Cover not available
Article published In:
(Co-)Constructing Interpersonally Sensitive Activities Across Institutional Settings
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Rosina Márquez Reiter
[Pragmatics and Society 7:4] 2016
► pp. 638–663

When routine calls for information become interpersonally sensitive

| University of Maribor
| University of Surrey
This paper examines interpersonally sensitive exchanges in two calls for information to the call centre of a public transport company. In order to provide relevant information and facilitate sequence progressivity, the agents need to go through specific steps. Although this is typical of institutional settings, customers may not necessarily be aware of them. The excerpts examined in this paper show how the customers’ lack of knowledge of the institutional steps the agents have to go through to attend to their requests and customers’ claims to product knowledge, coupled with the agents’ labour intensive work at the call centre, provide fertile ground for the agents’ verbal outbursts which are oriented to as interpersonally sensitive by the customers in so far as they are interpreted as inappropriate and potentially impolite. The analysis draws on the notion of face and incorporates a variety of concepts from pragmatics and Conversation Analysis.
Keywords: calls for information, institutional asymmetries, impoliteness, epistemic mismatch, overt other-initiated repair, face
Published online: 20 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.06ort
References (60)
Antaki, Charles. 1994. Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Archer, Dawn, and Piotr Jagodziński. 2015. “Call Centre Interaction: A Case of Sanctioned Face Attack?” Journal of Pragmatics 761: 46–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. 2013. “Face as a Research Focus in Interpersonal Pragmatics: Relational and Emic Perspectives.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 108–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Steven Levinson. 1978. “Universals of Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness, ed. by Ester Goody, 56–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 2012. “Address Terms in the Organization of Turns at Talk: The Case of Pivotal Turn Extensions.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (13): 1853–1867. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2006. “Indexing Stance: Reported Speech as an Interactional Evidential.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (5): 569–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Tracy, and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. “Analysing Talk at Work: an Introduction.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2005. “‘Yes, Tell me Please, What Time is the Midday Flight From Athens Arriving?’: Telephone Service Encounters and Politeness.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (3): 253–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Publications in Conduct and Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1999. “Inference.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9 (1–2): 131–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2015. Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2013. “Turn Allocation and Turn Sharing.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 167–190. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1985. “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 95–117. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 271: 291–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Epistemics in Conversation.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1985. “An Exercise in the Transcription and Analysis of Laughter.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 25–34. London, Orlando, San Diego & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1987. “On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R.E. Lee, 86–100. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel, and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Cathérine. 2005. “Politeness in France: How to Buy Bread Politely.” In Politeness in Europe, ed. by Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart, 29–44. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia. 2013. “Repair.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 229–256. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kuroshima, Satomi. 2010. “Another Look at the Service Encounter: Progressivity, Intersubjectivity, and Trust in a Japanese Sushi Restaurant.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3): 856–869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hee. 2009. “Extended Requesting: Interaction and Collaboration in the Production and Specification of Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (6): 1248–1271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene. 2003. “Selecting Next Speaker: The Context Sensitive Operation of a Context-Free Organisation.” Language in Society 321: 177–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Marilyn. 1976. “On Questions Following Questions in Service Encounters.” Language in Society 51: 315–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1977. “The Playback: An Instance of Variation in Discourse.” In Studies in Language Variation, ed. by Ralph Fasold and Roger W. Shuy, 198–208. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina. 2005. “Complaint Calls to a Caregiver Service Company: The Case of Desahogo.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (4): 481–514.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Interactional Closeness in Service Calls to a Montevidean Carer Service Company.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39 (1): 7–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Intra-Cultural Variation: Explanations in Service Calls to Two Montevidean Service Providers.” Journal of Politeness Research 4 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “How to Get Rid of a Telemarketing Agent? Facework Strategies in an Intercultural Service Call.” In Face, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Michael Haugh, 55–77. London & Oakville, Conn.: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2013. “The Dynamics of Complaining in a Latin American for-Profit Commercial Setting.” Journal of Pragmatics 571: 231–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orthaber, Sara, and Rosina Márquez Reiter. 2011. “‘Talk to the hand’. Complaints to a Public Transport Company.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (15): 3860–3876. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “‘Thanks for Nothing’: Impoliteness in Service Calls.“ In Exploring (Im)politeness in Specialized and General Corpora: Converging Methodologies and Analytic Procedures, ed. by Şükriye Ruhi and Yeşim Askan, 11–39. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. “Telling my Side: ‘Limited Access’ as a ‘Fishing Device’.” Sociological Inquiry 501: 186–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. “Pursuing a Response.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 152–164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage. 2013. “Preference.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/no Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 681: 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rendle-Short, Johanna. 2007. “‘Catherine, You’re Wasting Your Time’: Address Terms within the Australian Political Interview.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 1503–1525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language and Society 29(1): 1–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Chloe, Alexa Hepburn, and Jonathan Potter. 2013. “Having the Last Laugh: On Post Completion Laughter Particles.” In Studies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. by Phillip Glenn and Elizabeth Holt, 91–106. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimanoff, Susan B. 1994. “Gender Perspectives on Facework: Simplistic Stereotypes vs. Complex Realities.” In The Challenge of Facework. Cross-Cultural and Interpersonal Issues, ed. by Stella Ting-Toomey, 159–208. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano. 2012. “Mobilising Response in Interaction: A Compositional View of Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 58–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, Jan. 2008. “Trying the Easiest Solution First in Other-Initiation of Repair.” Journal of Pragmatics 401: 333–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “On Being Heard in Emergency Calls. The Development of Hostility in a Fatal Emergency Call.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (11): 1393–1412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat. 1987. “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2): 205–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 2011. “A Facework System of Minimal Politeness: Oral Argument in Appellate Court.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 7 (1): 123–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varcasia, Cecilia. 2013. Business and Service Telephone Conversations: An Investigation of British English, German and Italian Encounters. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ventola, Eija. 1987. The Structure of Social Interaction. A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne. 2000. Intonation in Text and Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Susan, and Celia Kitzinger. 2006. “Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 69 (2): 150–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zapf, Dieter, Amela Isic, Myriam Bechtoldt, and Patricia Blau. 2003. “What is Typical for Call Centre Jobs? Job Characteristics, and Service Interactions in Different Call Centres.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 12 (4): 311–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Don. 1992. “The Interactional Organization of Calls for Emergency Assistance.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Nielsen, Kristina
2022. Call center timespace and working from home. Sociolinguistic Studies 16:1 DOI logo
Tovar, Johanna
2022. Current trends and the way forward on call center research in a post-covid world. Sociolinguistic Studies 16:1 DOI logo
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2021. Service Encounter Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 496 ff. DOI logo
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
2019. Chapter 5. Navigating commercial constraints in a service call. In Technology Mediated Service Encounters [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 300], ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Orthaber, Sara
2019. Aggressive humour as a means of voicing customer dissatisfaction and creating in-group identity. Journal of Pragmatics 152 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Orthaber, Sara
2022. ‘Silence is not always golden’. Sociolinguistic Studies 16:1 DOI logo
TRAVERSO, VÉRONIQUE
2019. Demander de l'aide à la permanence d'accès aux droits d'un centre social: modalités de construction des requêtes. Journal of French Language Studies 29:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Márquez Reiter, Rosina & Sara Orthaber
2018. Exploring the moral compass. Internet Pragmatics 1:2 ► pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Márquez Reiter, Rosina & Sara Orthaber
2020. Exploring the moral compass. In (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions [Benjamins Current Topics, 107], ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Márquez Reiter, Rosina & Patricia Bou-Franch
2017. (Im)politeness in Service Encounters. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 661 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.