Article published In:
(Co-)Constructing Interpersonally Sensitive Activities Across Institutional Settings
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Rosina Márquez Reiter
[Pragmatics and Society 7:4] 2016
► pp. 570594
References
Atkinson, John, and Paul Drew
1979Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation)
2011Mexican Poll Contender Peña Nieto Falters at Book Event. 6 December 2011. [online] Accessed on 30 August 2016 from [URL]
Bull, Peter
1994 “On Identifying Questions, Replies, and Non-replies in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13 (2): 115–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Kate Mayer
1993 “How Not to Answer Questions in Political Interviews”. Political Psychology 14 (4): 651–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E
1988 “Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews.” Social Problems 35 (4): 474–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Answers and Evasions.” Language and Society 30 (3): 403–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
2002The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clementson, David E
2015 “Why Do We Think Politicians Are So Evasive? Insight From Theories of Equivocation and Deception, with a Content Analysis of U.S. Presidential Debates, 1996–2012.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35 (3): 247–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garibay Kintana, Ángel M
1964La Literatura de los Aztecas. Mexico, DF: Joaquín Mortiz.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
1987 “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.” IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra
1991 “Evasive Action: How Politicians Respond to Questions in Political Interviews.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1990 “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–93. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
2004 “Glossary of Transcription Conventions.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 14–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paz, Octavio
1989 [1950]El Laberinto de la Soledad [The Labyrinth of Solitude]. Mexico, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Actions, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 681: 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1987 “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R.E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
1992Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. A
1996 “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-interaction: A Partial Sketch of Systematic.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organisation in Interaction: A Prime in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez Carranza, Ariel
2014Sequential Markers in Mexican Spanish Talk: A Conversation Analytic Study. PhD Thesis. University of Essex.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2022. Assessments and actions: Instances from Arabic broadcast political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 191  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2023. ‘We are not putschists’: Accountability and the negotiation of membership categories in political news interviews. Discourse, Context & Media 56  pp. 100743 ff. DOI logo
Alroumi, Abdulrahman & El Mustapha Lahlali
2023. The role of assessments in providing evasive answers in news interviews. Pragmatics and Society 14:6  pp. 883 ff. DOI logo
Janusz, Bernadetta, Jörg R. Bergmann, Feliks Matusiak & Anssi Peräkylä
2021. Practices of Claiming Control and Independence in Couple Therapy With Narcissism. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Zainal Abidin, Najah, Veronica Lowe & Jariah Mohd Jan
2023. Evasion in Malaysian Parliamentary Question Time. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 31:3  pp. 1057 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.