Article published in:
(Co-)Constructing Interpersonally Sensitive Activities Across Institutional Settings
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Rosina Márquez Reiter
[Pragmatics and Society 7:4] 2016
► pp. 570594
References

References

Atkinson, John, and Paul Drew
1979Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation)
2011Mexican Poll Contender Peña Nieto Falters at Book Event. 6 December 2011. [online] Accessed on 30 August 2016 from http://​www​.bbc​.com​/news​/world​-latin​-america​-16044216
Bull, Peter
1994 “On Identifying Questions, Replies, and Non-replies in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13 (2): 115–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Kate Mayer
1993 “How Not to Answer Questions in Political Interviews”. Political Psychology 14 (4): 651–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
1988 “Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews.” Social Problems 35 (4): 474–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Answers and Evasions.” Language and Society 30 (3): 403–442.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
2002The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clementson, David E.
2015 “Why Do We Think Politicians Are So Evasive? Insight From Theories of Equivocation and Deception, with a Content Analysis of U.S. Presidential Debates, 1996–2012.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35 (3): 247–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garibay Kintana, Ángel M.
1964La Literatura de los Aztecas. Mexico, DF: Joaquín Mortiz.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
1987 “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.” IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra
1991 “Evasive Action: How Politicians Respond to Questions in Political Interviews.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1990 “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–93. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
2004 “Glossary of Transcription Conventions.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 14–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paz, Octavio
1989 [1950]El Laberinto de la Soledad [The Labyrinth of Solitude]. Mexico, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Actions, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68: 939–967. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1987 “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R.E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
1992Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. A.
1996 “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-interaction: A Partial Sketch of Systematic.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organisation in Interaction: A Prime in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez Carranza, Ariel
2013 “Responding and Clarifying: An Analysis of pues as a Sequential Marker in Mexican Spanish Talk-in-interactions.” Spanish in Context 10 (2): 284–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Sequential Markers in Mexican Spanish Talk: A Conversation Analytic Study. PhD Thesis. University of Essex.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Janusz, Bernadetta, Jörg R. Bergmann, Feliks Matusiak & Anssi Peräkylä
2021. Practices of Claiming Control and Independence in Couple Therapy With Narcissism. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.