Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:2 (2017) ► pp.161–182

“Can I say something?”

Meta turn-taking in natural talk

| University of York
In English the organization of talk into turns is routinely accomplished through a complex system of implicit, non-lexical cues. However, explicit verbalizations, such as “I haven’t finished” or “Can I say something?” do exist. This paper investigates instances in which participants employ meta formulations to structure their interaction. It describes their forms, sequential locations and interactional relevance. Speakers are found to make meta references to turn beginnings, both their own and those of others; and turn completions, typically by others. Meta turn-taking actions are used as a last resort, after other, implicit turn-taking strategies have failed; as a strategy to secure turn space; as a way of eliciting specific next actions; as a practice for initiating repair; and as a more general strategy for committing to a specific course of action.
Keywords: Conversation Analysis, turn-taking, turn beginning, turn completion, speaker selection, meta talk, formulations
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data
  • 3.Talking about talk
  • 4.Forms and functions of meta turn-taking
    • 4.1Meta self-starts: Securing and legitimizing turn space
    • 4.2Explicit prompts: Eliciting and facilitating next actions
    • 4.3Meta cut-offs: Managing turn transitions and repair initiation
      • 4.3.1Meta cut-offs with ‘wait’
      • 4.3.2Meta cut-offs with ‘shut up’ and its variants
  • 5.Summary and concluding remarks
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.2.01szc
References (46)
References
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1996. “On the prosody and syntax of turn-taking.” In Prosody and Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, 57–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuff, Edward C., and Wesley W. Sharrock. 1985. Meetings. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Volume 3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 149–160. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Deterding, David, and Ee Ling Low. 2001. “The NIE Corpus of Spoken Singapore English (NIECSSE).” SAAL Quarterly 561: 2–5.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2000. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, and Sandra A. Thompson, and Nii Martey. 2003. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., and Robert Englebretson. 2004. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 3. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
. 2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “Practices in the Construction of Turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited.” Pragmatics 6 (3): 427–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 134–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. 2001. “An exploration of prosody and turn projection in English conversation.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margaret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 287–315. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
French, Peter, and John Local. 1986. “Prosodic features and the management of interruptions.” In Intonation in Discourse, ed. by Catherine Johns-Lewis, 157–180. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela C. 1991. “Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argumentative talk.” American Sociological Review 561: 818–835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1980. “Restarts, pauses and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn beginning.” Sociological Inquiry 501: 272–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greatbatch, David. 1988. “A turn-taking system for British news interviews.” Language in Society 17 (3): 401–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John M. Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Oh-prefaced responses to enquiry.” Language in Society 271: 291–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Conversation Analysis and institutional talk.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Robert Sanders and Kristine L. Fitch, 103–146. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Heritage, John and D. Greatbatch. 1991. “On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews.” In Talk and Social Structure, ed. by Deidre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, 93–137. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 1997. “Turn-taking and verbal affixes in Korean conversation.” Language Research 33 (4): 601–627.Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoting. 2013. “Language and the body in the construction of units in Mandarin face-to-face interaction.” In Units of Talk – Units of Action, ed. by Beatrice B. Szczepek Reed and Geoffrey Raymond, 343–375. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Local, John, Bill Wells, and Mark Sebba. 1985. “Phonology for conversation. Phonetic aspects of turn delimitation in London Jamaican.” Journal of Pragmatics 91: 309–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Local, John, John Kelly, and Bill Wells. 1986. “Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English.” Journal of Linguistics 221: 411–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McHoul, Alexander. 1978. “The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom.” Language in Society 71: 183–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1985. “The structure of classroom discourse.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Volume 3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 120–131. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard. 2001. “Turn-holding, turn-yielding and laryngeal activity in Finnish talk-in-interaction.” Journal of the International Phonetics Association 311: 139–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Non-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnish.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 29–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi. 1995. AIDS Counselling: Institutional Interaction and Clinical Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No type Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 681 (DEC): 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossano, Frederico, Penelope Brown, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. “Gaze, questioning and culture.” In Conversation Analysis. Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 187–249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Ruiter, Jan-Peter, Holger Mitterer, and Nicholas J. Enfield. 2006. “Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation.” Language 82 (3): 515–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. “Sequencing in conversational openings.” American Anthropologist 701: 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980. “Preliminaries to preliminaries: ‘Can I ask you a question’”. Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 104–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. “Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action.” American Journal of Sociology 1041: 161–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The preference for self- correction in the organization of repair in conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “The constructing of units in conversational talk.” Language in Society 291: 477–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Birgit Barden, Jörg Bergmann, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Susanne Günthner, Christoph Meier, Uta Quasthoff, Peter Schoblinski, Susanne Uhmann. 1998. “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT).” Linguistische Berichte 1731: 91–122.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, and Ulrike Hartge. 1992. “Gestures at the transition place.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer and Aldo di Luzio, 135–157. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice B. 2004. “Turn-final intonation in English.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Cecilia E. Ford, 97–118. Benjamins, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko. 1999. Turn-taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wells, Bill, and Sue Peppè. 1996. “Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and turn-taking in English Dialects.” In Prosody and Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 101–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Bill, and Sarah Macfarlane. 1998. “Prosody as an interactional resource: Turn-projection and overlap.” Language and Speech 41 (3/4): 265–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Busch, Florian, Pepe Droste & Elisa Wessels
2022. Sprachreflexive Praktiken*. In Sprachreflexive Praktiken [LiLi: Studien zu Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 4], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.