Article published in:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:3 (2017) ► pp. 400420
References

References

Aijmer, Karin
2013Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Anthonissen, Christine
2006 “Critical Discourse Analysis as an Analytic Tool in Considering Selected Prominent Features of TRC Testimonies.” Journal of Language and Politics 5(1):171–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aull, L. Laura, and Zak Lancaster
2014 “Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writings: A corpus-based comparison.” Written Communication 32(2):151–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981The Dialogic Imagination (translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baratta, Alexander M.
2009 “Revealing Stance through Passive Voice.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1406–1421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Lawrence N.
2007 “Cooperative Conflict and Evasive Language: The Case of the 9–11 Commission Hearings.” In Context and Appropriateness, ed. by A. Fetzer, 167–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 418 ]
2008 “ ‘I Think, Therefore …’ Commitment in Political Testimony.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27 (4): 372–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Taryn
2009Justificatory Discourse of the Perpetrator in TRC Testimonies: A discourse-historical Analysis. Unpublished MA Thesis. Stellenbosch University.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006 “Stance in Spoken and Written University Registers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 97–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Bock, Zanni
2007A Discourse Analysis of Selected Truth and Reconciliation Commission Testimonies: Appraisal and Genre. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of the Western Cape.Google Scholar
2008 “ ‘Language has a heart’: Linguistic markers of evaluation in selected TRC testimonies.” Language of Multicultural Discourses 3(3):189–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Code-switching: An appraisal resource in TRC testimonies. Functions of Language, 18 (2): 183–209 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, Zanni, Ngwanya Mazwi, Sifundo Metula, and Nosisi Mpolweni-Zantsi
2006 “An Analysis of What Has Been ‘Lost’ in the Interpretation and Transcription Process of Selected TRC Testimonies.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 33:1–26.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, Silvia
2009 “Reformulation and Conflict in the Witness Examination: The case of Public Inquiries.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 22 (2): 209–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, & Danae Paolino
1993 “Outline of discourse transcription.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research ed. by Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
2007 “Stancetaking in Discourse: An Introduction.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996 “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by K. Fischer, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2009 “An Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of Pragmatics 1: 293–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “The Sequencing of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.” Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 1: 29–35Google Scholar
2013 “Combinations of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.” International Review of Pragmatics 5: 318–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “The Combining of Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 86: 48–53, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany and Douglas Biber
2015 “Stance Markers.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann, 219–248 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005 “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keisanen, Tina and Elise Kärkkäinen
2014 “Stance.” In Pragmatics of Discourse, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Baron, 295–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter White
2005the Language age of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 419 ]
Mei, S. Wu
2006 “Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical Stance: Investigating the Strategy of Problemitisation in Students’ Argumentation.” RELC 37 (3): 329–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meinig, Bob
1998Public Hearings: When and How to Hold Them. MRSC Publications. Retrieved June 2, 2008 from http://​www​.mrsc​.org​/focuspub​/hearings​.aspx
Mey, Jacob L.
2001Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden: Blackwell PublishersGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2014 “Stancetaking Strategies in Judicial Discourse: Evidence from US Supreme Court Opinions.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 131: 91–120.Google Scholar
The Law Reform Commission
(2003) Consultation Paper on Public Inquiries including Tribunals of Inquiry. Dublin: The Law Reform Commission.Google Scholar
Unuabonah, Foluke
2011 “Event Models: A Socio-Cognitive Study of Selected Interrogations in 2008 Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Administration In Nigeria.” Studies in Literature and Language 3 (1): 37–44.Google Scholar
2012a “The Generic Structure of Presentations in Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings on the FCT Administration in Nigeria in 2008.” California Linguistic Notes 37 (2): 1–23.Google Scholar
2012bInteraction Structure and Pragmatic Features in 2008 National Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory Administration in Nigeria. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
2016 “Contextual Beliefs in a Nigerian Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing”. Journal of Asian and African studies 5 (5): 619-633. Crossref.Google Scholar
2017 “ ‘Are you saying?’ Metapragmatic comments in Nigerian quasi-judicial public hearings”. Pragmatics 27 (1): 115-143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “The Generic Structure of a Public Hearing.” In Essays on Language, Communication and Literature in Africa, ed. by Akin Odebunmi and Joyce Mathangwane, 105–130. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Verdoolaege, Annelies
2009a “The Audience as Actor: The Participation Status of the Audience at the Victim Hearings of the South African TRC”. Discourse Studies, 11(4): 441–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b “Dealing with a Traumatic Past: The Victim Hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their Reconciliation Discourse”. Critical Discourse Studies 6(4): 297–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
2011 “Appraisal.” In Discursive Pragmatics ed. by Jan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren, 14–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke
2020. Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.