The role of metapragmatic expressions as pragmatic manipulation in a TV panel discussion program
Ping Liu | Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China
Yongping Ran | Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China
This study explores the role of metapragmatic expressions (MPEs) as pragmatic manipulation in a media context, with data drawn from a Chinese TV panel discussion program Tiger Talk. It argues that the program host selects MPEs to manipulate the ongoing interactions, in order to solve or prevent the actual or potential problems in the interactions. Hence, the functioning of MPEs is described as a process consisting of three stages: problem awareness, pragmatic manipulation, and problem resolution or prevention. It is found that the host mainly uses five types of MPEs, i.e. performatives, commentaries, evidentials, message glosses, and stance displayers for the sake of pragmatic manipulation across the three dimensions of interactive procedure control, rapport management, and impact monitoring. The article concludes that the host’s pragmatic manipulation of the ongoing interactions, driven by both institutional and interpersonal concerns, is motivated by his institutional rights and obligations as a program manager.
2013 “The Metapragmatic Negation as a Rapport-Oriented Mitigating Device”. Journal of Pragmatics 481: 98–111.
Rigotti, Eddo
2005 “Towards a Typology of Manipulative Processes.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, language, mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure and Peter Schulz. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Silverstein, Michael
1993 “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John A. Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2019. The 4E Encounter. In Supercomplexity in Interaction, ► pp. 59 ff.
Schneider, Klaus P.
2022. Referring to Speech Acts in Communication: Exploring Meta-Illocutionary Expressions in ICE-Ireland. Corpus Pragmatics 6:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Zhang, Huiyu & Yicheng Wu
2019. (Core) common ground and the role of metapragmatic expressions: A comment on Liu and Liu (2017). Journal of Pragmatics 148 ► pp. 111 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.