Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 6:3 (2015) ► pp.367397
References (54)
Barnes, Douglas. 2008. “Exploratory Talk for Learning.” InExploring talk in schools. Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes, ed. byNeil Mercer and Steve Hodgkinson, 1–15. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Anne-Marie, Richard C. Anderson, Li-Jen Kuo, Il-Hee Kim, Anthi Archodidou, and Kim Nguyen-Jahiel. 2003. “Collaborative Reasoning: Expanding Ways for Children to Talk and Think in School.” Educational Psychology Review15 (2): 181–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, David K., and Miriam W. Smith. 1994. “Long-term Effects of Preschool Teachers’ Book Readings on Low-income Children’s Vocabulary and Story Comprehension.” Reading Research Quarterly29 (2): 105–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elbers, Ed, and Leen Streefland. 2000. “Collaborative Learning and the Construction of Common Knowledge.” European Journal of Psychology of Education15 (4): 479–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fassnacht, Chris, and David K. Woods. 2004. Transana [computer software]. Available from [URL].
Furberg, Anniken, and Hans C. Arnseth. 2009. “Reconsidering Conceptual Change from a Socio-cultural Perspective: Analyzing Students’ Meaning making in Genetics in Collaborative Learning Activities.” Cultural Studies of Science Education41: 157–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 2004. “Participation.” InA companion to linguistic anthropology, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, 222–244. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Gosen, Myrte N., Jan Berenst, and Kees de Glopper. 2009. “Participeren tijdens het voorlezen van prentenboeken in de kleuterklas. Een pilot-study.” Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen82 (1): 53–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “The Interactional Structure of Explanations during Shared Reading at Kindergarten.” International Journal of Educational Research621: 62–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greene Brabham, Edna, and Carol Lynch-Brown. 2002. “Effects of Teachers’ Reading-aloud Styles on Vocabulary Acquisition and Comprehension of Students in the Early Elementary Grades.” Journal of Educational Psychology94 (3): 465–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, Kris D., Patricia Baquedano-López, and Carlos Tejada. 1999. “Rethinking Diversity: Hybridity and Hybrid Language Practices in the Third Space.” Mind, Culture, and Activity6 (4): 286–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt. 1998. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “Transcript Notation.” InStructures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJohn M. Atkinson and John Heritage, ix–xvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. “Notes on ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset.” Human Studies91: 153–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Göran, Jonas Ivarsson, and Berner Lindström. 2013. “Agreed Discoveries: Students’ Negotiations in a Virtual Laboratory Experiment.” Instructional Science41 (3): 455–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koole, Tom. 2010. “Displays of Epistemic Access. Student Responses to Teacher Explanations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction43 (2): 183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koschmann, Timothy, and Curtis LeBaron. 2002. “Learner Articulation as Interactional Achievement: Studying the Conversation of Gesture.” Cognition and Instruction20 (2): 249–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Yo-An. 2007. “Third Turn Position in Teacher Talk: Contingency and the Work of Teaching.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (6): 1204–1230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macbeth, Douglas. 2003. “Hugh Mehan’s “Learning Lessons” Reconsidered: On the Differences between the Naturalistic and Critical Analysis of Classroom Discourse.” American Educational Research Journal40 (1): 239–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “The Relevance of Repair for Classroom Correction.” Language in Society331: 703–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Understanding Understanding as an Instructional Matter.” Journal of Pragmatics43 (2): 438–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margutti, Piera. 2006. “Are You Human Beings? Order and Knowledge Construction through Questioning in Primary Classroom Interaction.” Linguistics and Education17 (4): 313–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “On Designedly Incomplete Utterances: What Counts as Learning for Teachers and Students in Primary Classroom Interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction43 (4): 315–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McHoul, Alec. 1978. “The Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom.” Language in Society7 (2): 183–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1979a. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge/
London: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979b. ““What Time is it, Denise?”: Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse.” Theory into Practice18 (4): 285–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “The Study of Social Interaction in Educational Settings: Accomplishments and Unresolved Issues.” Human Development41 (4): 245–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Neil. 1995. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mercer, Neil, and Karen Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking. A Sociocultural Approach. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mol, Suzanne E., Adriana G. Bus, Marta T. de Jong, and Daisy J.H. Smeets. 2008. “Added Value of Dialogic Parent-child Book Readings: A Meta-analysis.” Early Education & Development19 (1): 7–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, Hossein, and Gordon Wells. 2000. “What’s the Use of ‘Triadic Dialogue?: An Investigation of Teacher-Student Interaction.” Applied Linguistics21 (3): 376–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolopoulou, Ageliki, and Michael Cole. 1993. “Generation and Transmission of Shared Knowledge in the Culture of Collaborative Learning: The Fifth Dimension, its Play-World, and its Institutional Contexts.” InContexts for Learning: Sociocultural Dynamics in Children’s Development, ed. byEllice A. Forman, Norris Minick, and C. Addison Stone, 283–313. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nystrand, Martin, and Adam Gamoran. 1991. “Student Engagement: When Recitation becomes Conversation.” In Effective Teaching: Current Research, ed. byHersholt C. Waxman and Herbert J. Walberg, 257–276. Berkeley, Calif.: McCurchan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Pantaleo, Sylvia. 2007. “Interthinking: Young Children Using Language to Think Collectively during Interactive Read-alouds.” Early Childhood Education Journal34 (6): 439–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reese, Elaine, and Adell Cox. 1999. “Quality of Adult Book Reading Affects Children’s Emergent Literacy.” Developmental Psychology35 (1): 20–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reese, Elaine, Adell Cox, Diana Harte, and Helena McAnally. 2003. “Diversity in Adults’ Styles of Reading Books to Children.” InOn Reading Books to Children: Parents and Teachers, ed. byAnne van Kleeck, Steven A. Stahl, and Eurydice B. Bauer, 37–57. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rogoff, Barbara. 1990. Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McHardy, and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sterponi, Laura. 2007. “Clandestine Interactional Reading: Intertextuality and Double-voicing under the Desk.” Linguistics and Education18 (1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szymanski, Margaret H. 2003. “Producing Text through Talk: Question-answering Activity in Classroom Peer Groups.” Linguistics and Education13 (4): 533–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabak, Iris, and Eric Baumgartner. 2004. “The Teacher as Partner: Exploring Participant Structures, Symmetry, and Identity Work in Scaffolding.” Cognition and Instruction22 (4): 393–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ten Have, Paul. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. 
Cambridge, Mass./London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Gordon. 1993. “Reevaluating the IRF Sequence: A Proposal for the Articulation of Theories of Activity and Discourse for the Analysis of Teaching and Learning in the Classroom.” Linguistics and Education5 (1): 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
What Works Clearinghouse. 2007. WWC Intervention Report: Dialogic Reading. U.S. Department of Education: Institute of Education Sciences.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Angela. 2011. “Interactive Read Alouds: Teachers and Students Constructing Knowledge and Literacy Together.” Early Childhood Education Journal381: 431–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, David, Jerome S. Bruner, and Gail Ross. 1976. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry171: 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grindley, Sally, and Peter Utton. 2001. Sssst! Amsterdam: Altamira Jeugd/Uitgeverij Sjaloom. (Dutch translation of Grindley, Sally and Peter Utton. 1999. Shhh! London: Hodder Children’s Books.)Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Eldstål-Ahrens, Lea, Malin Nilsen & Niklas Pramling
2024. Microgenetic development of a primary school child’s argumentative participation in a small-group discussion. Classroom Discourse 15:3  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
van Balen, Johanna, Myrte N. Gosen, Siebrich de Vries & Tom Koole
2024. Peer-to-peer-talk in whole-classroom discussions. International Journal of Educational Research 125  pp. 102354 ff. DOI logo
van der Meij, Sofie, Myrte Gosen & Annerose Willemsen
2024. ‘Yes? I have no idea’: teacher turns containing epistemic disclaimers in upper primary school whole-class discussions. Classroom Discourse 15:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pulles, Maaike, Jan Berenst, Tom Koole & Kees de Glopper
2021. Text formulations as practices of demonstrating understanding in dialogic reading. Text & Talk 41:4  pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Pulles, Maaike, Jan Berenst, Tom Koole & Kees De Glopper
2021. How primary school children address reading problems in dialogic reading. Research on Children and Social Interaction 4:2 DOI logo
Takahashi, Junko
2021. Answering vs. exploring: Contrastive responding styles of East-Asian students and native-English-speaking students in the American graduate classroom. Linguistics and Education 64  pp. 100958 ff. DOI logo
Willemsen, Annerose, Myrte Gosen, Tom Koole & Kees De Glopper
2021. Asking for more. Research on Children and Social Interaction 4:2 DOI logo
Willemsen, Annerose, Myrte N. Gosen, Marije van Braak, Tom Koole & Kees de Glopper
2018. Teachers’ open invitations in whole-class discussions. Linguistics and Education 45  pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Hellermann, John & Teppo Jakonen
2015. Interactional Approaches to the Study of Classroom Discourse and Student Learning. In Research Methods in Language and Education,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hellermann, John & Teppo Jakonen
2017. Interactional Approaches to the Study of Classroom Discourse and Student Learning. In Research Methods in Language and Education,  pp. 449 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.