Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:2 (2017) ► pp.281–311

Metaphors of parliamentary budget debates in times of crisis

The case of the UK and the Montenegrin parliament

| University of Montenegro

The aim of this paper is to explore the metaphoric imprint the global financial crisis has left on the discourse of parliamentary budget debates, which are at the intersection of political and economic discourse, as well as the imprint the MPs have tried to leave on the electorate by carefully selecting metaphors to hide agency, disclaim responsibility and project themselves as saviours. We focus both on conceptual and linguistic metaphors, trying, simultaneously, to account for how the metaphors are developed in the debate. The corpus comprises two budget debates held at the time the financial crisis was in full swing (conducted in the Parliament of Montenegro and the UK House of Commons). The recurrent conceptual metaphors related to the economic crisis were analysed for the two parts of the corpus respectively – the results were compared and similarities were observed in terms of the metaphors used and the discourse strategies behind their selection.

Keywords: parliamentary debate, conceptual metaphor, linguistic metaphor, economic crisis, disclaiming responsibility, hiding agency
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Parliamentary discourse
    • 2.2Metaphor in cognitive linguistics
      • Conceptual metaphor and politics
      • Conceptual metaphor and the economy
      • Metaphor development in talk
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.The Montenegrin data
  • 5.The UK data
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.2.06sta
References
Anderson, Richard
2004 “The Causal Power of Metaphor in Politics: Cueing Democratic Identities in Russia and Beyond.” In Metaphorical World Politics: Rhetorics of Democracy, War and Globalization, ed. by Francis Beer and Christ'l De Landtsheer, 91–120. East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan University PressGoogle Scholar
Archakis, Argiris, and Villy Tsakona
2010 “'The Wolf Wakes up inside Them, Grows Werewolf Hair and Reveals All Their Bullying': The Representation of Parliamentary Discourse in Greek Newspapers”. Journal of Pragmatics 421: 912–923. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Richard
2003 “Conceptual Metaphor, Language, Literature and Pedagogy.” Journal of Language and Learning 1 (2): 59–72.Google Scholar
Bayley, Paul
2004 “The Whys and Wherefores of Analysing Parliamentary Discourse.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 1–44. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Lynne
2008 “Metaphor Shifting in the Dynamics of Talk”. In Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach, ed. by Mara Sophia Zanotto, Lynne Cameron and Marinda Cavalcanti, 45–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2000 “Metaphor and Vocabulary Reaching in ESP Economics”. English for Specific Purposes: An International Journal 19 (2): 149–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chifane, Cristina
2013 “Metaphors of the Crisis – A Reflection of the Global Financial Situation.” Management Strategies Journal 22 (4): 78–84.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul, and Mikhail Ilyin
1993 “Metaphor in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Common European House’”. Discourse & Society 4 (7): 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Siaw-Fong, and Kathleen Ahrens
2004 “Teaching Economy Metaphors: A Psycholinguistic Perspective through the CMM.” In the Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium and Book Fair on English Teaching, Vol. 21, 1–12. Taipei, Taiwan: English Teachers Association.Google Scholar
Cortés de los Ríos, María Enriqueta
2010 “Cognitive Devices to Communicate the Economic Crisis: An Analysis through Covers in the Economist.” Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE) 201: 81–106.Google Scholar
Dorst, Aletta G.
2011 Metaphor in fiction: Language, Thought and Communication. Oisterwijk, Netherlands: BOXpress.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1995 Critical Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Federica
2007 “Metaphor at Work in the Analysis of Political Discourse: Investigating a ‘Preventive War’ Persuasion Strategy”. Discourse & Society 18 (5): 603–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadavanij, Savitri
2002 “Intertextuality as Discourse Strategy: The Case of No-Confidence Debates in Thailand”. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 91: 35–55.Google Scholar
Gelabert-Desnoyer, Jaime
2008 “Not So Impersonal: Intentionality in the Use of Pronoun Uno in Contemporary Spanish Political Discourse”. Pragmatics 18 (3): 407–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, Andrew
1997 The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, Patrick
2006 “Metaphoricity is Gradable”. In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch and Stefan Gries, 17–35. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher
2005 “Analysing Political Discourse: Toward a Cognitive Approach”. Critical Discourse Studies 2 (2): 189–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1985 “Analysing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an “Overhearing” Audience”. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol. III1, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 95–119. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, J. Berenike
2013 Metaphor in Academic Discourse: Linguistic Forms, Conceptual Structures, Communicative Functions and Cognitive Representations. LOT Dissertation Series, 333. Utrecht: Utrecht Univversity/LOT.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, Siaw-Fong Chung, and Kathleen Ahrens
2006 “An Ontology-Based Exploration of Knowledge Systems for Metaphor.” In Ontologies: A Handbook of Principles, Concepts and Applications in Information Systems. Volume 141, ed. by Raj Sharman, Rajiv Kishore, and Ram Ramesh, 489–517. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2003 “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates”. Journal of Language and Politics 2 (1): 71–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Insulting as (Un)Parliamentary Practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A Rhetorical Approach. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 45–86. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
2003 “Metaphor and War, Again”. [URL] (accessed on 27.01.2010)
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live by. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner
1989 More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moser, Karin
2004 “The Role of Metaphors in Acquiring and Transmitting Knowledge”. In European Perspectives on Learning at Work: The Acquisition of Work Process Knowledge, ed. by Martin Fischer, Nicholas Boreham, and Barry Nyhan, 148–165. Luxembourg: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.Google Scholar
Muller, Cornelia
2008 Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Ralph
2005 “Creative Metaphors in Political Discourse. Theoretical Considerations on the Basis of Swiss Speeches”. Metaphoric.de 91: 53–73.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2004 Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 9 (3): 301–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mutua, Makau
2001 “Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights.” Harvard International Law Journal 42 (1): 201–245.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Kathleen Therese
1998 “Money and Finance as Solid, Liquid, and Gas in Spanish”. Metaphor and Symbol 13 (2): 141–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orts, María Angeles, and Ana Rojo
2009 “Metaphor Framing in Spanish Economic Discourse: A Corpus-Based Approach to Metaphor Analysis in the Global Systemic Crisis”. In A Survey of Corpus-Based Research [Recurso electrónico], ed. by Pascual Cantos Gómez and Aquilino Sánchez Pérez, 182–195. Universidad de Murcia: AELINCO.Google Scholar
Pasma, Tryntje
2011 Metaphor and Register Variation: The Personalisation of Dutch News Discourse. Oisterwijk, Netherlands: BOXpress.Google Scholar
Perović, Slavica
2009 Jezik u akciji ['Language in Action']. Podgorica: CID.Google Scholar
Rasiah, Parameswary
2007 Evasion in Australia’s Parliamentary Question Time. Perth: University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Ritchie, David
2003 “ argument is war – Or Is It a Game of Chess? Multiple Meanings in the Analysis of Implicit Metaphors.” Metaphor and Symbol 18 (2): 125–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rječnik srpsko­hrvatskoga književnog jezika ['Dictionary of written Serbo-Croatian']
1967 Novi Sad & Zagreb: Matica srpska i Matica hrvatska.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena, and Michela Masci
1996 “Politics is Football: Metaphor in the Discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy”. Discourse and Society 7 (2): 243–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shenhav, Shaul
2008 “Showing and Telling in Parliamentary Discourse: The Case of Repeated Interjections to Rabin’s Speeches in the Israeli Parliament”. Discourse and Society 19(2): 223–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silaški, Nadežda and Tatjana Đurović
2010 “The Conceptualisation of the Global Financial Crisis via the Economy Is a Person Metaphor – A Contrastive Study of English and Serbian”. Belgrade: Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 8 (2): 129–139.Google Scholar
Silaški, Nadežda
2013 “Translating Metaphorical Economic Terms from English into Serbian – Some Strategies and Challenges.” In Philological Reasearch Today – Language, Literature and Communication: Current Issues in Linguistic Research, ed. by Julijana Vučo and Vesna Polovina, 351–370. Belgrade: University of Belgrade.Google Scholar
Silaški, Nadežda and Annamaria Kilyeni
2014 “The Money is Solid Metaphor in Economic and Business Terminology in English.” Professional Communication and Translation Studies 71: 73–80.Google Scholar
Škara, Danica
2009 “Jezična/mentalna rekonstrukcija EU prostora: nove konceptualne metafore“. ['Linguistic/mental reconstruction of the EU space: New conceptual metaphors']. In Hrvatski na putu u EU [‘Croatia on its way to the EU’], ed. by Maja Bratanić, 1–28. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Hiroshi
2010 “Central Banking as Fluid Dynamics: A Comparative Study of English and Japanese Metaphors of Money”. Language Research Bulletin 251: 1–18.Google Scholar
van der Valk, Ineke
2003 “Right-Wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in France”. Discourse and Society 14(3): 309–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun
1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”. Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Tannen et al., 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wipf, Bettina
2010 Wine Writing Meets MIPVU: Linguistic Metaphor. Amsterdam: VU University.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
(ed.) 1989 Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Ahrens, Kathleen & Winnie Huiheng Zeng
2022. Referential and evaluative strategies of conceptual metaphor use in government discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 188 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana Belén
2020. The language of recovery. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Inya, Onwu
2022. ‘As democracy grows’. Metaphor and the Social World 12:2 ► pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
Perović, Slavica & Milica Vuković-Stamatović
2021. Universality and cultural variation in the conceptualisation of love via metaphors, metonymies and cultural scripts: The case of Montenegrin. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 85 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.