Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 6:1 (2015) ► pp.89116
References
Auer, Peter
2007 “Syntax als Prozess.” In Gespräch als Prozess. Linguistische Aspekte der Zeitlichkeit verbaler Interaktion, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf, 95–124. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bamford, Julia
2000You Can Say That Again. Repetition in Discourse. Bologna: CLUEB.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
2011 “Redundancy, Repetition, and Intensity in Discourse”. Language Sciences 331: 243–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
1980 “Semantic Structure and Illocutionary Force.” In Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, John R. Searle, and Manfred Bierwisch, 1–35. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borg, Emma
2005 “Saying What You Mean: Unarticulated Constituents and Communication.” In Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech, ed. by Reinaldo Elugardo and Robert J. Stainton, 237–262. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Margareta
1996 “Subordination und Parenthese als Mittel der Informationsstrukturierung in Texten”. In Ebenen der Textstruktur. Sprachliche und kommunikative Prinzipien, ed. by Wolfgang Motsch, 211–240. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram
1998 “Cohesion and Coherence.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef 
Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
1988 “Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-theoretic Semantics.” In Mental Representations. The Interface Between Language and Reality, ed. by Ruth Kempson, 155–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duden
2009Die Grammatik. Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch. Herausgegeben von der Dudenredaktion. 8. Aufl. Mannheim & Zürich: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2012a “Textual Coherence as a Pragmatic Phenomenon.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 447–467. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b “Contexts in Interaction. Relating Pragmatic Wastebaskets.” In What is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer, and Petra Schumacher, 106–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary C. O’Connor
1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions. The Case of ‘Let Alone’”. Language 64 (3): 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finegan, Edward
1995 “Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: An Introduction.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation. Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Dieter Stein and Susan Wright, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita, and Jörg Meibauer
2014 “ ‘Festschrift oder nicht Festschrift.’ Zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik einer peripheren Konstruktion.” In Zwischen Kern und Peripherie: Untersuchungen zu Randbereichen in Sprache und Grammatik. Festschrift zum 64. Geburtstag von Norbert Fries, ed. by Antonio Machicao y Priemer, Andreas Nolda and Athina Sioupi, 69–88. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita
2012a “Evaluative meaning. Sentential patterns, context, and the category of cause.” Pragmatics & Cognition 20 (1): 107–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b “ ‘Naja, normal und normal.’ Zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der x-und-x-Konstruktion im Deutschen”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 31 (1): 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang
1982Phraseologie der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2006Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. 
Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. III, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
2009 “ ‘Adjektiv + dass-Satz’-Konstruktionen als kommunikative Ressourcen der Positionierung.” In Grammatik im Gespräch. Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung, ed. by Susanne Günthner and Jörg Bücker, 149–184. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, and Ekkehard König
1998 “Concessive Conditionals in the Languages of Europe.” In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Johan van der Auwera, 563–640. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Ludger
2002 “Zur Grammatik der kommunikativen Gewichtung im Deutschen”. In Grammatik und Grammatikvermittlung, ed. by Corinna Peschel, 9–37. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon, and Cheryl Zoll
2005Reduplication. Doubling in Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israeli, Alina
1997 “Syntactic Reduplication in Russian: A Cooperative Principle Device in Dialogues”. Journal of Pragmatics 271: 587–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacquemet, Marco
2001 “Conflict”. In Key Terms in Language and culture, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 37–39. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2006 “Stance Taking in Conversation: From Subjectivity to Intersubjectivity.” Text and Talk 26 (6): 699–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2010 “Social Action of Syntactic Reduplication.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 800–824. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kobele, Gregory
2008 “Argument! Another Look at the X or no X Construction.” [[URL]]. Last accessed May 10th, 2012.
König, Ekkehard
1986 “Conditionals, Concessive Conditionals and Concessives”. In On Conditionals, ed. by Elisabeth C. Taugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy S. Reilly, and Charles A. 
Ferguson, 229–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lang, Ewald
1984The Semantics of Coordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leuschner, Torsten
2005 “ ‘Ob blond, ob braun, ich liebe alle Frau’n’. Irrelevanzkonditionale als grammatikalisierter Diskurs”. In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, ed. by Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans, and Sarah De Groodt, 279–307. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Hypotaxis as Building-Site. The Emergence and Grammaticalization of Concessive Conditionals in English, German and Dutch. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Manaster-Ramer, Alexis
1986 “Copying in Natural Languages, Context-freeness, and Queue Grammars.” In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 85–89. New York: Columbia University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg
2008 “Tautology as Presumptive Meaning”. Pragmatics & Cognition 16 (3): 439–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A
1978 “Reduplicative Constructions”. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 3: Word Structure, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 297–334. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Perrin, Laurent, Denise Deshaies, and Claude Paradis
2003 “Pragmatic Functions of Local Diaphonic Repetitions in Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 351, 1843–1860. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, John
1986 “Thought Without Representation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume LX1: 263–283.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey, and Kyle Rawlins
2007 “Argument or No Argument?Linguistics and Philosophy 301: 277–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
2010Truth-conditional Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossdeutscher, Antje
2009 “German her, hin, hin- und her, and herum. Meaning and Justification of Direction and Change of Direction in Perceptual Space.” In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13, ed. by Arndt Riester and Torgrim Solstad, 439–454. Stuttgart: Online Publikationsverbund Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1989Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoffrey, and Susan Hunston
2000 “Evaluation. An Introduction.” In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoffrey Thompson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1987 “Boys Will Be Boys. ‘Radical Semantics’ vs. ‘Radical Pragmatics’”. Language 631: 95–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar
1987 “Satztypen, Satzarten, Satzmodi – Was Konditionale (auch) mit Interrogativen zu tun haben”. In Satzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, ed. by Jörg Meibauer, 259–285. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela, Ludger Hoffmann, and Bruno Strecker
1997Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Vol. 31. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2013“From N to N: The Anatomy of a Construction.” Linguistics and Philosophy 361: 65–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Ariel, Mira
2019. Orconstructions. Constructions and Frames 11:2  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Finkbeiner, Rita
2017. “ArgumenteHin, ArgumenteHer.” Regularity and Idiomaticity in GermanN Hin,N Her. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 29:3  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Johann, Michael & Lars Bülow
2018. Die Verbreitung von Internet-Memes. kommunikation at gesellschaft 19:2 DOI logo
Masini, Francesca & Simone Mattiola
2022. Syntactic discontinuous reduplication with antonymic pairs: a case study from Italian. Linguistics 60:1  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Mattiola, Simone & Francesca Masini
2022. Discontinuous reduplication: a typological sketch. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:2  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Onufrieva, E. S.
2020. Modern Greek Constructional Phrasemes with Antonymous Verbs: Χ τον ανε- βάζει, Χ / Y τον κατεβάζει and Χ μπαίνει, Χ βγαίνει. Nauchnyi dialog 1:10  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.