Mark Dingemanse | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Ideophones are found in many of the world’s languages. Though they are a major word class on a par with nouns and verbs, their origins are ill-understood, and the question of ideophone creation has been a source of controversy. This paper studies ideophone creation in naturally occurring speech. New, unconventionalised ideophones are identified using native speaker judgements, and are studied in context to understand the rules and regularities underlying their production and interpretation. People produce and interpret new ideophones with the help of the semiotic infrastructure that underlies the use of existing ideophones: foregrounding frames certain stretches of speech as depictive enactments of sensory imagery, and various types of iconicity link forms and meanings. As with any creative use of linguistic resources, context and common ground also play an important role in supporting rapid ‘good enough’ interpretations of new material. The making of new ideophones is a special case of a more general phenomenon of creative depiction: the art of presenting verbal material in such a way that the interlocutor recognises and interprets it as a depiction.
2009The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Enfield, N.J
2011 “Sources of Asymmetry in Human Interaction: Enchrony, Status, Knowledge, and Agency.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferreira, Fernanda, and Nikole D. Patson
2007 “The ‘Good Enough’Approach to Language Comprehension.” Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (1–2): 71–83.
Fortune, G
1971 “Some Notes on Ideophones and Ideophonic Constructions in Shona.” African Studies 30 (3): 237–258.
Gombrich, E.H
2002Art & Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. (6th ed.). London & New York: Phaidon.
Haspelmath, Martin
2010 “Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies.” Language 86 (3): 663–687.
Heine, Bernd
1997Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Hughes, David W
2000 “No Nonsense: The Logic and Power of Acoustic-Iconic Mnemonic Systems.” British Journal of Ethnomusicology 9 (2): 93–120.
Hymes, Dell H
1985 “Some Subtleties of Measured Verse.” In Proceedings, Niagara Linguistic Society, 15th Spring Conference, ed. by June Hesch, 13–57. Buffalo: State University of New York.
Jakobson, Roman, and Linda R. Waugh
1979The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2010 “Bodily Quoting in Dance Correction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (4): 401–426.
Keller, Rudi
1998A Theory of Linguistic Signs. Trans by. Duenwald Kimberley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kendon, Adam
2004Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klassen, Doreen Helen
1999“You Can’t Have Silence with Your Palms Up: Ideophones, Gesture, and Iconicity in Zimbabwean Shona Women’s Ngano (Storysong) Performance.” Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Kunene, Daniel P
1965 “The Ideophone in Southern Sotho.” Journal of African Languages 41: 19–39.
McNeill, David
1992Hand and Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Noss, Philip A
2001 “Ideas, Phones and Gbaya Verbal Art.” In Ideophones, ed. by F.K. Erhard Voeltz, and Christa Kilian-Hatz, 259–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nuckolls, Janis B
1996Sounds Like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nuckolls, Janis B
2004 “To Be or To Be Not Ideophonically Impoverished.” In SALSA XI: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society, Austin, ed. by Wai Fong Chiang, Elaine Chun, Laura Mahalingappa, and Siri Mehus, 131–142. Austin: University of Texas.
Samarin, William J
1970 “Inventory and Choice in Expressive Language.” Word 261: 153–169.
Samarin, William J
1971 “Survey of Bantu Ideophones.” African Language Studies 121: 130–168.
Schelling, Thomas C
1960The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Selting, Margret
1994 “Emphatic Speech Style – with Special Focus on the Prosodic Signalling of Heightened Emotive Involvement in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 22 (3–4): 375–408. .
Shintel, Hadas, Howard C. Nusbaum, and Arika Okrent
2006 “Analog Acoustic Expression in Speech Communication.” Journal of Memory and Language 55 (2): 167–177.
Sundberg, Johan
1994 “Musical Significance of Musicians’ Syllable Choice in Improvised Nonsense Text Singing: A Preliminary Study.” Phonetica 51 (1–3): 132–145.
Taylor, Kevin J
2006KA-BOOM! A Dictionary of Comic Book Words, Symbols & Onomatopoeia. Mora Publications, November 1.
von Staden, Paul M.S
1977 “Some Remarks on Ideophones in Zulu.” African Studies 36 (2): 195–224.
Walton, Kendall L
1973 “Pictures and Make-Believe.” The Philosophical Review 82 (3): 283–319.
Welmers, William E
1973African Language Structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Werner, Heinz, and Bernard Kaplan
1963Symbol Formation; An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought. New York: Wiley.
Westermann, Diedrich Hermann
1927 “Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen.” In Festschrift Meinhof, ed. by Franz Boas, 315–328. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen.
Ziervogel, D
1952A Grammar of Swazi. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.
Zwicky, Arnold M., and Geoffrey K. Pullum
1987 “Plain Morphology and Expressive Morphology.” In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by John Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis, and Hana Filip, 71, 330–340. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Cited by
Cited by 21 other publications
Albert, Saul & Dirk vom Lehn
2023. Non-lexical vocalizations help novices learn joint embodied actions. Language & Communication 88 ► pp. 1 ff.
Beukeleers, Inez & Myriam Vermeerbergen
2022. Show Me What You’ve B/Seen: A Brief History of Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 13
2020. Playful iconicity: structural markedness underlies the relation between funniness and iconicity. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 203 ff.
Edmiston, Pierce, Marcus Perlman & Gary Lupyan
2018. Repeated imitation makes human vocalizations more word-like. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285:1874 ► pp. 20172709 ff.
Enfield, N.J.
2015. Linguistic Relativity from Reference to Agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 44:1 ► pp. 207 ff.
Ferrara, Lindsay & Gabrielle Hodge
2018. Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Keevallik, Leelo
2021. Vocalizations in dance classes teach body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4
McLean, Bonnie
2021. Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology 25:3 ► pp. 507 ff.
Nomikou, Iris
2023. Joining actions through effort sounds: Mothers and infants in routine activities. Language & Communication 91 ► pp. 32 ff.
Nuckolls, Janis B., Tod D. Swanson, Diana Shelton, Alexander Rice & Sarah Hatton
2017. Lexicography in-your-face: The active semantics of Pastaza Quichua ideophones. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 62:2 ► pp. 154 ff.
Perlman, Marcus, Hannah Little, Bill Thompson & Robin L. Thompson
2018. Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Perry, Lynn K., Marcus Perlman, Gary Lupyan & Johan J Bolhuis
2015. Iconicity in English and Spanish and Its Relation to Lexical Category and Age of Acquisition. PLOS ONE 10:9 ► pp. e0137147 ff.
Styles, Suzy J. & Lauren Gawne
2017. When Does Maluma/Takete Fail? Two Key Failures and a Meta-Analysis Suggest That Phonology and Phonotactics Matter. i-Perception 8:4 ► pp. 204166951772480 ff.
Taitz, Alan, M. Florencia Assaneo, Natalia Elisei, Mónica Trípodi, Laurent Cohen, Jacobo D. Sitt, Marcos A. Trevisan & Niels O. Schiller
2018. The audiovisual structure of onomatopoeias: An intrusion of real-world physics in lexical creation. PLOS ONE 13:3 ► pp. e0193466 ff.
Thompson, Arthur L., May Pik Yu Chan, Ping Hei Yeung & Youngah Do
2021. Iconicity and Second Language Visual Perception: A Psycholinguistic Study of English Imitative Words at Different De-iconization Stages. Mathematics 9:12 ► pp. 1331 ff.
Winter, Bodo, Marcus Perlman, Lynn K. Perry & Gary Lupyan
2017. Which words are most iconic?. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 443 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.