Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 5:1 (2014) ► pp.76–104

(Im)politeness during Prime Minister’s Questions in the U.K. Parliament

Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) is a weekly, half-hour long session in the British House of Commons, which gives backbench Members of Parliament (MPs) and the Leader of the Opposition (LO) the opportunity to ask the Prime Minister (PM) questions on any topic relating to the government’s policies and actions. The discourse at PMQs is often described as adversarial (see Bull & Wells 2011) and in this paper I will show how the notion of impoliteness can be applied to both the questions and the answers which make up the session. Through the detailed analysis of six sessions of PMQs I will also demonstrate that PMQs is also a source of polite linguistic behaviour of the sort described in Brown & Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory. Comparisons between Gordon Brown’s and David Cameron’s speech styles will also be drawn.

Keywords: politeness, impoliteness, mitigation, community of practice, face-threatening acts, Prime Minister’s Questions, parliamentary discourse
Published online: 5 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.1.04mur
References
Bousfield, Derek & Miriam Locher (
eds) 2008  Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice .Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson.
1987 [1978]  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter & Pam Wells.
2011 ‘Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions’. A paper presented at the 12th International Pragmatics Conference , Manchester, 4th July 2011.Google Scholar
Chen, Rong.
2001 Self-politeness: A Proposal. Journal of Pragmatics 331, 87–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven, Marc Elliot, John Heritage & Laurie McDonald.
2007 When does the Watch­dog Bark? Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences. American Sociological Review 721, 23–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan.
1996 Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 251, 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 421, 3232–3245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011  Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield & Anne Wichmann.
2003 Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 351, 1545–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erskine May.
2004  Erskine May’s Treatise of the law, privileges, proceedings and usage of Parliament . 23rd edition. London: Butterworths Law.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving.
1981  Forms of Talk . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra.
2001 Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse. Discourse & Society 121, 451–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael.
2007 The Discursive Challenge to Politeness: An Interactional Alternative. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour and Culture 31, 295–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail.
2004 Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction. In: Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation , Gene Lerner (ed), 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Joni.
2007  Don’t Patronize me: How to Handle Condescending Remarks from a Co-worker and How Not to Set Yourself Up . (Pamphlet). Chicago: Telus Talk Business.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas.
1986  News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia.
2010 Strategic Uses of Parliamentary Forms of Address: The Case of the U. K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics 421, 885–911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William.
1972  Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey.
1983  Principles of Pragmatics . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen.
1988 Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Participation Framework. In: Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order , Paul Drew & Anthony Wootton (eds), 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Marshall-Andrews, Bob.
2011  Off Message: The Complete Antidote to Political Humbug . London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam.
2006  Introducing Sociolinguistics . London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rockwell, Patricia.
2000 Lower, Slower, Louder: Vocal Cues of Sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 291, 483–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen.
2000 Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis. In: Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures , Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed), 11–46. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
The Linguistic Politeness Research Group
(ed) 2011  Discursive Approaches to Politeness . Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen.
1990 The Many Faces of Facework. In: Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, Howard Giles and William Robinson (eds.), 209–226. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
2008 ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour and Culture 41, 169–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard.
2003  Politeness . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Convery, Alan, Pavielle Haines, James Mitchell & David C. W. Parker
2021. Questioning scrutiny: the effect of Prime Minister’s Questions on citizen efficacy and trust in parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 27:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan
2016. Impoliteness Strategies. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan & Claire Hardaker
2017. Impoliteness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan & Vittorio Tantucci
2021. The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity. Journal of Pragmatics 175 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2022. ‘For (…) a leader like this Prime Minister to talk about morals and morality is a disgrace’: offensive action, uptake and moral implications in the context of parliamentary debates. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Graham, Ruth
2019. The users of unparliamentary language in the New Zealand House of Representatives 1890 to 1950: A community of practice perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 149 ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka
2022. „Hańba w Sejmie” – zastosowanie modeli generatywnych do analizy debat parlamentarnych. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 13:2 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia
2018. Disagreeing without a ‘no’: How teachers indicate disagreement in a Hong Kong classroom. Journal of Pragmatics 137 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mollin, Sandra
2018. The use of face-threatening acts in the construction of in- and out-group identities in British parliamentary debates. In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78], ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, James
2015. Revisiting the apology as a speech act. Journal of Language and Politics 14:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, James
2016. Apologies made at the Leveson Inquiry. Pragmatics and Society 7:4 ► pp. 595 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, James
2019. Apologising. In The Discursive Construction of Blame, ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, James
2019. Openings: Terms, Conditions and Getting Started. In The Discursive Construction of Blame, ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Nowak, Bartholomäus
2019. Chapter 7. Impoliteness in parliamentary questions. In Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 84], ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Sealey, Alison & Stephen Bates
2016. Prime ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister's Questions 1979–2010: A corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 104 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Shaw, Sylvia
2020. Women, Language and Politics, DOI logo
Shephard, Mark & Daniel Braby
2020. Questions to the PM versus questions by the PM: an examination of the state and nature of ‘Punch and Judy’ politics during PMQs at Westminster. The Journal of Legislative Studies 26:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Tracy, Karen
2017. Facework and (Im)politeness in Political Exchanges. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 739 ff. DOI logo
Waddle, Maurice, Peter Bull & Jan R. Böhnke
2019. “He Is Just the Nowhere Man of British Politics”: Personal Attacks in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:1 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Walter, Annemarie & Željko Poljak
2023. Incivility from the UK Prime Minister’s Dispatch Box: A Comparative Study of PM Question Time Attacks, 2010–2020. In Political Debasement, ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Jennifer M.
2020. Naming candidates as preemptive discursive practice: The 2016 Taiwan presidential race. Journal of Pragmatics 166 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Politics of Person Reference [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 320], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.