Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 5:2 (2014) ► pp.165–190

From paper to practice

Asking and responding to a standardized question item in performance appraisal interviews

| Uppsala University, Sweden
| Karlstad University, Sweden

This paper examines how a standardized question is launched and received in a corpus of performance appraisal interviews, with a focus on how pre-­formulated questions are translated into interaction. Using conversation analysis, we demonstrate that the same question becomes many different actions in practice. Prefaces as well as prosodic and lexical alterations make relevant different responses, and as such, the question can be recruited to initiate diverse interactional projects such as assessments and other socially delicate activities. As a consequence, goals of uniformity and standardization may be subverted. The interactional adaptations further evidence the strength of recipient design as reformulations also result in more fitted and personalized answers. Our study contributes to the understanding of standardization versus interactionalization, and points to the strong interrelationship between question design and the fitting of response options.

Keywords: question design, standardization, performance appraisal interview, template, assessment, conversation analysis
Published online: 25 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.2.01nyr
References
Adams, Katherine
1981 Question/Answer adjacency pairs in a performance appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Communication Research 9 (2), 72–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles
1999 Assessing quality of life of persons with a learning disability: how setting lower standards may inflate well-being scores. Qualitative Health Research 91, 437–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Personalized revision of ‘failed’ questions. Discourse Studies 4 (4), 411–428.Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles
(Ed.) (2011 Applied conversation analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, Birte
2006 En undersøgelse om medarbejderudviklingssamtaler i en større dansk virksomhed. Aarhus School of Business: Center for Virksomhedskommunikation.Google Scholar
2008 Performance appraisal interviews. Preference organization in assessment sequences. Journal of Business Communication 45 (4), 408–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Michael & Lea P. Stewart
2009 Conversing about performance. Discursive resources for the appraisal interview. Management Communication Quarterly 22 (3), 473–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1979 Footing. Semiotica 251, 1–29. [Reprinted in Goffman 1981.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom
1979 Social Being: A Theory for Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Steven Clayman
2010 Talk in Action: Interaction, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
1994 Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society 231, 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke
1996 Probing behaviors of interviewers in the standardized semi-open research interview. Quality and Quantity 301, 591–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: the Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke & Charles Antaki
1997 Creating happy people by asking Yes-No questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (4), 285–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian & Robin Wooffitt
1998 Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lazaraton, Anne
2002 A Qualitative Approach to the Validation of Oral Langauge Tests. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
1988 Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, Paul Drew & Anthony Wootton (eds.), 161–227. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lindgren, Maria
2001 Utvecklingssamtal mellan chefer och medarbetare. Undersökning av en samtalstyp i arbetslivet. [Staff development talks between managers and employees. A study of an interaction type in working life.] Lund University, Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap, A 56.Google Scholar
Marlaire, Courtney L. & Douglas W. Maynard
1990 Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education 631, 83–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. & Nora Cate Schaeffer
2000 Toward a sociology of scientific knowledge: survey research and ethnomethodology’s asymmetric alternates. Social Studies of Science 301, 323–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & Johannes Van der Zouwen
(eds) 2002 Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Kazuko
1999 And-prefaced questions in institutional discourse. Linguistics 37(2), 251–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, Aslaug
1998 Medarbetarsamtal och lärande i organisationer. [Performance appraisal interviews and learning in organizations]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Nevile, Maurice
2006 Making sequentiality salient: and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots. Discourse Studies 81, 279–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nyroos, Lina
2012 The Social Organization of Institutional Norms: The Interactional Management of Knowledge, Entitlement and Stance. Dissertation. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi & Sanna Vehviläinen
2003 Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society 14 (6), 727–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1980 Telling my side: ‘limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry 501, 186–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversational Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan
2003 Studying the standardized survey as interaction. Qualitative Research 3 (2), 269–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Alexa Hepburn
2005 Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology 21, 281–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Life is out there: A comment on Griffin. Discourse Studies 9 (2), 276–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapley, Tim
2001 The artfulness of open-ended interviewing: some considerations on analyzing interviews. Qualitative Research 11, 303–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Interviews. In Qualitative Research Practice, Clive Seale, Giampietro Gobo, Jaber F. Gubrium & David Silverman (eds), 15–33. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roulston, Kathryn
2006 Close encounters of the ‘CA’ kind: a review of literature analyzing talk in research interviews. Qualitative Research 6 (4), 515–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation, Volume II1. In Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation. Edited by Gail Jefferson; with an introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50 (4), 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandlund, Erica, Christina Olin-Scheller, Lina Nyroos, Liselotte Jakobsen & Cecilia Nahnfeldt
2011 The performance appraisal interview – An arena for the reinforcement of norms for employeeship. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 1 (2), 59–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Nora Cate & Stanley Presser
2003 The science of asking questions. Annual Review of Sociology 291, 65–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
2001 Getting serious: Joke → serious ‘no’. Journal of Pragmatics 331, 1947–1955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherp, Hans-Åke, Gun-Britt Scherp, Per-Olov Johansson & Eva Jönsson
2004 Lärande medarbetarsamtal. [Learning employee development talks.] Karlstad: Karlstad University. Google Scholar
Seedhouse, Paul & Egbert, Maria
2006 The interactional organization of the IELTS speaking test. IELTS Research Reports 61, 161–205.Google Scholar
Silverman, David
2001 Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig
2011 Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy & Brigitte Jordan
1990 Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews. Journal of the American Statistical Association 851, 232–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Melander Bowden, Helen & Erica Sandlund
2019. Knowledge talk in performance appraisal interviews. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 21 ► pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Mohd Noh, Muhamad Firdaus & Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore
2022. Rater severity differences in English language as a second language speaking assessment based on rating experience, training experience, and teaching experience through many-faceted Rasch measurement analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Previtali, Federica & Simona Spedale
2021. Doing age in the workplace: Exploring age categorisation in performance appraisal. Journal of Aging Studies 59 ► pp. 100981 ff. DOI logo
Pulido, Cristina M., Ana Vidu, Sandra Racionero-Plaza & Lídia Puigvert
2021. I Do It, but I Decide With Whom. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Sandlund, Erica
2014. Prescribing conduct: Enactments of talk or thought in advice-giving sequences. Discourse Studies 16:5 ► pp. 645 ff. DOI logo
Sandlund, Erica, Pia Sundqvist & Lina Nyroos
2016. Testing L2 Talk: A Review of Empirical Studies on Second‐Language Oral Proficiency Testing. Language and Linguistics Compass 10:1 ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Sundqvist, Pia, Peter Wikström, Erica Sandlund & Lina Nyroos
2018. The teacher as examiner of L2 oral tests: A challenge to standardization. Language Testing 35:2 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.