Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 6:1 (2015) ► pp.6788
References
Antaki, Charles
2008 “Formulations in Psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles, Rebecca Barnes, and Ivan Leudar
2005 “Diagnostic Formulations in Psychotherapy.” Discourse Studies 7 (6): 627–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage
1984 “Transcript Notation.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, ix–xvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
2012 “Exploring Essentially Three-turn Courses of Action: An Institutional Case Study with Implications for Ordinary Talk.” Discourse Studies 14 (3): 217–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi, Jeffrey D. Robinson, and Jenny Mandelbaum
2011 “Extending the Notion of Pragmatic Completion: The Case of the Compound Action Unit.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3844–3859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina
2010 “ ‘Articulating the Unsaid’ via And-prefaced Formulations of Other’s Talk.” Discourse Studies 12 (1): 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992 “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
2003 “Precision and Exaggeration in Interaction.” American Sociological Review 681: 917–938. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson
1996 “lnteractional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 134–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimmons, James A., and Mona J. Fitzsimmons
1998Service Management: Operations, Strategy, and Information Technology (2nd edition). Boston, Mass.: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara
1995The Dynamics of Service: Reflections on the Changing Nature of Customer/Provider Interactions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change of State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1985“Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 31, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 95–119. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Tanya Stivers
1999 “Online Commentary in Acute Medical Visits: A Method of Shaping Patient Expectations.” Social Science and Medicine 49 (11): 1501–1517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Rod D. Watson
1979 “Formulations as Conversational Objects.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
2005 “Active Listening: Formulations and the Elicitation of Feelings-talk in Child Counseling.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (3): 303–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell
1983The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “A Sketch of Some Orderly Aspects of Overlap in Natural Conversation.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 43–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel
1977Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lam, Phoenix
2010 “Toward a Functional Framework for Discourse Particles: A Comparison of ‘Well’ and ‘So’.” Text & Talk 30 (6): 657–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene
2004 “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 151–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1992 “Activity Type and Language.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W
1992 “On clinicians co-implicating recipients’ perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news.” In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 331–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Mie Femø, Søren Beck Nielsen, Gitte Gravengaard, and Brian Due
2012 “Interactional Functions of Invoking Procedure in Institutional Settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1457–1473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Normann, Richard
1984Service Management: Strategy and Leadership in Service Business (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi
2011 “After Interpretation: Third-position Utterances in Psychoanalysis.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (3): 288–316.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1986 “Extreme case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 91: 219–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structures of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004“Prompting Action: The Stand-alone ‘So’ in Sequences of Talk-in-Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 73 (2): 185–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and John Heritage
2005 “The Structure of Patients’ Presenting Concerns: The Completion Relevance of Current Symptoms.” Social Science & Medicine 611: 481–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1988 “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony J. Wootton, 89–135. 
Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Sandra Thompson and Emanuel A. Schegloff, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “On Complainability”. Social Problems 52 (3): 449–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers: Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steensig, Jakob, and Tine Larsen
2008 “Affilliative and Disaffillative Uses of You Say x Questions.” Discourse Studies 10 (1): 113–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2005 “Non-antibiotic Treatment Recommendations: Delivery Formats and Implications for Parent Resistance.” Social Science & Medicine 601: 949–946. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Don
1992 “The interactional organization of calls c::/ for emergency assistance.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006 “How closing matters in emergency calls.” Paper presented at the 
Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association , Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Boginskaya, Olga
2022. Popularizing in legal discourse: What efforts do Russian judges make to facilitate juror’s comprehension of law-related contents?. Discourse Studies 24:5  pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Jessie & Scott Barnes
2020. Giving information in cosmetics sales interactions: Exploring some interactional functions of the Mandarin response token dui. Journal of Pragmatics 159  pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Herijgers, Marloes & Tessa van Charldorp
2021. Communicating information packages in institutional face-to-face consultations. Discourse Studies 23:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Kent, Alexandra & Charles Antaki
2020. Police Call-takers' First Substantive Question Projects the Outcome of the Call. Applied Linguistics 41:5  pp. 640 ff. DOI logo
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi
2015. What Can You Do for Me? Communication Methods Customers Use to Solicit Personalization within the Service Encounter. Communication Monographs 82:4  pp. 510 ff. DOI logo
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi
2015. Working the overall structural organization of a call: How customers use third position as leverage for gaining service representatives' assistance in dealing with service problems. Language & Communication 43  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi
2018. The interactional work of suppressing complaints in customer service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 123  pp. 102 ff. DOI logo
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
2019. Chapter 5. Navigating commercial constraints in a service call. In Technology Mediated Service Encounters [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 300],  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Orthaber, Sara
2023. Routine Calls for Information and Request Emails. In (Im)politeness at a Slovenian Call Centre [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ],  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Orthaber, Sara & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2016. When routine calls for information become interpersonally sensitive. Pragmatics and Society 7:4  pp. 638 ff. DOI logo
Sikveland, Rein Ove & Elizabeth Stokoe
2017. Enquiry calls to GP surgeries in the United Kingdom: Expressions of incomplete service and dissatisfaction in closing sequences. Discourse Studies 19:4  pp. 441 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.