Cover not available
Article published In:
Ideophones: Between Grammar and Poetry
Edited by Katherine Lahti, Rusty Barrett and Anthony K. Webster
[Pragmatics and Society 5:3] 2014
► pp. 455–483

Femininity in mixed-sex talk and intercultural communication

Are Japanese women polite and submissive?

| Hong Kong Baptist University

Previous studies of language and gender discuss how men and women use gender-specific conversational styles mainly in relation to English, whereas similar studies for Asian languages remain comparatively few. Moreover, little is known about gender and conversational styles during intercultural communication. This paper explores whether speakers follow similar norms of politeness in mixed-sex talk in their L1 and in intercultural conversations in L2 English, and if femininities are modified, what factors may be involved. It reports findings from a case study of a Japanese female’s conversations with a Japanese male in Japanese and with three male L2 English speakers. It suggests that femininities might be modified to become more ‘immodest’ in English due to factors such as speakers’ varying level of adherence to native cultural norms in L1 and in L2 contexts and the male interlocutors’ ethnicity. For example, female speakers who adhere to native cultural norms in L1 conversations may see L2 intercultural contexts as opportunities to create non-traditional femininities, especially when there is no male interlocutor with shared ethnicity. The construction of L2 femininities may also be shaped by linguistic factors such as L2 proficiency or systemic differences between the two languages.

Keywords: femininity, submissiveness, linguistic relativity, politeness, Japanese, intercultural communication, gender, mixed-sex talk
Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.3.09ita
References
Abe, Hideko Normes
1995 “From Stereotype to Context: The Study of Japanese Women’s Speech.” Feminist Studies 21 (3): 647–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Speaking of Power: Japanese Professional Women and Their Speeches. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Geoffrey Leech
2002 The Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1989 “Gossip Revisited: Language in All-female Groups.” In Women in their Speech Communities, ed. by Jennifer Coates and Deborah Cameron, 94–122. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2004 Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Sex Differences in Language. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
2007 “Talk in a Play Frame: More on Laughter and Intimacy.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (1): 29–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
2003 Language and Gender. New York: 
Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Pamela
1983 “Interaction: The Work Women Do.” In Language, Gender, and Society, ed. by Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae, and Nancy Henley, 89–101. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Freed, Alice, and Alice Greenwood
1996 Women, Men, and Type of talk: What Makes the Difference?” Language in Society 25 (1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J., and Stephen Levinson
1996 Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2007 “Emic Conceptualizations of (im)politeness and Face in Japanese: Implications for the Discursive Negotiation of Second Language Learner Identities.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 657–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1984 “Hedging Your Bets and Sitting on the Fence: Some Evidence for Hedges as Support Structures.” Te Reo 271: 47–62.Google Scholar
1997 “Women, Language, and Identity.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 1 (2): 195–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Sharing a Laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humor and Gender in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (1): 26–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Miriam Meyerhoff
2003 The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Sharon Marsden, and Meredith Marra
2013 “Doing Leadership: One Aspect of Sociopragmatic Competence at Work.” Pragmatics and Society 4 (1): 26–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Stephanie Schnurr
2006 “Doing Femininity at Work: More than Just Relational Practice.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (1): 31–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
1982 “Japanese Sociolinguistics: Politeness and Women’s Language.” Lingua 57 (2–4): 357–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 “How and Why Do Women Speak More Politely in Japanese.” In Aspects of Japanese Women’s Language, ed. by Sachiko Ide and Naomi Hanaoka McGloin, 63–79. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko, and Megumi Yoshida
1999 “Sociolinguistics: Honorifics and Gender Differences.” In The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, ed. by Naoko Tsujimura, 444–480. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Inoue, Miyako
2006 Vicarious Language: Gender and Linguistic Modernity in Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itakura, Hiroko
2001 Conversational Dominance and Gender. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itakura, Hiroko, and Amy B.M. Tsui
2004 “Gender and Conversational Dominance in Japanese Conversation.” Language in Society 33 (2): 223–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, Deborah, and Janice Drakich
1993 “Understanding Gender Differences in Amount of Talk: A Critical Review of Research.” In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 281–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, and Judith M. Bean
1997 “Self-expression and Linguistic Variation.” Language in Society 26 (2): 221–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kollock, Peter, Philip Blumstein, and Pepper Schwartz
1985 “Sex and Power in Interaction: Conversational Privileges and Duties.” American Sociological Review 501: 34–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladegaard, Hans J
2012 “Rudeness as a Discursive Strategy in Leadership Discourse: Culture, Power, and Gender in a Hong Kong Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1661–1679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2007 “Politeness: Is there an East-West Divide?” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture 3 (2): 167–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, Cynthia B
2009 “Collaborative Narration in Preadolescent Girl Talk: A Saturday Luncheon Conversation among Three Friends.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (7): 1341–1357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen, and David P. Wilkins
2006 Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makino, Seiichi, and Michio Tsutsui
1986 A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: Japan Times.Google Scholar
Maltz, Daniel N., and Ruth A. Borker
1982 “A Cultural Approach to Male-female Miscommunication.” In Language and Social Identity, ed. by John J. Gumperz, 196–216. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
1988 “Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 12 (4): 403–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko K
1990 An Introduction to Japanese Grammar and Communication Strategies. Tokyo: The Japan Times.Google Scholar
1997 Japanese Communication. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morita, Emi
2012 “Dividing the Socio-pragmatic Meanings of the Japanese Interactional Particle ne .” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (3): 298–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, and Carolyn Taylor
1993 “Mothers’ Role in the Everyday Reconstruction of “Father Knows Best”.” In Locating Power: Proceedings of the 1992 Berkeley Women Language Conference, ed. by Kira Hall, 447–462. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Ruth Smith, and Carolyn Taylor
1996 “Detective Stories at Dinner-time: Problem Solving through Co-narration.” In Disorderly Discourse: Narrative, Conflict, and Inequity, ed. by Charles Briggs, 95–113. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okada, Misao
2006 “Speaker’s Sex or Discourse Activities? A Micro-discourse-based Account of Usage of Non-particle Questions in Japanese.” Language in Society 35 (3): 341–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
1995 ““Tasteless” Japanese: Less “Feminine” Speech among Young Japanese Women.” In Gender Articulated Language and the Socially Constructed Self, ed. by Kira Hall and Mary Bucholtz, 297–325. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2010 “Politeness in East Asia.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 71–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011 “The Use and Interpretation of Addressee Honorifics and Plain Forms in Japanese: Diversity, Multiplicity, and Ambiguity.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (15): 3673–3688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Variability in Societal Norms for Japanese Women’s Speech: Implications for Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua 32 (2): 203–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko, and Janet Shibamoto Smith
2004 Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008 “Constructing Linguistic Femininity in Contemporary Japan: Scholarly and Popular Representations.” Gender and Language 2 (1): 87–112.Google Scholar
Pichler, Pia
2006 “Multifunctional Teasing as a Resource for Identity Construction in the Talk of British Bangladeshi Girls.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (2): 225–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peng, Fred C.C., and Makoto Hori
1981 Nihongo no danjosa [Male/female differences in Japanese]. Tokyo: East-West Sign Language Association.Google Scholar
Saito, Junko
2010 “Subordinates’ Use of Japanese Plain Forms: An Examination of Superior-subordinate Interactions in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (12): 3271–3282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Managing Confrontational Situations: Japanese Male Superiors’ Interactional Styles in Directive Discourse in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (6): 1689–1706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Janet
1992 “Women in Charge: Politeness and Directives in the Speech of Japanese Women.” Language in Society 21 (1): 59–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibamoto Smith, Janet
2004 “Language and Gender in the (hetero)romance: “Reading” the Ideal hero/ine through Lovers’ Dialogue in Japanese Romance Fiction.” In Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People, ed. by Shigeko Okamoto and Janet S. Shibamoto Smith, 113–130. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SturtzSreetharan, Cindi L
2006 “Gentlemanly Gender? Japanese Men’s Use of Clausal-final Politeness in Casual Conversations.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (1): 70–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talbot, Mary
2010 Language and Gender. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko
2000 “The Particle Ne as a Turn-management Device in Japanese Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (8): 1135–1176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takano, Shoji
2005 “Re-examining Linguistic Power: Strategic Uses of Directives by Professional Japanese Women in Positions of Authority and Leadership.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (5): 633–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1990 You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
1993 Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004 “Talking the Dog: Framing Pets as Interactional Resources in Family Discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (4): 399–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terao, Rumi
1996 “Homekotoba e no hentou sutairu” [Styles in responses to compliments]. Nihongogaku 15 (5): 81–88.Google Scholar
Weedon, Chris
1987 Feminist Theory and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Duque, Elena, Patricia Melgar, Sara Gómez-Cuevas & Garazi López de Aguileta
2021. “Tell Someone,” to Both Women and Men. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Valls-Carol, Rosa, Antonio Madrid-Pérez, Barbara Merrill & Guillermo Legorburo-Torres
2021. “Come on! He Has Never Cooked in His Life!” New Alternative Masculinities Putting Everything in Its Place. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Zubiri-Esnaola, Harkaitz, Nerea Gutiérrez-Fernández & Mengna Guo
2021. “No More Insecurities”: New Alternative Masculinities' Communicative Acts Generate Desire and Equality to Obliterate Offensive Sexual Statements. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.