Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 5:1 (2014) ► pp.105–127

Standardisation of Reduced Forms in English in an Academic Community of Practice

The process of standardising reduced forms in English, such as clippings and informal forms, used in academic chat discourse is the focus of this article. Textchat data from an introductory MA linguistics course run by a university in Sweden involving non-native English-speaking students and their native English-speaking teachers is analysed to identify if any forms are standardised. Topic-specific forms are seen to be standardised as much as are high frequency forms, although few have been standardised. It is the students above all who lead the process, and the teachers do not have much influence even if they use a different reduction.
Keywords: computer-mediated communication, textchat, community of practice, standardisation, reduced form, salience
Published online: 5 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.1.05whi
References (31)
Bach, Kent and Robert Harnish. 1979/1982. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley. 2012. World Englishes and linguistic landscapes. World Englishes 31, 1: 30–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley, David Graddol and Rajend Mesthrie. 2011. Editorial. English Today 27, 4: 2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collet, Milena and Nancy Belmore. 1996. Electronic language: A new variety of English. In Susan C. Herring (ed.), 13–28.
Davies, Bethan. 2005. Communities of practice: Legitimacy not choice. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9, 4: 557–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen, Hans Brunner and Greg Whittlemore. 1991. Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication 8, 1: 8–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. (ed.) 1996. Computer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2000. Introduction: Non-standard orthography and non-standard speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4, 4: 497–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Carmen. 2002. Literacy practices in computer-mediated communication in Hong Kong. The Reading Matrix 2, 2: 1–25.Google Scholar
Lotherington, Heather and Yejun Xu. 2004. How to chat in English and Chinese: Emerging digital language conventions. ReCALL 16, 2: 308–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Denise. 2000. Protean communication: The language of computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly 34, 3: 397–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolle, Steve and Billy Clark. 1998. Phatic interpretations: Standardisation and conventionalisation. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 111: 183–191.Google Scholar
Noh, Eun-Jo. 2000. Metarepresentation . Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2005. On the phatic interpretation of utterances: A complementary Relevance-theoretic proposal. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 181: 227–246.Google Scholar
2007. Phatic utterances and the communication of social information: 
A Relevance-theoretic approach. In Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Manuel Padilla Cruz, 
R. Gómez Morón & L. Fernández Amaya (eds.), Studies in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics , 112–129. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Pérez-Sabater, Carmen, Gemma Peña-Martínez, Ed Turney and Begoña Montero-Fleta. 2008. A spoken genre gets written. Online football commentaries in English, French and Spanish. Written Communication 25, 2: 235–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Randall, Neil. 2002. Lingo online: A report on the language of the keyboard generation. Accessed at: [URL]
Rintel, E. Sean and Jeffery Pittam. 1997. Strangers in a strange land: Interaction management on internet relay chat. Human Communication Research 231: 507–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1996. The Construction of Social Reality . London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2005. Child null subjects. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 171: 1–25.Google Scholar
2006. When less is more: Implicit arguments and Relevance Theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 181: 139–170.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance Theory: Communication and Cognition . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stainton, Robert. 2006. Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis and the Philosophy of Lang­uage . Oxford: Clarendon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werry, Christopher C. 1996. Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In Susan C. Herring (ed.), 47–63.
White, Jonathan R. 2011. Reduced forms in chat discourse. In Antti Ylikiiskilä and Maria Westman (eds). Language for the Future: Papers from the ASLA Symposium in Falun 12–13 November, 2010 , 231–247.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. The pragmatics of reduced forms. Forthcoming in a thematic volume from the 2011 Meaning, Context and Cognition conference at University of Lódz, Poland.
Widdowson, H. G. 1994. The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly 28, 2: 377–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2011. Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žegarac, Vladimir. 1998. What is phatic communication?. In Villy Rouchota & Andreas Jucker (eds.), Current Issues in Relevance Theory , 327–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2016. Some directions for future research in relevance-theoretic pragmatics. In Relevance Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 268], ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
White, Jonathan R.
2015. Processes and variations in language economisation. Ampersand 2 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
White, Jonathan R.
2018. Negotiating Local Norms in Online Communication. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition, ► pp. 1217 ff. DOI logo
White, Jonathan R.
2019. Local Norms in CALL Language Practice. In Computer-Assisted Language Learning, ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
White, Jonathan R.
2019. Marking Online Community Membership: The Pragmatics of Stance-taking. In Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 20], ► pp. 535 ff. DOI logo
White, Jonathan R.
2019. Negotiating Local Norms in Online Communication. In Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Media and Communications [Advances in Multimedia and Interactive Technologies, ], ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
White, Jonathan R.
2022. Reduction in and out of context. Pragmatics and Society 13:4 ► pp. 555 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Negotiating Reduced Forms. In Exploration of Textual Interactions in CALL Learning Communities [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Background From the Literature. In Exploration of Textual Interactions in CALL Learning Communities [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Introduction, Data, and Methodology. In Exploration of Textual Interactions in CALL Learning Communities [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.