reconstruction of Experience in Pick-Up Artist Online Communities.” Open Linguistics 2(1): 337–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dishy, Aaron. 2018. “Swallowing Misandry: A Survey of the Discursive Strategies of r/TheRedPill on Reddit.” MA diss., Toronto University.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. “Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice.” Annual Review of Anthropology 21 ( 1 ): 461–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
franzke, aline shakti, Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, Charles Ess, and the Association of Internet Researchers. 2020. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Available at [URL]
Flynn, Mark, and Alexandru Stana. 2012. “Social Support in a Men’s Online Eating Disorder Forum.” International Journal of Men’s Health 11(2): 150–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gough, Brendan. 2016. “Men’s Depression Talk Online: a Qualitative Analysis of Accountability and Authenticity in Help Seeking and Support Formulations.” Psychology of Men & Masculinity 17(1): 156–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Esmée, and Brendan Gough. 2018. “Searching for Help Online: an Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Posts on a Male-Only Infertility Forum.” Journal of Health Psychology 23(7): 917–928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, Eric. 2012. “Ascetic Hedonism: Self and Sexual Conquest in the Seduction Community.” Cultural Analysis 11(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Heritage, Frazer, and Veronika Koller. 2020. “Incels, In-groups, and Ideologies: the Representation of Gendered Social Actors in a Sexuality-Based Online Community.” Journal of Language and Sexuality 9(2): 153–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1988. “Paying Compliments: a Sex-Preferential Politeness Strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics 12(1): 445–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Edward, and Thane Pittman. 1982. “Towards a General Theory of Strategic Self-Presentation.” In Psychological Perspectives on the Self, ed. by Jerry M. Suls, 2321–2362). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Krendel, Alexandra. 2020. The men and women, guys and girls of the ‘manosphere’: A corpus-assisted discourse approach. Discourse & Society 31(6): 607–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Étienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Robert, and Mark McGlashan. 2017. “You Need to Become Prime Dick”: a Corpus-Based Analysis of Self-Help Discourses and Gender Constructions in Online Seduction Communities. 116th annual American Anthropological Association meeting, Washington D.C, 30th November 2017.
Locher, Miriam. 2006. Advice Online: Advice-giving in an American Internet Health Column. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice and Robyn Caplan. 2018. “Drinking Male Tears: Language, the Manosphere, and Networked Harassment.” Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 543–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLean, Scott, and Laurie Vermeylen. 2019. “From Getting Ahead to Getting Back on One’s Feet: Performing Masculinity as a Self-Help Reader.” Men and Masculinities 22(4): 716–737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mountford, JB. 2018. “Topic Modeling the Red Pill.” Social Sciences 7(3): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Rosaleen, Kate Hunt, and Graham Hart. 2005. “‘It’s Caveman Stuff, but That is to a Certain Extent How Guys Still Operate’: Men’s Accounts of Masculinity and Help-Seeking.” Social Science and Medicine 61(3): 503–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Rachel. 2016. “Homosociality and Heterosex: Patterns of Intimacy and Relationality among Men in the London ‘Seduction Community’.” In A. Cornwall, F. G. Karioris & N. Lindisfarne (Eds.), Masculinities Under Neoliberalism. (pp.261–276). London: Zed Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rüdiger, Sofia, and Daria Dayter. 2020. “Manbragging Online: Self-Praise on Pick-Up Artists’ Forums.” Journal of Pragmatics 161(1): 16–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Men and Women in Conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics. Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valkenburgh, Shaun. 2021. “Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and Neoliberalism in the Manosphere.” Men and Masculinities 24(1): 84–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Étienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Scott, Verity Trott, and Callum Jones. 2020. “‘The Pussy Ain’t Worth it, Bro’: Assessing the Structure and Discourse of MGTOW.” Information, Communication & Society 23(6): 908–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

O'Toole, Olga
2024. (Im)politeness as a Strategy in the Discursive Construction of In-Group Solidarity in Discussions about Love, Sex and Relationships on Incels.is. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 9:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.