This study examines rituals of outspokenness, by analysing cases drawn from the US hidden camera show, Primetime: What Would You Do? Studying ritualistic behaviour in cases when bystanders become side participants as they stand up for victims of abuse fills a knowledge gap in pragmatics. A further merit of studying this phenomenon is that it provides insight into the reactive aspect of ritual behaviour, which is usually described in the field as a form of action rather than reaction. Furthermore, examining the morally loaded acts of rituals of outspokenness reveals the potentially complex relationship between aggression and normative behaviour.
1997Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot
2000 “The Reality of Moral Expectations: A Sociology of Situated Judgement.” Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action 3 (3): 208–231.
2009 “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The “Culture Wars”.” Journal of Politeness Research 51: 273–303.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2010 “A Genre Approach to the Study of Im-politenes.” International Review of Pragmatics 2 (1): 46–94.
Goffman, Erving
1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.
Goffman, Erving
1979 “Footing.” Semiotica 25 (1/2): 1–30.
Gorsuch, Richard L., and John Ortberg
1983 “Moral Obligation and Attitudes: Their Relation to Behavioural Intentions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (5): 1025–1028.
Graham, Sage Lambert
2007 “Disagreeing to Agree: (Im)politeness and Identity in a Computer-mediated Community.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 742–59.
Haugh, Michael
2010 “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)alignment, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2106–2119.
Haugh, Michael, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2014Politeness in China and Japan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hayashi, Takuo
1996 “Politeness in Conflict Management: A Conversation Analysis of Dispreferred Message from a Cognitive Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 251: 227–255.
Heritage, John, and Anna Lindström
2012 “Knowledge, Empathy and Emotion in a Medical Encounter.” In Emotion and Affect in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 256–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heyd, Theresa
2010 “How you Guys Doin’? Staged Orality and Emerging Plural Address in the Television Series Friends.” American Speech 85 (1): 33–66.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
(eds)2013Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lüger, Heinz-Helmut
1983 “Some Aspects of Ritual Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 7 (6): 695–711.
Makri-Tsilipakou, Marianthi
2004 “Interruption Revisited: Affiliative vs. Disaffilitative Intervention.” Journal of Pragmatics 21 (4): 401–426.
Manning, Rachel, Mark Levine, and Alan Collins
2007 “The Kitty Genovese Murder and the Social Psychology of Helping: The Parable of the 38 Witnesses.” American Psychologist 62 (6): 555–562.
Marques, J.M
1990 “The Black-sheep Effect: Out-group Homogeneity in Social Comparison Settings.” In Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, ed. by D. Abrahams, and M.A. Hogg, 131–151. New York: Springer.
Marques, J.M., and D. Paez
1994 “The “Black-sheep Effect”: Social Categorization, Rejection of In-group Deviates and Perception of Group Variability.” European Review of Social Psychology 51: 37–68.
Mey, Jacob L
2008“Impeach or Exorcise? Or, What is in the (Common) Ground?” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by István Kecskés and Jacob Mey, 255–276. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pan, Yuling
2013Interactional Sociolinguistics as a Research Perspective. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. London: Blackwell.
Rampton, Ben
2009 “Interaction Ritual and not Just Artful Performance in Crossing and Stylization.” Language in Society 38 (2): 149–176.
Sommer, Kristin, and Juran Yoon
2013 “When Silence is Golden: Ostracism as a Resource Conservation during Aversive Interactions.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30 (7): 901–919.
Stivers, Tanya, Loranza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
(eds)2011The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Takahashi, Tomoko, and Leslie Beebe
1987 “Development of Pragmatic Competence by Japanese Learners of English.” The JALT Journal 8 (2): 131–156.
Van Dijk, Teun A
1997“The Study of Discourse. In Discourse as Structure and Process, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 1–34. London: Sage.
Whutnow, Robert
1989Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Williams, K.D., and K.L. Sommer
1997 “Social Ostracism by One’s Coworkers: Does Rejection Lead to Loafing or Compensation?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 231: 693–706.
Williams, K.D., and L. Zadro
2001 “Ostracism: On being Ignored, Excluded, and Rejected.” In Interpersonal Rejection, ed. by M.R. Leary, 21–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wynn, Rolf, and Michael Wynn
2006 “Empathy as an Interactionally Achieved Phenomenon in Psychotherapy: Characteristics of some Conversational Resources.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (9): 1385–1397.
Cited by
Cited by 10 other publications
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics,
Izadi, Ahmad
2023. On the moral grounds of professional argumentative talk: English-mediated talk in Iranian PhD dissertation defences. Discourse Studies 25:3 ► pp. 342 ff.
Joyce, Jack B. & J. Sterphone
2022. Challenging racism in public spaces: Practices for interventions into disputes. Journal of Pragmatics 201 ► pp. 43 ff.
Ke, Yuguo
2023. Integrated positive and negative analyses of cognitive-mediation strategies in the social quarrels. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1
2020. Mock Impoliteness and Co-Construction of Hudui Rituals in Chinese Online Interaction. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 43:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.