Article published in:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:1 (2017) ► pp. 38–60

The very sensitive question

Chronotopes, insecurity and Farsi heritage language classrooms

| University of Copenhagen
| University of Basel
This paper engages with ideological difference, education, and expressions of insecurity on the basis of a year-long ethnographic fieldwork in two Farsi heritage language classrooms and the group of Iranian immigrants organized around these classrooms in Copenhagen, Denmark. We show how insecurity and surveillance gave meaning to different space-times, or chronotopes (Bakhtin 1981), evoked by the participants, and to the understandings of community. The contemporary state of Iran and political and religious ideologies associated with this were subject to taboo in class but not necessarily elsewhere. We argue that this partly motivated the structure and content of the classroom, as the teacher tried to create a neutral space for children whose parents’ ideological backgrounds were potentially incompatible. This could liberate the children from their parents’ anxieties and it made the teacher’s job less vulnerable. Linguistic Ethnography (Rampton 2007) is the analytic framework of the paper.
Keywords: heritage language, classroom interaction, chronotopes, surveillance, (in)security, linguistic ethnography


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 25 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.1.03kar

Full-text

The very sensitive question
References

[ p. 57 ]References

Agha, Asif
2007 “Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime.” Language & Communication 27: 320–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Balzacq, Thierry
2011 “A theory of securitization: origins, core assumptions and variants.” In Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve, ed. by Thierry Balzacq, 1–30. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011 “Enquiries into methods: a new framework for securitization analysis.” In Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve, ed. by Thierry Balzacq, 31–53. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bigo, Didier
2008 “Globalised (in)Security: the Field and the Ban-opticon.” In Terror, Insecurity and Liberty. Illiberal practices of liberal regimes after 9/11, ed. by Didier Bigo and Anastasia Tsoukala, 10–48. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blackledge, Adrian, and Angela Creese
2009 “‘Because Tumi Bengali’: Inventing and disinventing the national in multilingual communities in the UK.” Ethnicities 9 (4): 451–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2015 “Chronotopes, scales and complexity in the study of language in society.” Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 121. Tilburg University. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borjian, Maryam
2013 English in Post-Revolutionary Iran. From Indigenization to Internationalization. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver
2003 Regions and Power: The Structure of International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde
1998 Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Charalambous, Constadina
2012 “‘Republica de Kubros’: Transgression and collusion in Greek-Cypriot adolescents’ classroom ‘silly-talk’.” Linguistics and Education 23 (3): 334–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charalambous, Constadina, and Ben Rampton
2010 “Other-language learning and intercultural communication in contexts of conflict.” Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies 60. King’s College London. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creese, Angela, Chao-Jung Wu, and Adrian Blackledge
2009 “Folk stories and social identification in multilingual classrooms.” Linguistics and Education 20: 350–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curdt-Christiansen and Xiao-Lan
2008 “Reading the World Through Words: Cultural Themes in Heritage Chinese Language Textbooks.” Language and Education 22: 95–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dick, Hilary P.
2010 “Imagined lives and modernist chronotopes in Mexican nonmigrant discourse.” American ethnologist 37 (2): 275–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Digard, Jean-Pierre, Bernard Hourcade, and Yann Richard
1996 L’Iran au XXe siècle. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Elling, Rasmus C.
2013 Minorities in Iran, nationalism and ethnicity after Khomeini. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
[ p. 58 ]
Emmers, Ralf
2013 “Securitization.” In Contemporary Security Studies, ed. by Alan Collins, 131–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A.
2001 “300-plus years of heritage language education in the United States.” In Heritage languages in America: preserving a national resource, ed. by J. K. Peyton, Joy Kreeft, Donald A. Ranard, and Scott McGinnis, 81–95. Washington, D.C. & McHenry, Ill.: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.Google Scholar
Fleming, Luke, and Michael Lempert
2011 “Introduction: Bad words.” Anthropological Quarterly 84 (1): 5–14. (Special issue: “The unmentionable: Verbal taboo and the moral life of language”). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Judith Irvine
1995 “The Boundaries of Language and Disciplines: How Ideologies Construct Difference.” Social Research 62 (4): 967–1001.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 [1967] Interactional Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Daniel M.
2010 “Toward a Critical Anthropology of Security.” Current Anthropology 51 (4): 487–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haggerty, Kevin D., and Minas Samatas
2010 “Introduction: Surveillance and democracy: an unsettled relationship.” In Surveillance and democracy, ed. by Kevin D. Haggerty and Minas Samatas, 1–16. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huysman, Jan
2011 “What’s in an act? On security speech acts and little security nothings.” Security Dialogue 42: 371–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karrebæk, Martha S., and Narges Ghandchi
2015 “‘Pure’ Farsi and Political Sensitivities: Language and Ideologies in Farsi Complementary Language Classrooms in Denmark.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 19 (1): 62–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Kamran
2014a “Citizenship, securitization and suspicion in UK ESOL policy.” Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies 130.Google Scholar
2014b “Security, unease and the ‘promise of English’.” Presentation, King’s College London, March 2014.Google Scholar
Li, Jinling, Kasper Juffermans, and Sjaak Kroon
2012 “Chineseness as a moving target.” Tilburg Working Papers in Culture Studies 19. Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Lyon, David
2007 Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Maybin, Janet, and Karin Tusting
2011 “Linguistic ethnography.” In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics, ed. by James Simpson, 515–528. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
1979 ““What time is it Denise?”: Asking known information question in classroom discourse.” Theory into Practice 18 (4): 285–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mendel, Yonatan
2013 “A Sentiment-Free Arabic: On the Creation of the Israeli Accelerated Arabic Language Studies Programme.” Middle Eastern Studies 49 (3): 383–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mobasher, Mohsen M.
2012 Iranians in Texas: Migration, Politics, and Ethnic Identity. Austin: The University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben
2014 “Gumperz and governmentality in the 21st century: Interaction, power and subjectivity.” Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies 136. King’s College London.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben, Janet Maybin, and Celia Roberts
2015 “Methodological foundations in linguistic ethnography”. In Linguistic Ethnography: Interdisciplinary Explorations, ed. by Julia Snell, Sara Shaw, and Fiona Copland, 14–50. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 59 ]
Rampton, Ben, Constadina Charalambous, and Panayiota Charalambous
2014 “Desecuritising Turkish: Teaching the language of a former enemy, and intercultural language education.” Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 137. King’s College London.Google Scholar
Riskedahl, Diane
2007 “A sign of war: The strategic use of violent imagery in contemporary Lebanese political rhetoric.” Language & Communication 27: 307–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
2005 “Axes of Evals: Token versus Type Interdiscursivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 6–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna, and Jennifer Coates
2005 “The sociolinguistics of narrative: Identity, performance and culture.” In The sociolinguistics of narrative, ed. by Joanna Thornborrow, and Jennifer Coates, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, Allon J.
2010 “Arabic instruction in Jewish schools and in universities in Israel; Contradictions, subversion and the politics of pedagogy.” International Middle Eastern Studies 42: 291–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Arabs and Arabic Grammar Instruction in Israeli Universities: Alterity, Alienation and Dislocation.” Middle East Critique 21 (1): 101–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Urban, Greg
1996 Metaphysical Community: The Interplay of the Sense and the Intellect. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
2005 “Politics, Ideology, and Discourse.” In Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, volume on Politics and Language, ed. by Ruth Wodak, 728–740.Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole
1995 “Securitization and desecuritization.” In On Security, ed. by Ronnie D. Lipschutz, 46–86. New York: Colum¬bia University Press.[ p. 60 ]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Karrebæk, Martha Sif & Özgün Nergiz
2019. Language ideologies, the soft g, and parody in the Turkish mother tongue classroom. Multilingua 38:6 ► pp. 625 ff. Crossref logo
Mey, Jacob L.
2017. Corpus Linguistics: Some (Meta-)Pragmatic Reflections. Corpus Pragmatics 1:3 ► pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.