Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society: Online-First Articles

The humorous effect of routine formulas in Spanish and English televised monologues

ORCID logo | Illinois State University,
| Illinois State University,
The present comparative study investigates the use of multi-word expressions known as ‘routine formulas’ in the humorous monologues of four comedians from four different late-night TV shows in Spain and the United States. The study is framed in the General Theory of Verbal Humor (GTVH) and linguistic phraseology. The study of routine formulas is intriguing due to their overlooked status in discussions, despite their simple semantics. Yet, they play various pragmatic roles, particularly in humor creation and comprehension, which is the primary focus here. The study aims to achieve two objectives: first, to identify the routine formulas present in both Spanish and English and assess their frequency in monologue delivery, and second, to examine how these formulas contribute to humor within the monologues.
Keywords: phraseology, routine formulas, humor, late-night TV monologues
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
    • 2.1Humor theory
    • 2.2Phraseological unit
    • 2.3Phraseology and humor
  • 3.Motivation for the study and research questions
  • 4.Data and methodology
    • 4.1Corpus
    • 4.2Taxonomy of routine formulas and data analysis
  • 5.Findings and discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 31 May 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.23062.mir
References (49)
References
Alvarado Ortega, Maria Belen. 2010. Las Fórmulas Rutinarias: Teoría y Aplicaciones. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015a. “Phraseological Features in Conversational Routines. An Integrative Model of Autonomy.” Lingusticae Investigationes 38 (1): 313–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. “Independencia y fórmulas rutinarias. Reestructuración de la esfera 3”. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 28 (1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Indicadores semánticos para el estudio del humor en la comunicación: el caso de la fraseología en los monólogos”. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 851: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arsenteva, Elena (ed.). 2014. Phraseology in Multilingual Society. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin. 1991. “Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 4 (3–4): 293–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2008. “A Primer of the Linguistics of Humor.” In The Primer of humor research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 101–155. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017a. “The GTVH and Humorous Discourse.” In Humorous discourse, ed. by Chlopicki, Wladyslaw, and Dorota Brzozowska, 93–105. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Humor in Language. Oxford: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2020. The Linguistics of Humor: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barros Grela, Eduardo. 2016. “American Anti-humor and 21st century Spanish Television Comedy.” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Philologia 61(3): 287–302.Google Scholar
Blanco, Xavier. 2010. Los frasemas composicionales pragmáticos. In Opacité, idiomaticité, traduction, ed. by Pedro Mogorrón and Salah Mejri, 19–32. Alicante: Universidad.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Microestrctura lexicográfica para unidades frásticas; los pragmatemas”. Kañina 38 (3): 13–18.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio. 2013. “Variación pragmática y coloquialización estratégica. El caso de algunos géneros televisivos (la tertulia).” In (Des)cortesía para el espectáculo, ed. by Carlos Fuentes Rodríguez, 89–125. Madrid: Arcos/Libros.Google Scholar
Burgers, Christian, and Margot van Mulken. 2017. “Humor Markers.” In The Routledge handbook of language and humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 385–399. London, New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castellón Alcalá, Heraclia. 2013. “Humor y tipos textuales. Los textos expositivos en los monólogos cómicos”. Humor, ironía y géneros textuales 11: 41–59.Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. 2017. “Interactional Humour and Spontaneity in TV Documentaries.” Lingua 1971: 34–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corpas, Gloria. 1996. Manual de fraseología española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Cowie, Anthony Paul. 1994. “Phraseology.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by R. E. Asher, 3168–3171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Camp, Elise. 2015. “Humoring the Audience: Performance Strategies and Persuasion in Midwestern American Stand-up Comedy.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Studies, 28 (3): 449–467.Google Scholar
Federal Communications Commission. Broadcast of Obscenity, Indecency, and Profanity. 2024. [URL]
Granger, Sylviane and Magali Paquot. 2008. “Disentangling the Phraseological Web. In Phraseology. An interdisciplinary perspective, ed. by Sylviane Granger and Fanny Meunier, 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2017. “Teasing.” In The Routledge handbook of language and humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 204–218. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keltner, Dacher, Lisa Capps, Ann M. Kring, Randall, C., and Erin A. Heerey. 2001. “Just Teasing: A Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Review. Psychological Bulletin 127 (2): 229–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Amanda, Barbara K. Kaye, and Mark D. Harmon. 2018. “Silly Meets Serious: Discourse Integration and the Stewart/Colbert era.” Comedy Studies 9 (2): 120–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinez Marín, Juan. 1999. Unidades léxicas complejas y unidades fraseológicas. In El neologismo, ed. by Jose Manuel González Calvo et al., 97–116. Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.Google Scholar
Melčuk, Igor. 1998. Collocations and lexical functions. In Phraseology: theory, analysis and applications, ed. by Anthony Paul Cowie, 23–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Clichés: An Understudied Class of Phrasemes.” Yearbook of Phraseology 61: 55–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Clichés and Pragmatemes.” Neophilologica 321: 9–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mir, Montserrat and Patxi Laskurain-Ibarluzea. 2022. “Spanish and English Verbal Humour: A comparative Study of Late-night Talk Show Monologues.” Contrastive Pragmatics 3 (2): 278–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pamies, Antonio. 2007. “De la idiomaticidad y sus paradojas”. In Nouveaux apports a l’etude des expressions figées, ed. by Germán Conde, 173–204. Cortil-Wodon: Inter Communications & E.M.E.Google Scholar
. 2014. “El algodón no engaña: algunas observaciones en la motivación en fraseología”. In Fraseología y paremiología: enfoques y aplicaciones, ed. by Vanda Durante, 33–55. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Grammatical Metaphor and Functional Idiomaticity.” Yearbook of Phraseology 81: 59–94.Google Scholar
. 2019. “La fraseología a través de su terminología”. In Estudios lingüísticos y culturales sobre China, ed. by Martín Ríos, 105–134. Granada: Comares.Google Scholar
Priego-Valverde, Béattice, Brigitte Bigi, Salvatore Attardo, Lucy Pickering, and Elisa Gironzetti. 2018. “Is Smiling During Humor so Obvious? A Cross-cultural Comparison of Smiling Behavior in Humorous Sequences in American English and French Interactions.” Special Issue: Conversational humor: Forms, functions and practices across cultures. Intercultural Pragmatics, 15 (4): 563–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor. 1997. Aspectos de fraseología teórica española. Valencia: Universidad.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Compuestos, colocaciones, locuciones: intento de delimitación”. In Lenguas e Lingüística: Léxico y Gramática, ed. by Alexandre Veiga, Miguel González and Montserrat Souto, 325–339. Lugo: Tristram.Google Scholar
. 2009. “La gramaticalizaci6n de unidades fraseológicas irónicas”. In Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproxi-mación pragmática a la ironía, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo and Xosé. A. Padilla Garcia, 371–390. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Apuntando maneras: El papel de la fraseología en el humor”. In Fraseopragmática, ed. by Inés Olza and Elvira Manero, 167–184. Berlin: Frank&Timme.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Phraseology for Humor in Spanish. Types, Functions and Discourses.” Lingusticae Investigationes 38 (2): 191–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Evidentiality and Humor in Spanish: About Buenafuente’s Monologues”. RESLA. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 3311: 303–326.Google Scholar
Scarpetta, Fabiola. and Anna Spagnolli. 2009. “The Interactional Context of Humor in Stand-up Comedy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (3): 210–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seizer, Susan. 2011. “On the Uses of Obscenity in Live Stand-Up Comedy.” Anthropological quarterly 84 (1): 209–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timofeeva, Larissa. 2012. El significado fraseológico: en torno a un modelo explicativo y aplicado. Madrid: Liceus.Google Scholar
Timofeeva, Larissa & Leornor Ruiz Gurillo. 2021. “Marcas e indicadores humorísticos en las narraciones escritas de niños y niñas de 8, 10 y 12 años en español. Propuesta tipológica”. Spanish in Context 18 (1): 83–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2016. Humor and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House.Google Scholar
Zuluaga, Alberto. 1980. Introducción al estudio de las expresiones fijas. Frankfurt a.M.: P.D. Lang.Google Scholar