Article published In:
(Co-)Constructing Interpersonally Sensitive Activities Across Institutional SettingsEdited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Rosina Márquez Reiter
[Pragmatics and Society 7:4] 2016
► pp. 638–663
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Rosina Márquez Reiter
[Pragmatics and Society 7:4] 2016
► pp. 638–663
When routine calls for information become interpersonally sensitive
This paper examines interpersonally sensitive exchanges in two calls for information to the call centre of a public transport company. In order to provide relevant information and facilitate sequence progressivity, the agents need to go through specific steps. Although this is typical of institutional settings, customers may not necessarily be aware of them. The excerpts examined in this paper show how the customers’ lack of knowledge of the institutional steps the agents have to go through to attend to their requests and customers’ claims to product knowledge, coupled with the agents’ labour intensive work at the call centre, provide fertile ground for the agents’ verbal outbursts which are oriented to as interpersonally sensitive by the customers in so far as they are interpreted as inappropriate and potentially impolite. The analysis draws on the notion of face and incorporates a variety of concepts from pragmatics and Conversation Analysis.
References
Antaki, Charles
1994 Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts. London: Sage.
Archer, Dawn, and Piotr Jagodziński
2015 “Call Centre Interaction: A Case of Sanctioned Face Attack?” Journal of Pragmatics 761: 46–66. 
Arundale, Robert B.
2013 “Face as a Research Focus in Interpersonal Pragmatics: Relational and Emic Perspectives.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 108–120.
Brown, Penelope, and Steven Levinson
1978 “Universals of Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness, ed. by Ester Goody, 56–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clayman, Steven E.
2012 “Address Terms in the Organization of Turns at Talk: The Case of Pivotal Turn Extensions.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (13): 1853–1867.
Clift, Rebecca
2006 “Indexing Stance: Reported Speech as an Interactional Evidential.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (5): 569–595.
Corbett, Greville G.
2000 Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Curl, Tracy, and Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153.
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992 “Analysing Talk at Work: an Introduction.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
2005 “ ‘Yes, Tell me Please, What Time is the Midday Flight From Athens Arriving?’: Telephone Service Encounters and Politeness.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (3): 253–273.
Goffman, Erving
1967 Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
1981 Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Publications in Conduct and Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, Charles
1981 Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
Gumperz, John J.
1999 “Inference.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9 (1–2): 131–133.
Haugh, Michael
2015 Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hayashi, Makoto
2013 “Turn Allocation and Turn Sharing.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 167–190. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Heritage, John
1985 “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 95–117. New York: Academic Press.
1998 “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 271: 291–334.
2013 “Epistemics in Conversation.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Jefferson, Gail
1985 “An Exercise in the Transcription and Analysis of Laughter.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 25–34. London, Orlando, San Diego & New York: Academic Press.
1987 “On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R.E. Lee, 86–100. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Kádár, Daniel, and Michael Haugh
2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Cathérine
2005 “Politeness in France: How to Buy Bread Politely.” In Politeness in Europe, ed. by Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart, 29–44. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi
2015 “Closing the Gap in Customer Service Encounters: Customers’ Use of Upshot Formulations to Manage Service Responses.” Pragmatics & Society 6 (1): 67–88.
Kitzinger, Celia
2013 “Repair.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 229–256. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Kuroshima, Satomi
2010 “Another Look at the Service Encounter: Progressivity, Intersubjectivity, and Trust in a Japanese Sushi Restaurant.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3): 856–869.
Lee, Seung-Hee
2009 “Extended Requesting: Interaction and Collaboration in the Production and Specification of Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (6): 1248–1271.
Lerner, Gene
2003 “Selecting Next Speaker: The Context Sensitive Operation of a Context-Free Organisation.” Language in Society 321: 177–201.
Merritt, Marilyn
1976 “On Questions Following Questions in Service Encounters.” Language in Society 51: 315–357.
1977 “The Playback: An Instance of Variation in Discourse.” In Studies in Language Variation, ed. by Ralph Fasold and Roger W. Shuy, 198–208. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
2005 “Complaint Calls to a Caregiver Service Company: The Case of Desahogo.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (4): 481–514.
2006 “Interactional Closeness in Service Calls to a Montevidean Carer Service Company.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39 (1): 7–39.
2008 “Intra-Cultural Variation: Explanations in Service Calls to Two Montevidean Service Providers.” Journal of Politeness Research 4 (1): 1–29.
2009 “How to Get Rid of a Telemarketing Agent? Facework Strategies in an Intercultural Service Call.” In Face, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Michael Haugh, 55–77. London & Oakville, Conn.: Equinox.
2013 “The Dynamics of Complaining in a Latin American for-Profit Commercial Setting.” Journal of Pragmatics 571: 231–247.
Orthaber, Sara, and Rosina Márquez Reiter
2011 “ ‘Talk to the hand’. Complaints to a Public Transport Company.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (15): 3860–3876.
2015 “‘Thanks for Nothing’: Impoliteness in Service Calls.“ In Exploring (Im)politeness in Specialized and General Corpora: Converging Methodologies and Analytic Procedures, ed. by Şükriye Ruhi and Yeşim Askan, 11–39. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Pomerantz, Anita
1980 “Telling my Side: ‘Limited Access’ as a ‘Fishing Device’.” Sociological Inquiry 501: 186–198.
1984 “Pursuing a Response.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 152–164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage
2013 “Preference.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/no Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 681: 939–967.
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2007 “ ‘Catherine, You’re Wasting Your Time’: Address Terms within the Australian Political Interview.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 1503–1525.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2000 “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language and Society 29(1): 1–63.
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382.
Shaw, Chloe, Alexa Hepburn, and Jonathan Potter
2013 “Having the Last Laugh: On Post Completion Laughter Particles.” In Studies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. by Phillip Glenn and Elizabeth Holt, 91–106. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Shimanoff, Susan B.
1994 “Gender Perspectives on Facework: Simplistic Stereotypes vs. Complex Realities.” In The Challenge of Facework. Cross-Cultural and Interpersonal Issues, ed. by Stella Ting-Toomey, 159–208. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2012 “Mobilising Response in Interaction: A Compositional View of Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 58–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Svennevig, Jan
2008 “Trying the Easiest Solution First in Other-Initiation of Repair.” Journal of Pragmatics 401: 333–348.
2012 “On Being Heard in Emergency Calls. The Development of Hostility in a Fatal Emergency Call.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (11): 1393–1412.
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat
1987 “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2): 205–216.
Tracy, Karen
2011 “A Facework System of Minimal Politeness: Oral Argument in Appellate Court.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 7 (1): 123–146.
Varcasia, Cecilia
2013 Business and Service Telephone Conversations: An Investigation of British English, German and Italian Encounters. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ventola, Eija
1987 The Structure of Social Interaction. A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.
Wichmann, Anne
2000 Intonation in Text and Discourse. London: Longman.
Wilkinson, Susan, and Celia Kitzinger
2006 “Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 69 (2): 150–182.
Zapf, Dieter, Amela Isic, Myriam Bechtoldt, and Patricia Blau
2003 “What is Typical for Call Centre Jobs? Job Characteristics, and Service Interactions in Different Call Centres.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 12 (4): 311–340.
Zimmerman, Don
1992 “The Interactional Organization of Calls for Emergency Assistance.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 11 other publications
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2021. Service Encounter Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 496 ff. 
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
2019. Chapter 5. Navigating commercial constraints in a service call. In Technology Mediated Service Encounters [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 300], ► pp. 121 ff.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina & Patricia Bou-Franch
2017. (Im)politeness in Service Encounters. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 661 ff.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina & Sara Orthaber
Márquez Reiter, Rosina & Sara Orthaber
2020. Exploring the moral compass. In (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions [Benjamins Current Topics, 107], ► pp. 37 ff.
Nielsen, Kristina
2022. Call center timespace and working from home. Sociolinguistic Studies 16:1
Orthaber, Sara
2019. Aggressive humour as a means of voicing customer dissatisfaction and creating in-group identity. Journal of Pragmatics 152 ► pp. 160 ff.
Orthaber, Sara
2022. ‘Silence is not always golden’. Sociolinguistic Studies 16:1
Tovar, Johanna
2022. Current trends and the way forward on call center research in a post-covid world. Sociolinguistic Studies 16:1
TRAVERSO, VÉRONIQUE
2019. Demander de l'aide à la permanence d'accès aux droits d'un centre social: modalités de construction des requêtes. Journal of French Language Studies 29:1 ► pp. 113 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.