Cover not available
Article published In:
(Co-)Constructing Interpersonally Sensitive Activities Across Institutional Settings
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Rosina Márquez Reiter
[Pragmatics and Society 7:4] 2016
► pp. 512–539

Requests and counters in Russian traffic police officer-citizen encounters

Face and identity implications

| University of Surrey
| Independent researcher
| Middlesex University

This paper analyses video recorded interactions between police officers and drivers in traffic stops in Russia. The interactions were recorded via cameras installed on the drivers’ car dashboards, and subsequently uploaded to YouTube; a practice to which over one million Russian motorists have resorted to counterbalance perceived high levels of bribery and corruption (Griaznova 2007). The analysis focuses on responses to opening requests for identification in five different encounters. These show that the drivers repeatedly engage in potentially interpersonally sensitive activities in which the vulnerability of face, especially that of the police officer, is interactionally manifested by launching counter requests in return. The organisation of the request–counter request sequences highlights how face and identity related concerns are interwoven in the participants’ attempts to contest each other’s authority.

Keywords: police-citizen encounters, counter requests, situational identities, transportable identities, face, discourse identities
Published online: 20 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.01mar
References
Al Jazeera
2012 Russian Car Cams Aim to Drive out Corruption. Accessed 2 September 2016. [URL]
Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe
(eds) 1998 Identities in Talk. London: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
Balmforth, Tom
2012 Cops, Cars, and Videotape: Russians Embrace Dash-Cam Craze. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Accessed 2 September 2016. [URL].Google Scholar
Bax, Ingrid
1986 “How to Assign Work in an Office: A Comparison of Spoken and Written Directives in American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 10 (6): 673–692. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BBC
2013 Meteor Highlights Rise of Dashboard Cameras in Russia. Accessed 2 September 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos
2013 “Introduction: Face, Identity and Im/politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary
1999 “ ‘Why Be Normal?’: Language and Identity Practices in a Community of Nerd Girls.” Language in Society 28 (2): 203–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheloukhine, Serguei, Sanja Kutnjak Ivković, Qasim Haq, and Maria R. Haberfeld
2015 “Police Integrity in Russia.” In Measuring Police Integrity Across the World, ed. by Sanja Kutnjak Ivković and Maria R. Haberfeld, 153–181. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chistyakova, Yulia, and Annette Robertson
2012 “YouTube Cops and Power without Limits: Understanding Police Violence in 21st Century Russia.” The Journal of Power Institutions in Post-Soviet Societies 131. Assessed 31 August 2016. [URL].Google Scholar
Church, Amelia
2012 Preference Organisation and Peer Disputes: How Young Children Resolve Conflict. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert, and Dale Schunk
1980 “Polite Responses to Polite Requests.” Cognition 8 (2): 111–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corsaro, William A., and Douglas W. Maynard
1996 “Format Tying in Discussion and Argumentation among Italian and American Children.” In Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language, ed. by Dan I. Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis, and Jiansheng Guo, 157–174. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 35–72.Google Scholar
2011 Impoliteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Ann Wichmann
2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10): 1545–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dastjerdi, Hossein Vahid, Mehdi Latifi, and Elham Mohammadi
2011 “Analysis of Power and Threat Manifestation in the Discourse of Traffic Police Officers: A CDA Perspective.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 2 (1): 255–260. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Judy
1984 “Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dorodnych, Anatoly
1995 “A Study of Requests in English, Russian and Ukrainian.” Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 301: 55–63.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
1997 “Open Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28 (1): 69–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Ann R., and Catherine Garvey
1981 “Children’s Use of Verbal Strategies in Resolving Conflicts.” Discourse Processes 4 (2): 149–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1976 “ ‘Is Sybil There?’ The Structure of Some American English Directives.” Language in Society 5 (1): 25–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and Power. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Farman, Jason
2012 Mobile Interface Theory: Embodied Space and Locative Media. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce, and William Nolen
1981 “The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 271: 93–110.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul
1972 “Social Context and Semantic Feature: The Russian Pronominal Usage.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Dell H. Hymes, 270–300. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Galperina, Marina
2012 Dash-cams: Russia’s Last Hope for Civility and Survival on the Road. Accessed August 31, 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1984 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
1961 Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Interaction. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2006 “Retrospective and Prospective Orientation in the Construction of Argumentative Moves.” Text & Talk. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 26 (4–5): 443–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H
2002 “Exclusion in Girls’ Peer Groups: Ethnographic Analysis of Language Practices on the Playground.” Human Development 451: 392–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin
1987 “Children’s Arguing.” In Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective, ed. by Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele, and Christine Tanz, 200–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griaznova, Olga S
2007 “Russian Residents’ Attitudes Toward the Law-Enforcement Agencies: A Review of Recent Research.” Russian Politics and Law 45 (3): 74–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gudkov, Lev
2000 “Otnoshenie k Pravovym Institutam v Rossii [The attitude toward legal institutions in Russia].” Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes 3 (47): 30–39.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J
1982 Discourse Strategies. Vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John. J
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Have, Paul ten
2007 Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haworth, Kate
2006 “The Dynamics of Power and Resistance in Police Interview Discourse.” Discourse & Society 117 (6): 739–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John J
1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine
2006 “ ‘Will You or Can’t You?’: Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (7): 1081–1104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
(eds) 1997 Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas
1992 “The Linguistic Realization of Face Management: Implications for Language Production and Comprehension, Person Perception, and Cross-cultural Communication.” Social Psychology Quarterly 5521: 141–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald
2009 “Membership Categorization, Culture and Norms in Action.” Discourse & Society 20 (3): 345–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, James R
1970 “Police-citizen Encounters that Lead to Citizen Complaints.” Social Problems 18 (2): 179–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt
1998 Conversational Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
1994 What Else Can I Tell You?: A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
(ed) 2009 Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jayyusi, Lena
1984 Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1978 “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 12–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel, and Rosina Márquez Reiter
2015 “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 239–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keisanen, Tiina, and Mirka Rauniomaa
2012 “The Organization of Participation and Contingency in Prebeginnings of Request Sequences.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (4): 323–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kent, Alexandra
2012 “Compliance, Resistance and Incipient Compliance When Responding to Directives.” Discourse Studies 14 (6): 711–730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Cathérine
2005 “Politeness in France: How to Buy Bread Politely.” In Politeness in Europe, ed. by Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart, 29–57. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
1997 “Varieties of Rudeness: Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances.” Functions of Language 4 (2): 251–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovalev, Vitaly V., Liliya V. Sazhina, and Natalia B. Ivanova
2014 “Ljubov’ k videoregistratoram v Rossii: sociokul’turnye osobennosti mentaliteta ili zashchita ot korrupcii dorozhnoj policii? [Love of Video Cameras In Russia: Socio-cultural Peculiarities of Mentality or Protection Against Corruption of Traffic Police?].” Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology 1 (17): 128–137.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 Activity Types and Language. Linguistics 17 (5–6): 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony J
2011 An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Limberg, Holger
2008 “Threats in Conflict Talk: Impoliteness and Manipulation.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 155–179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna
2005 “Language as Social Action. A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen and Margaret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A
2004 Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Relational work, politeness, and identity construction”. In APA Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, ed. by David Matsumoto, 112–138. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
2011 “Situated Impoliteness: The Interface Between Relational Work and Identity Construction.” In Situated Politeness, ed. by Bethan L. Davies, Michael Haugh, and Andrew John Merrison, 187–208. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
2008 “Real disorder in the court: An investigation of conflict talk in US television courtroom shows.” Media, Culture & Society 30 (1): 189–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “You’re barking mad, I’m out?: Impoliteness and broadcast talk.” Journal of Politeness Research, Language, Behaviour, Culture 5 (2): 159–187.Google Scholar
Markee, Numa
1995 “Teachers’ Answers to Students’ Questions: Problematizing the Issue of Making Meaning.” Issues in Applied Linguistics 6 (2): 63–92.Google Scholar
2004 “Zones of Interactional Transition in ESL Classes.” Modern Language Journal 88 (4): 583–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
2000 Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Mediated Business Interactions: Intercultural Communication Between Speakers of Spanish. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
1988 “Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 12 (4): 403–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKinlay, Andy, and Anne Dunnett
1998 “How Gun Owners Accomplish Being Deadly Average.” In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 34–51. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Merritt, Marilyn
1976 “On Questions Following Questions in Service Encounters.” Language in Society 5 (3): 315–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Daniel
(ed) 2001 Car Cultures. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara
2003 Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minchin, Elizabeth
2002 “Verbal Behaviour in its Social Context: Three Question Strategies in Homer’s Odyssey.” The Classical Quarterly (New Series) 52 (1): 15–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MVD Rossii
2013 Gosavtoinspekcija o videoregistratorah [The State Motor Vehicle Inspectorate on DVR cams]. Assessed August 31 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva
2009 Politeness and In-directness Across Cultures: A Comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian Requests. Journal of Politeness Research 5 (2): 189–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelmutter, Renee
2010 “Impoliteness Recycled: Subject Ellipsis in Modern Russian Complaint Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (12): 3214–3231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Shaming, group face, and identity construction in a Russian virtual community for women.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness, ed. by Marina Terkourafi, 149–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” In Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and Jenny Mandelbaum
2005 “Conversation Analytic Approaches to the Relevance and Uses of Relationship Categories in Interaction.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 149–171. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne Warfield
1987 “The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman’s Contribution to Social Theory.” Sociological Theory 5 (2): 136–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rønneberg, Kari, and Jan Svennevig
2010 “Declining to Help: Rejections in Service Requests to the Police.” Discourse & Communication 4 (3): 279–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossijskaja Gazeta
2009 “Prikaz Ministersva Vnutrennih Del Rossijskoj Federacii ot 2 Marta 2009 goda N 185” [Order of the Minister of Internal Affairs of Russia No 185 of March 2, 2009]. Rossijskaja gazeta. Federal’nyj vypusk 4946 (122). Assessed August 31, 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
2011 “Federal’nyj Zakon ot 7 Fevralja 2011 g. N 3-FZ ‘O Policii’” [Federal Law No. 3-FZ of February 7, 2011 ‘On the Police’]. Rossijskaja gazeta. Federal’nyj vypusk 5401 (25). Assessed October 19, 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1995 Lectures on Conversation. Volumes I & II1, ed. by Gail Jefferson (with an Introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff.) Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1991 “Reflections on Talk and Social Structure.” In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, ed. by Deirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, 44–70. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1992 “Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980 “Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ‘Can I Ask You a Question?’” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 104–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. Vol. 1: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R
1979 Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shon, Phillip C
1998 “Now You Got a Dead Baby on Your Hands’: Discursive Tyranny in ‘Cop Talk’.” Revue Internationale de Semiotique Juridique 11 (3): 275–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Bringing the Spoken Words Back: Conversationalizing (Postmodernizing) Police-Citizen Encounter Research.” Critical Criminology 11 (2): 151–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “ ‘I’d Grab the SOB by His Hair and Yank Him out the Window’: The Fraternal Order of Warnings and Threats in Police-Citizen Encounters.” Discourse & Society 16 (6): 829–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Language and Demeanor in Police-Citizen Encounters. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Silverman, David
1998 Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
(ed) 2000 Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013 “Relating at Work: Facets, Dialectics and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 121–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henry
1982 “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology 33 (1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen
2006 Request Sequences: The Intersection of Grammar, Interaction and Social Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TASS
2013 Fines for Traffic Violations Registered by Video Cameras on Roads in the Moscow Region Amounted to 800 Million Roubles Last Year. Accessed 1 September 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds) 2015 Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toepfl, Florian
2011 “Managing Public Outrage: Power, Scandal, and New Media in Contemporary Russia.” New Media & Society 13 (8): 1301–1319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen, and Donald L. Anderson
1999 “Relational Positioning Strategies in Police Calls: A Dilemma.” Discourse Studies 1 (2): 201–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Transparency International
2015 Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. Assessed September 2 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
Vinkhuyzen, Erik, and Margaret H. Szymanski
2005 “ ‘Would you Like to Do it Yourself?’ Service Requests and their Non-granting Responses.” In Applying Conversation Analysis, ed. by Keith Richards and Paul Seedhouse, 91–106. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wade, Terence L.B
1992 A Comprehensive Russian Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whalen, Marilyn R., and Don H. Zimmerman
1987 “Sequential and Institutional Contexts in Calls for Help.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2): 172–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1991 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoong, David
2010 “Interactional Norms in the Australian Police Interrogation Room.” Discourse & Society 21 (6): 693–713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H
1984 “Talk and Its Occasion: The Case of Calling the Police.” In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 210–228. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1992 “The Interactional Organization of Calls for Emergency Assistance.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1998 “Identity, Context and Interaction.” In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 87–106. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

de Castro Neto, Miguel, Marcel Nascimento, Pedro Sarmento, Sara Ribeiro, Teresa Rodrigues & Marco Painho
2019. A Dashboard for Security Forces Data Visualization and Storytelling. In Information Systems for Industry 4.0 [Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 31], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Mora-Rodriguez, Michael
2022. Resolving suspicion moment-by-moment. The overall structural organization of police encounters in the Spain-France border area. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Mora-Rodriguez, Michael & Carles Roca-Cuberes
2022. Everyday Practices in Dealing with Cross-Border Crime: Some Insights from Conversation Analysis. Social Sciences 12:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Márquez Reiter, Rosina & Adriana Patiño‐Santos
2021. The politics of conviviality: On‐the‐ground experiences from Spanish‐speaking Latin Americans in Elephant and Castle, London. Journal of Sociolinguistics 25:5 ► pp. 662 ff. DOI logo
Márquez-Reiter, Rosina & Michael Haugh
2019. Denunciation, blame and the moral turn in public life. Discourse, Context & Media 28 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
ÇETİNAVCI, Uğur Recep
2020. Naturally occurring requests in Turkish: A case from an academic context. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.