Cover not available
Article published In:
Circulating Signs and People: Politics, affect, ethnography
Edited by Daniel N. Silva
[Pragmatics and Society 6:2] 2015
► pp. 240–260

Beyond neurological structures

Signs of Alzheimer’s disease and other possible cartographies

| Federal University of São Paulo
Although clinical criteria ultimately determine the pathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, ‘Alzheimer’s’ is also an ordinary sign, falling within a range of other possible signs, values and beliefs that define and are used to interpret dementia and mental diseases. While looking at talk-in-interaction in which two people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s interact with other people, this article tries to show that the way in which both lay and professional people interpret Alzheimer’s signs allows us to shed some light upon the core of the traditional and controversial dichotomy between normal and pathological. The interactions analyzed in this paper show how people oppose biomedical discourse, suggesting that other forms of interpreting aging and forgetfulness are possible. It has opened multiple cartographies or varied spheres of communicability influenced by the signs of Alzheimer’s.
Keywords: signs, biocommunicabilities, Alzheimer’s disease, social interaction, bioidentity, discourse of risk, conversation analysis, DALI Corpus
Published online: 24 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.2.05cru
References (69)
Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, trans. by B. Brewster, 127–186. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, Molly. 1999. “The Seductiveness of Agelessness.” Ageing and Society 19 (3): 301–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Ageful and Proud.” Ageing and Society 20 (6): 791–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles, Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, and Mark Rapley. 2000. “‘Brilliant. Next Question....’: High-Grade Assessment Sequences in the Completion of Interactional Units.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 331: 235–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, John M., and John Heritage. 1984. Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Avery, Clare, and Charles Antaki. 1997. “Conversational Devices in Stories Turning on Appearance versus Reality.” Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 171: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ballenger, Jesse F. 2006. “The Biomedical Deconstruction of Senility and the Persistent Stigmatization of Old Age in the United States.” In Thinking about Dementia: Culture, Loss, and the Anthropology of Senility, ed. by Annette Leibing and Lawrence Cohen, 106–122. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beach, Thomas G. 1987. “The History of Alzheimer’s Disease: Three Debates.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 42 (3): 327–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berrios, German. 1989. “Non-cognitive Symptoms and the Diagnosis of Dementia. Historical and Clinical Aspects”. British Journal of Psychiatry 1541: 11–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. “Alzheimer’s Disease: A Conceptual History.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 51: 355–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berrios, German E., Ivana S. Marková, and Nestor Girala. 2000. “Functional Memory Complaints.” In Memory Disorders in Psychiatric Practice, ed. by German E. Berrios and John R. Hodges, 3–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles L. 2005. “Communicability, Racial Discourse, and Disease.” Annual Review of Anthropology 341: 269–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Anthropology, Interviewing, and Communicability in Contemporary Society.” Current Anthropology 48 (4): 551–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011a. “On Virtual Epidemics and the Mediatization of Public Health.” Language and Communication 311: 217–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. “Communicating Biosecurity.” Medical Anthropology 30 (1): 6–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles L., and Daniel Hallin. 2007. “Biocommunicability: The Neoliberal Subject and its Contradictions in News Coverage of Health Issues.” Social Text 25 (4): 43–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bytheway, Bill. 2000. “Youthfulness and Agelessness: A Comment.” Ageing and Society 20 (6): 781–789. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Ageism and Age Categorization.” Journal of Social Issues 61 (2): 361–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castiel, David L. 1999. A Medida do Possível: Saúde, Risco e Tecnobiociências. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Justine, and Nikolas Coupland. 1994. “Old Age Doesn’t Come Alone: Discursive Representations of Health-in-Aging.” International Journal of Aging & Human Development 39 (1): 81–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, Justine Coupland, and Howard Giles. 1991. Language, Society and the Elderly. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cruz, Fernanda M. 2008. Doença de Alzheimer, Linguagem e Interação. Ph.D. dissertation. Campinas, SP: Campinas State University.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage (eds). 1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duchan, Judith Felson, and Danna Kovarsky (eds). 2005. Diagnosis as Cultural Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folstein, Marshal F., Susan E. Folstein, and Paul Mchugh. 1975. “Mini Mental State. A Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician.” Journal of Psychiatric Research 121: 189–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1954. Maladie Mentale et Psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
. 1984a. Histoire de la Sexualité: l’Usage des Plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
. 1984b. Histoire de la Sexualité: le Souci de Soi. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Janice E. 2006. “Diagnosing Dementia and Clinical Data as Cultural Text.” In Thinking about Dementia: Culture, Loss, and the Anthropology of Senility, ed. by Annette Leibing and Lawrence Cohen, 80–105. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Janice E., Kenneth Rockwood, B. Lynn Beattie, Robin Eastwood, Serge Gauthier, 
Holly Tuokko, and Ian McDowell. 1997. “Prevalence and Severity of Cognitive Impairment with and without Dementia in Elderly Population.” The Lancet 3491: 1793–1796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Janice E., Arnold B. Mitnitski, Alexander J. Mogilner, and Kenneth Rockwood. 1999. “The Dynamics of Cognitive Aging: Distinguishing Functional Age and Disease from Chronological Age in a Population.” American Journal of Epidemiology 150 (10): 1045–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gubrium, Jaber F. 1986. Old-timers and Alzheimer’s: The Descriptive Organization of Senility. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1989. “Text and Textuality.” Annual Review of Anthropology 181: 95–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian. 1992. “The Delivery and Reception of Diagnosis in the General Practice Consultation.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 235–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helman, Cecil G. 2005. “Cultural Aspects of Time and Ageing: Time is not the Same in Every Culture and Every Circumstance; Our Views of Ageing also Differ.” European Molecular Biology Organization Special Issue 61: 54–58.Google Scholar
Holstein, Martha. 1997. “Alzheimer’s Disease and Senile Dementia, 1885–1920: An Interpretive History of Disease Negotiation.” Journal of Aging Studies 111: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke. 1996. “Probing Behavior in Semi-standardized Survey Interviews.” Quality and Quantity 301: 205–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leibing, Annette. 2001. “O Homem Sozinho numa Estação: a Doença de Alzheimer e as Práticas do Esquecimento no Brasil.” In Devorando o Tempo: Brasil, um País sem Memória, ed. by Annette Leibing and Sibylee Benninghoff Luhl, 77–89. São Paulo: Mandarim.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Divided Gazes: Alzheimer’s Disease, the Person within, and Death in Life.” In Thinking about Dementia: Culture, Loss, and the Anthropology of Senility, ed. by Annette Leibing and Lawrence Cohen, 240–268. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leibing, Annette, and Lawrence Cohen (eds). 2006. Thinking about Dementia: Culture, Loss, and the Anthropology of Senility. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lock, Margareth, Janalyn Prest, and Stephanie Lloyd. 2006. “Genetic Susceptibility and Alzheimer’s Disease: The Penetrance and Uptake of Genetic Knowledge.” In Thinking about Dementia: Culture, Loss, and the Anthropology of Senility, ed. by Annette Leibing and 
Lawrence Cohen, 123–156. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marlaire, Courtney L., and Douglas W. Maynard. 1990. “Standardized Testing as an Interactional Phenomenon.” Sociology of Education 631: 83–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas, and Courtney L. Marlaire. 1992. “Good Reasons for Bad Testing Performance: The Interactional Substrate of Educational Testing.” Qualitative Sociology 151: 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. 1992. “On Clinicians Co-implicating Recipients in the Delivery of Diagnostic News.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 331–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2005. “L’Analyse de Corpus dans la Perspective de la Linguistique Interactionnelle: des Analyses de Cas Singuliers aux Analyses de Collections.” In Sémantique et Corpus, ed. by Anne Condamine, 76–108. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar
Ortega, Francisco. 2009. “The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity.” BioSocieties 41: 425–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paoletti, Isabella. 1998. Being an Older Woman: A Study in the Social Production of Identity. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi. 1998 “Authority and Accountability: The Delivery of Diagnosis in Primary Health Care.” Social Psychology Quarterly 611: 301–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 2003. Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 2003. “Neurochemical Selves.” Society 41 (1): 46–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-­First Century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Materials for Doing Sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 31–74. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Vols. 1 & 21. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Nora Cate, and Douglas W. Maynard. 2005. “From Paradigm to Prototype and Back Again: Interactive Aspects of Cognitive Processing in Standardized Survey Interviews.” In Conversation and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig te Molder and Jonathan Potter, 114–133. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1972. “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 75–119. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Conversation Analysis and ‘Communication Disorders’.” In Conversation and Brain Damage, ed. by Charles Goodwin, 21–55. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Joseph P. 1993. No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Autism Movement Seeks Acceptance, Not Cures.” June 26. [URL]
Shenk, Denna. 2005. “There was an Old Woman: Maintenance of Identity by People with Alzheimer’s Dementia.” In Alzheimer Talk, Text and Context: Enhancing Communication, ed. by Davis H. Boyd, 3–17. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, André, and B. Lynn Beattie. 2001. “Disclosing a Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Patients and Families’ Experiences.” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 28 (1): 567–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swartz, R.H., S.E. Black, and P. St. George-Hyslop. 1999. “Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Genetic, Molecular and Neuroimaging Review.” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 261: 77–88.Google Scholar
Ten Have, Paul. 1999. Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Lay Diagnosis in Interaction.” Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 2 (2): 251–260.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Feriani, Daniela & Fernanda Miranda da Cruz
2022. Entre ilhas fabulosas: etnografia, autismo e demência em relação. Horizontes Antropológicos 28:64 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
CRUZ, Fernanda Miranda da
2017. INTERAÇÃO CORPORIFICADA: MULTIMODALIDADE, CORPO E COGNIÇÃO EXPLORADOS NA ANÁLISE DE CONVERSAS ENVOLVENDO SUJEITOS COM ALZHEIMER. Alfa : Revista de Linguística (São José do Rio Preto) 61:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.