But as a stance marker in Nigerian investigative public hearings
This study examines the kinds of stance that but as a contrastive marker signals in Nigerian investigative public hearings, with a view to exploring the contexts in which the stances are made. The study examines forty purposively selected investigative public hearing sessions which involve interactions between complainants, defendants and a hearing panel. The data are analysed qualitatively utilising Du Bois’ (2007) interactional view of stance and Martin and White’s (2005) Appraisal system. Results indicate that but signals epistemic, evidential, emotive and evaluative stances within the narrative, interrogative and closing contexts. These stances and their contextual patterns depend heavily on the roles, goals and knowledge of the participants as stancetakers who position themselves, and align with other participants and the wider discourse community in order to express evaluation and intersubjective positioning.
- 2.A brief background to the Nigerian federal capital territory (FCT) administration hearings
- 3.Theoretical considerations
- 5.Analysis and findings
- 5.1The discursive context of but in the hearings
- 5.1.1Narrative context
- 5.1.2Interrogative context
- 5.1.3Closing context
- 5.2But and stance
But signalling epistemic stance
But and evidential stance
But signalling evaluative stance
But indexing affective stance
2013 Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach
. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Aull, L. Laura, and Zak Lancaster
“Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writings: A corpus-based comparison
.” Written Communication
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981 The Dialogic Imagination
(translated by C. Emerson
& M. Holquist
). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Baratta, Alexander M.
“Revealing Stance through Passive Voice
.” Journal of Pragmatics
“ ‘I Think, Therefore …’ Commitment in Political Testimony
.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology
27 (4): 372–383.
2009 Justificatory Discourse of the Perpetrator in TRC Testimonies: A discourse-historical Analysis
. Unpublished MA Thesis. Stellenbosch University.
“Stance in Spoken and Written University Registers
.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
2007 A Discourse Analysis of Selected Truth and Reconciliation Commission Testimonies: Appraisal and Genre
. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of the Western Cape.
“ ‘Language has a heart’: Linguistic markers of evaluation in selected TRC testimonies
.” Language of Multicultural Discourses
Bock, Zanni, Ngwanya Mazwi, Sifundo Metula, and Nosisi Mpolweni-Zantsi
“An Analysis of What Has Been ‘Lost’ in the Interpretation and Transcription Process of Selected TRC Testimonies
.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS
“Reformulation and Conflict in the Witness Examination: The case of Public Inquiries
.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law
22 (2): 209–221.
Du Bois, John W.
“The Stance Triangle
.” In Stancetaking in Discourse
, ed. by Robert Englebretson
, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, & Danae Paolino
“Outline of discourse transcription
.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research
ed. by Jane A. Edwards
& Martin D. Lampert
, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
“Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers
.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles
, ed. by K. Fischer
, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
“An Account of Discourse Markers
.” International Review of Pragmatics
“The Sequencing of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English
.” Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture
“Combinations of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English
.” International Review of Pragmatics
“The Combining of Discourse Markers
.” Journal of Pragmatics
Gray, Bethany and Douglas Biber
.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook
, ed. by Karin Aijmer
and Christoph Rühlemann
“Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse
.” Discourse Studies
7 (2): 173–192.
Keisanen, Tina and Elise Kärkkäinen
.” In Pragmatics of Discourse
, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider
and Anne Baron
, 295–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,
Martin, J. R. & Peter White
2005 the Language age of Evaluation: Appraisal in English
. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mei, S. Wu
“Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical Stance: Investigating the Strategy of Problemitisation in Students’ Argumentation
37 (3): 329–353.
1998 Public Hearings: When and How to Hold Them
. MRSC Publications. Retrieved June 2, 2008 from [URL]
Mey, Jacob L.
2001 Pragmatics: An Introduction
. Malden: Blackwell Publishers
1987 Discourse Markers
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
“Stancetaking Strategies in Judicial Discourse: Evidence from US Supreme Court Opinions
.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis
The Law Reform Commission
) Consultation Paper on Public Inquiries including Tribunals of Inquiry
. Dublin: The Law Reform Commission.
“Event Models: A Socio-Cognitive Study of Selected Interrogations in 2008 Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Administration In Nigeria
.” Studies in Literature and Language
3 (1): 37–44.
“The Generic Structure of Presentations in Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings on the FCT Administration in Nigeria in 2008
.” California Linguistic Notes
37 (2): 1–23.
2012b Interaction Structure and Pragmatic Features in 2008 National Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory Administration in Nigeria
. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Ibadan.
“Contextual Beliefs in a Nigerian Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing
”. Journal of Asian and African studies
5 (5): 619-633.
“The Generic Structure of a Public Hearing
.” In Essays on Language, Communication and Literature in Africa
, ed. by Akin Odebunmi
and Joyce Mathangwane
, 105–130. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
“The Audience as Actor: The Participation Status of the Audience at the Victim Hearings of the South African TRC
”. Discourse Studies
, 11(4): 441–463.
“Dealing with a Traumatic Past: The Victim Hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their Reconciliation Discourse
”. Critical Discourse Studies
White, Peter R. R.
.” In Discursive Pragmatics
ed. by Jan Zienkowski
, Jan-Ola Östman
and Jef Verschueren
, 14–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by 2 other publications
Cai, Siying, Wenzhong Zhu & Yuting Wang
. Corpus analysis of evaluative language and framework implementation for pharmaceutical industry CSR reports
. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
pp. 2037 ff.
Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.