Article published In:
Pragmatics and SocietyVol. 6:4 (2015) ► pp.517–537
A socio-pragmatic investigation of the persuasive strategies in "al-ittijāh al-muʿākis" (‘The Opposite Direction’) on Al-Jazeera TV
This study is a socio-pragmatic analysis of persuasive strategies used by the participants in “al-ittijāh al-muʿākis”, “The Opposite Direction”, on the Al-Jazeera TV channel. An ethnographic approach was adopted in the research; the analysis focused on the use of politeness strategies and face-saving and face-threatening interactions in order to find out their persuasive factors. I observe that religious citations, prophetic sayings, proverbs, and metaphor are used predominantly by the participants in communicating various political issues. I argue that the persuasiveness of these rhetorical strategies stems from their aesthetic influence in establishing moral credibility and in evoking emotional responses. I also argue that these rhetorical strategies are speech acts that indirectly provoke responses and/or aim at saving the speakers’ and/or addressees’ face. The study concludes that persuasiveness is facilitated in part by transferring socio-pragmatic meanings through the use of some politeness and figurative devices such as honorific modes, metaphors and proverbs.
References
Abdulati, Hammudah
1975 Islam in Focus. Indianapolis, Ind.: American Trust Publications.
Al-Khatib, Mahmoud
1994 “A Sociolinguistic View of the Language of Persuasion in Jordanian Society.” L
anguage
, Culture, and Curriculum7 (2): 161–174. 
Aristotle
Rhetoric. Trans. byRhys Roberts. Book II, Part I.
Austin, John
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Benjamin, James
1997.Principles, Elements, and Types of Persuasion. Philadelphia: Harcourt. Brace & Co.
Blom, Jan-Petter, and John Gumperz
1972 “Social Meaning in Linguistic Structures: Code Switching in Northern Norway.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. byJohn Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, 407–434. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Brown, Roger
1978 Words and Things: An Introduction to Language. New York: Free Press.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caballero, Rosario
2003 “Metaphor and Genre: The Presence and Role of Metaphor in Building a Review.” Applied Linguistics24 (2): 145–167.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
1995 “Proverbs in Communication.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development16 (4): 259–268.
2011 Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gilbert, Michael
1997 Coalescent Argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goffman, Erving
1967 Interaction Ritual. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Hymes, Dell
1964 Language in Culture and Society. New York: Harper & Row.
Ide, Sachiko
1972 “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life. In:Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. byJohn Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication8 (2–3): 223–248.
Issa, Sadam, and Ghazi Abuhakema
2012 “Rhetorical Properties and Generic Structure Analysis of Christian and Muslim Obituaries: The Case of the Egyptian Daily Newspaper Al-Ahram.” Al-’Arabiyya44–45: 65–86.
Lakoff, George
1990 Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf. Berkeley, Calif.: The Author.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach
1982 “Persuasive Discourse and Ordinary Conversation, with Examples from Advertising.” InAnalyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, ed. byDeborah Tannen, 25–42. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Lin, Huey Hannah
2005 Contextualizing Linguistic Politeness in Chinese – A Socio-Pragmatic Approach with Examples from Persuasive Sales Talk in Taiwan Mandarin. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University.
Maingueneau, Dominique
1991 L’analyse du discours, introduction aux lectures de l’archive. Paris: Hachette.
Manolescu, Beth Innocenti
2006 “A Normative Pragmatic Perspective on Appealing to Emotions in Argumentation.” Argumentation201: 327–343.
May, James M
2002 “Ciceronian Oratory in Context.” InBrill’s Companion to Cicero, Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. byJames M. May, 49–70. Leiden: Brill.
Miller, Gerald
1989 “Persuasion and Public Relations: Two ‘ps’ in a Pod.” InPublic Relations Theory, ed. byCarl H. Botan, and Vincent Hazleton, 45–66. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Mio, Jeffery Scott
1997 Metaphor and Politics. Metaphor and Symbol12 (2): 113–133.
Obeng, Samuel Gyasi
1997 “Communication Strategies: Persuasion and Politeness in Akan Judicial Discourse.” Text17 (1): 25–51.
Paulhan, Jean
1938 Les Hain-Tenys. Paris: Gallimard.
Richards, I.A
1936 The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
1979 Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, Douglas
1992 The Place of Emotion in Argument. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Weigand, Edda
1998 “Emotions in Dialogue.” Dialogue Analysis6 (1): 36–47.
Wolfson, Nessa
1983 “An Empirically Based Analysis of Complimenting in American English.” InSociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, ed. byNessa Wolfson and Elliot Judd, 82–95. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.