Emotional positioning as a cognitive resource for arguing
Lessons from the study of Mexican students debating about drinking water management
This paper consists of a detailed analysis of how the participants in a debate build their emotional position during the interaction and how such a position is strongly related to the conclusion they defend. In this case study, teenage Mexican, students, arguing about access to drinking water, display extensive discursive work on the emotional tonality given to the issue. Plantin’s (2011) methodological tools are adopted to follow two alternative emotional framings produced by disagreeing students, starting from a common, highly negative, thymic tonality. Through the analysis of four parameters (distance to the problem; causality/agentivity; possibility of control and conformity to the norms) we describe how the emotional dimension of schematization (Grize 1997) is argumentatively relevant. In authentic discourse, it is impossible to separate emotion from reason. The conclusion section discusses the implications for the design of argumentation-based pedagogical activities.
Keywords: argumentation, schematization , norms, values, socio-scientific issues, emotional framing, group cognition
Published online: 27 October 2017
Andriessen, Jerry, Mirjam Pardijs & Michael Baker
Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Oswald Ducrot
Baker, Michael, Jerry Andriessen & Sanna Järvelä[ p. 348 ]
Baker, Michael & Jerry Andriessen
2009 “Socio-Relational, Affective and Cognitive Dimensions of CSCL Interactions.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (2), ed. by Angelique Dimitracopoulou, Claire O’Malley, Daniel Suthers & Peter Reimann, 31–33. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Baker, Michael, Matthieu Quignard, Kristine Lund & Marije van Amelsvoort
2002 “Designing a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Situation for Broadening and Deepening Understanding of the Space of Debate”. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 55–61.
Caffi, Claudia & Richard W. Janney
Fowler, Samantha R., Dana L. Zeidler & Troy D. Sadler
Kacem, Saida & Laurence Simonneaux
Järvenoja, Hanna & Sanna Järvelä
Perelman, Chaïm & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
Plantin, Christian, Marianne Doury & Véronique Traverso
Real Academia de la lengua Española
2001 “agotar”, Online Dictionary, 22th edition. http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=agotar. Accessed October 30th 2014.
Roschelle, Jeremy & Stéphanie D. Teasley
Simonneaux, Laurence & Jean Simonneaux[ p. 349 ]
Sins, Patrick & Karl Karlgren
Cited by 2 other publications
Valero Haro, Anahuac, Omid Noroozi, Harm Biemans & Martin Mulder
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.