Article published in:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:3 (2017) ► pp. 323354


Albe, Virginie
2006 “Procédés discursifs et rôles sociaux d’élèves en groupes de discussion sur une controverse socio-scientifique.” Revue française de pédagogie 157: 103–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andriessen, Jerry, Mirjam Pardijs & Michael Baker
2013 “Getting on and Getting along.” In Affective Learning Together, ed. by Michael Baker, Sanna Järvelä & Jerry Andriessen, 205–229. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Oswald Ducrot
1997 [1981]L’argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Baker, Michael, Jerry Andriessen & Sanna Järvelä
2013Affective Learning Together. Social and Emotional Dimensions of Collaborative Learning. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
[ p. 348 ]
Baker, Michael & Jerry Andriessen
2009 “Socio-Relational, Affective and Cognitive Dimensions of CSCL Interactions.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (2), ed. by Angelique Dimitracopoulou, Claire O’Malley, Daniel Suthers & Peter Reimann, 31–33. International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Baker, Michael, Matthieu Quignard, Kristine Lund & Marije van Amelsvoort
2002 “Designing a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Situation for Broadening and Deepening Understanding of the Space of Debate”. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 55–61.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia & Richard W. Janney
1994 “Toward a Pragmatics of Emotive Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 22 (3–4): 325–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cahour, Béatrice
2013 “Emotions: Characteristics, Emergence and Circulation in Interactional Learning”. In Affective Learning Together, ed. by Michael Baker, Sanna Järvelä & Jerry Andriessen, 52–69. Basingstoke, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, Samantha R., Dana L. Zeidler & Troy D. Sadler
2009 “Moral Sensitivity in the Context of Socioscientific Issues in High School Science Students.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (2): 279–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erwin
1967Interaction Ritual: Esays in Face-to-face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Grize, Jean-Blaise
1997 [1990]Logique et langage. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L.
1970Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Kacem, Saida & Laurence Simonneaux
2009 “The Teaching of Socioscientific Issues in Interdisciplinarity Biology-Philosophy, an Ethical Stake and Citizenship Issue.” US-China Education Review 6 (2): 44–47.Google Scholar
Järvenoja, Hanna & Sanna Järvelä
2013 “Regulating Emotions Together for Motivated Collaboration”. In Affective Learning Together, ed. by Michael Baker, Sanna Järvelä & Jerry Andriessen, 162–181. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Micheli, Raphaël
2013 “Esquisse d’une typologie des modes de sémiotisation verbale de l’émotion”. Semen 35: 17–40.Google Scholar
2010L’émotion augmentée: l’abolition de la peine de mort dans le débat parlementaire français. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1958Traité de l’argumentation: la nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Plantin, Christian
2011Les bonnes raisons des émotions. Berne: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plantin, Christian, Marianne Doury & Véronique Traverso
2000Les émotions dans les interactions. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
Polo, Claire
2014L’eau à la bouche: ressources et travail argumentatifs des élèves lors de débats socio-scientifiques sur l’eau potable. PhD dissertation, Lyon 2 University.Google Scholar
Real Academia de la lengua Española
2001 “agotar”, Online Dictionary, 22th edition. http://​lema​.rae​.es​/drae​/?val​=agotar. Accessed October 30th 2014.
Roschelle, Jeremy & Stéphanie D. Teasley
1995 “The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving.” In The First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, ed. by Shelley V. Goldman, James G. Greeno, John L. Schnase & Edward L. Cunnius, 69–97. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simonneaux, Laurence & Jean Simonneaux
2009 “Students’ Socio-Scientific Reasoning on Controversies from the Viewpoint of Education for Sustainable Development.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 4 (3): 657–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 349 ]
Sins, Patrick & Karl Karlgren
2013 “Identifying and Overcoming Tension in Interdisciplinary Teamwork in Professional Development.” In Affective Learning Together, ed. by Michael Baker, Sanna Järvelä & Jerry Andriessen, 185–203. Basingstoke, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen E.
2003 [1958]The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich
1997 “Emotions and Emotional Language in English and German News Stories.” In The Language of Emotions, ed. by Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven, 307–328. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas
1992The Place of Emotion in Argument. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Zeidler, Danna L., Troy D. Sadler, Michael L. Simmons & Elaine V. Howes
2005 “Beyond STS: A Research-Based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education.” Science Education 89 (3): 357–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Polo, Claire
2020.  In Le Débat fertile,  pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo
Valero Haro, Anahuac, Omid Noroozi, Harm Biemans & Martin Mulder
2020. Argumentation Competence: Students’ Argumentation Knowledge, Behavior and Attitude and their Relationships with Domain-Specific Knowledge Acquisition. Journal of Constructivist Psychology  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.