But as a stance marker in Nigerian investigative public hearings
This study examines the kinds of stance that
but as a contrastive marker signals in Nigerian investigative public hearings, with a view to exploring the contexts in which the stances are made. The study examines forty purposively selected investigative public hearing sessions which involve interactions between complainants, defendants and a hearing panel. The data are analysed qualitatively utilising
Du Bois’ (2007) interactional view of stance and
Martin and White’s (2005) Appraisal system. Results indicate that
but signals epistemic, evidential, emotive and evaluative stances within the narrative, interrogative and closing contexts. These stances and their contextual patterns depend heavily on the roles, goals and knowledge of the participants as stancetakers who position themselves, and align with other participants and the wider discourse community in order to express evaluation and intersubjective positioning.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A brief background to the Nigerian federal capital territory (FCT) administration hearings
- 3.Theoretical considerations
- 4.Method
- 5.Analysis and findings
- 5.1The discursive context of but in the hearings
- 5.1.1Narrative context
- 5.1.2Interrogative context
- 5.1.3Closing context
- 5.2But and stance
- 5.2.1
But signalling epistemic stance
- 5.2.2
But and evidential stance
- 5.2.3
But signalling evaluative stance
- 5.2.4
But indexing affective stance
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
References (43)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 

Aull, L. Laura, and Zak Lancaster. 2014. “Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writings: A corpus-based comparison.” Written Communication 32(2):151–183. 

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination (translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Baratta, Alexander M. 2009. “Revealing Stance through Passive Voice.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1406–1421. 

Berlin, Lawrence N. 2008. “‘I Think, Therefore …’ Commitment in Political Testimony.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27 (4): 372–383. 

Bernard, Taryn. 2009. Justificatory Discourse of the Perpetrator in TRC Testimonies: A discourse-historical Analysis. Unpublished MA Thesis. Stellenbosch University.
Biber, Douglas. 2006. “Stance in Spoken and Written University Registers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51: 97–116. 

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Bock, Zanni. 2007. A Discourse Analysis of Selected Truth and Reconciliation Commission Testimonies: Appraisal and Genre. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of the Western Cape.
Bock, Zanni. 2008. “‘Language has a heart’: Linguistic markers of evaluation in selected TRC testimonies.” Language of Multicultural Discourses 3(3):189–203. 

Bock, Zanni, Ngwanya Mazwi, Sifundo Metula, and Nosisi Mpolweni-Zantsi. 2006. “An Analysis of What Has Been ‘Lost’ in the Interpretation and Transcription Process of Selected TRC Testimonies.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 331:1–26.
Cavalieri, Silvia. 2009. “Reformulation and Conflict in the Witness Examination: The case of Public Inquiries.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 22 (2): 209–221. 

Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, & Danae Paolino. 1993. “Outline of discourse transcription.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research ed. by Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fraser, Bruce. 2006. “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by K. Fischer, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fraser, Bruce. 2009. “An Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of Pragmatics 11: 293–320. 

Fraser, Bruce. 2011. “The Sequencing of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.” Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 11: 29–35
Fraser, Bruce. 2013. “Combinations of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.” International Review of Pragmatics 51: 318–340. 

Fraser, Bruce. 2015. “The Combining of Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 48–53, 

Gray, Bethany and Douglas Biber. 2015. “Stance Markers.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann, 219–248 

Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. 

Keisanen, Tina and Elise Kärkkäinen 2014. “Stance.” In Pragmatics of Discourse, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Baron, 295–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 

Martin, J. R. & Peter White. 2005. the Language age of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Mei, S. Wu. 2006. “Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical Stance: Investigating the Strategy of Problemitisation in Students’ Argumentation.” RELC 37 (3): 329–353. 

Meinig, Bob. 1998. Public Hearings: When and How to Hold Them. MRSC Publications. Retrieved June 2, 2008 from [URL]
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishers
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Szczyrbak, Magdalena. 2014. “Stancetaking Strategies in Judicial Discourse: Evidence from US Supreme Court Opinions.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 1311: 91–120.
The Law Reform Commission (2003). Consultation Paper on Public Inquiries including Tribunals of Inquiry. Dublin: The Law Reform Commission.
Unuabonah, Foluke. 2011. “Event Models: A Socio-Cognitive Study of Selected Interrogations in 2008 Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Administration In Nigeria.” Studies in Literature and Language 3 (1): 37–44.
Unuabonah, Foluke. 2012a. “The Generic Structure of Presentations in Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings on the FCT Administration in Nigeria in 2008.” California Linguistic Notes 37 (2): 1–23.
Unuabonah, Foluke. 2012b. Interaction Structure and Pragmatic Features in 2008 National Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory Administration in Nigeria. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Ibadan.
Unuabonah, Foluke. 2016. “Contextual Beliefs in a Nigerian Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing”. Journal of Asian and African studies 5 (5): 619-633.
.
Unuabonah, Foluke. 2015. “The Generic Structure of a Public Hearing.” In Essays on Language, Communication and Literature in Africa, ed. by Akin Odebunmi and Joyce Mathangwane, 105–130. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Verdoolaege, Annelies. 2009a. “The Audience as Actor: The Participation Status of the Audience at the Victim Hearings of the South African TRC”. Discourse Studies, 11(4): 441–463. 

Verdoolaege, Annelies. 2009b. “Dealing with a Traumatic Past: The Victim Hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their Reconciliation Discourse”. Critical Discourse Studies 6(4): 297–309. 

White, Peter R. R. 2011. “Appraisal.” In Discursive Pragmatics ed. by Jan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren, 14–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Cai, Siying, Wenzhong Zhu & Yuting Wang
2023.
Corpus analysis of evaluative language and framework implementation for pharmaceutical industryCSRreports.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30:4
► pp. 2037 ff.

Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke
Unuabonah, Foluke O.
2018.
Direct quotations in Nigerian investigative public hearings
.
Text & Talk 38:4
► pp. 503 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.