Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) is a weekly, half-hour long session in the British House of Commons, which gives backbench Members of Parliament (MPs) and the Leader of the Opposition (LO) the opportunity to ask the Prime Minister (PM) questions on any topic relating to the government’s policies and actions. The discourse at PMQs is often described as adversarial (see Bull & Wells 2011) and in this paper I will show how the notion of impoliteness can be applied to both the questions and the answers which make up the session. Through the detailed analysis of six sessions of PMQs I will also demonstrate that PMQs is also a source of polite linguistic behaviour of the sort described in Brown & Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory. Comparisons between Gordon Brown’s and David Cameron’s speech styles will also be drawn.
Bousfield, Derek & Miriam Locher (eds). 2008. Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987 [1978]. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bull, Peter & Pam Wells. 2011. ‘Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions’. A paper presented at the 12th International Pragmatics Conference, Manchester, 4th July 2011.
Chen, Rong. 2001. Self-politeness: A Proposal. Journal of Pragmatics 331, 87–106.
Clayman, Steven, Marc Elliot, John Heritage & Laurie McDonald. 2007. When does the Watchdog Bark? Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences. American Sociological Review 721, 23–41.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 251, 349–367.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield & Anne Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 351, 1545–1579.
Erskine May. 2004. Erskine May’s Treatise of the law, privileges, proceedings and usage of Parliament. 23rd edition. London: Butterworths Law.
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Harris, Sandra. 2001. Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse. Discourse & Society 121, 451–472.
Haugh, Michael. 2007. The Discursive Challenge to Politeness: An Interactional Alternative. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour and Culture 31, 295–317.
Johnston, Joni. 2007. Don’t Patronize me: How to Handle Condescending Remarks from a Co-worker and How Not to Set Yourself Up. (Pamphlet). Chicago: Telus Talk Business.
Ilie, Cornelia. 2010. Strategic Uses of Parliamentary Forms of Address: The Case of the U. K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics 421, 885–911.
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Levinson, Stephen. 1988. Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Participation Framework. In: Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, Paul Drew & Anthony Wootton (eds), 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.
Marshall-Andrews, Bob. 2011. Off Message: The Complete Antidote to Political Humbug. London: Profile Books.
Rockwell, Patricia. 2000. Lower, Slower, Louder: Vocal Cues of Sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 291, 483–495.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis. In: Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures, Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed), 11–46. London: Continuum.
The Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.). 2011. Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Tracy, Karen. 1990. The Many Faces of Facework. In: Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, Howard Giles and William Robinson (eds.), 209–226. Chichester: Wiley.
Tracy, Karen. 2008. ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour and Culture 41, 169–191.
Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (28)
Cited by 28 other publications
Galais, Carol & Sandra Bermúdez
2024. Understanding Conflict Dynamics in Spanish Parliament: MPs’ Personality Traits and Attitudes Toward Conflict. American Behavioral Scientist
Serban, Ruxandra
2024. Conflictual behaviour in legislatures: Exploring and explaining adversarial remarks in oral questions to prime ministers. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 26:2 ► pp. 548 ff.
Zhang, Huiyu, Junxiang Zhao & Yicheng Wu
2024. Disagreeing without tears. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 518 ff.
Bataineh, Rula Fahmi , Ruba F. Bataineh & Lara K. Andraws
2023. How Polite can Impoliteness be? A Jordanian Gendered Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies► pp. 16 ff.
Reber, Elisabeth
2023. On the ritualization of commemorative practices: Paying tribute in British Prime Minister's Questions. Journal of Pragmatics 214 ► pp. 92 ff.
Walter, Annemarie & Željko Poljak
2023. Incivility from the UK Prime Minister’s Dispatch Box: A Comparative Study of PM Question Time Attacks, 2010–2020. In Political Debasement, ► pp. 69 ff.
Fetzer, Anita
2022. ‘For (…) a leader like this Prime Minister to talk about morals and morality is a disgrace’: offensive action, uptake and moral implications in the context of parliamentary debates. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 135 ff.
Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka
2022. „Hańba w Sejmie” – zastosowanie modeli generatywnych do analizy debat parlamentarnych. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 13:2 ► pp. 82 ff.
Convery, Alan, Pavielle Haines, James Mitchell & David C. W. Parker
2021. Questioning scrutiny: the effect of Prime Minister’s Questions on citizen efficacy and trust in parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 27:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan & Vittorio Tantucci
2021. The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity. Journal of Pragmatics 175 ► pp. 146 ff.
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 64 ff.
Shaw, Sylvia
2020. Women, Language and Politics,
Shephard, Mark & Daniel Braby
2020. Questions to the PM versus questions by the PM: an examination of the state and nature of ‘Punch and Judy’ politics during PMQs at Westminster. The Journal of Legislative Studies 26:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Wei, Jennifer M.
2020. Naming candidates as preemptive discursive practice: The 2016 Taiwan presidential race. Journal of Pragmatics 166 ► pp. 84 ff.
Graham, Ruth
2019. The users of unparliamentary language in the New Zealand House of Representatives 1890 to 1950: A community of practice perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 149 ► pp. 14 ff.
2019. “He Is Just the Nowhere Man of British Politics”: Personal Attacks in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia
2018. Disagreeing without a ‘no’: How teachers indicate disagreement in a Hong Kong classroom. Journal of Pragmatics 137 ► pp. 1 ff.
2017. Impoliteness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 199 ff.
Tracy, Karen
2017. Facework and (Im)politeness in Political Exchanges. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 739 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2016. Impoliteness Strategies. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 421 ff.
Sealey, Alison & Stephen Bates
2016. Prime ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister's Questions 1979–2010: A corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 104 ► pp. 18 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.