Regular articles
Emotions in motion
Towards a corpus-based description of the diachronic evolution of anger words
This paper outlines some of the challenges and possibilities of a corpus-based approach to the diachronic description of the semantics of emotion words. It analyses three German anger words (Wut, Zorn and Ärger) in two corpora: DTA (Deutsches Textarchiv, covering the period 1600–1899) and DWDS (Digitales Wörterbuch der Deutschen Sprache, which covers twentieth-century German). The study is based on two complementary approaches: a semantic and pragmatic analysis of co-occurrences (Oster, 2012); and the use of semantic foci (Ogarkova & Soriano, 2014). This allows for a detailed description of the semantic evolution of the three anger words for four aspects of emotion – Control, Lack of Control, Visibility and Internalization – while exploring the advantages of a combined quantitative and qualitative corpus analysis.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Results quantification and data interpretation in diachronic corpus studies
- 2.1Quantification and visualization of results
- 2.2Data interpretation
- 3.Object of study: The German anger words Wut, Zorn and Ärger
- 4.Method and resources
- 4.1Step 1: Tracing the regulation and expression of Wut, Zorn and Ärger
- 4.2Step 2: A quantitative diachronic analysis of Wut, Zorn and Ärger (1700–2000)
- 4.3Step 3: A qualitative case study
- 5.Framework: Tracing the regulation and expression of Wut, Zorn and Ärger
- 5.1Classification of co-occurrences according to the semantic foci
- 5.1.1Regulation: Control
- 5.1.2Regulation: Lack of Control
- 5.1.3Expression: Visibility
- 5.1.4Expression: Internalization
- 5.2Characterization of Wut, Zorn and Ärger in terms of Regulation and Expression
- 5.3Productivity and creative use of the four semantic foci
- 6.Quantitative study: A diachronic analysis of Wut, Zorn and Ärger
- 6.1Incidence of Wut, Zorn and Ärger from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries
- 6.2Evolution of the presence of the semantic foci
- 7.Qualitative study: Exploring the background to the changes
- 7.1Data-driven periodization
- 7.2Qualitative contrast between selected time segments
- 7.2.1Procedure
- 7.2.2Results
- 7.2.2.1Question a
- 7.2.2.2Question b
- 7.2.2.3Question c
- 8.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References
References
Allan, K.
(
2008)
Metaphor and metonymy: A diachronic approach. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Díaz-Vera, J. E.
(
2013)
Embodied emotions in medieval English language and visual arts. In
R. Caballero &
J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.),
Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 195–220). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diller, H. J.
(
1994)
Emotions in the English lexicon: A historical study of a lexical field. In
F. Fernández,
M. Fuster, &
J. J. Calvo (Eds.),
English Historical Linguistics 1992 (pp. 219–234). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durst, U.
(
2001)
Why Germans don’t feel “anger”. In
J. Harkins &
A. Wierzbicka (Eds.),
Emotions in crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 115–148). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enrique-Arias, A.
(
2012)
Dos problemas en el uso de corpus diacrónicos del español: perspectiva y comparabilidad.
Scriptum Digital, 11, 85–196.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fabiszak, M., & Hebda, A.
(
2010)
Cognitive historical approaches to emotions: Pride. In
M. E. Winters,
H. Tissari, &
K. Allan (Eds.),
Historical Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 261–297). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fries, N.
(
2004)
Gefühle, Emotionen, Angst, Furcht, Wut und Zorn. In
W. Börner &
K. Vogel (Eds.),
Emotion und Kognition im Fremdsprachenunterricht (pp. 3–24). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D.
(
2010)
Prospects for the past: Perspectives for cognitive diachronic semantics. In
M. E. Winters,
H. Tissari, &
K. Allan (Eds.),
Historical Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 333–356). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D.
(
2015)
Four guidelines for diachronic metaphor research. In
J. E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.),
Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language (pp. 15–30). Berlin/Munich/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D., Gevaert, C., & Speelman, D.
(
2012)
How anger rose: Hypothesis testing in diachronic semantics. In
K. Allan &
J. A. Robinson (Eds.),
Current methods in Historical Semantics (pp. 109–132). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S.
(
1995)
Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In
J. R. Taylor &
R. E. MacLaury (Eds.),
Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 153–179). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gevaert, C.
(
2001)
Anger in Old and Middle English: A “hot” topic? Belgian Essays on Language and Literature, 20011, 89–101.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gevaert, C.
(
2005)
The anger is heat question: Detecting cultural influence on the conceptualization of anger through diachronic corpus analysis. In
N. Delbecque,
J. van der Auwera, &
D. Geeraerts (Eds.),
Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative (pp. 195–208). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geyken, A., Boenig, M., Haaf, S., Jurish, B., Thomas, C., Wiegand, F., & Würzner, K. -M.
(
2015)
Zeitliche Verlaufskurven in den DTA- und DWDS-Korpora: Wörter und Wortverbindungen über 400 Jahre (1600–2000). Conference at
Jahrestagung DHd 2015: Von Daten zu Erkenntnissen: Digitale Geisteswissenschaften als Mittler zwischen Information und Interpretation
, February 23 to 27, Graz.
[URL] [last accessed on 23.06.2017]
Glynn, D.
(
2015)
The conceptual profile of the lexeme home. A multifactorial diachronic analysis. In
J. E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.),
Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language (pp. 265–294). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glynn, D., & Robinson, J. A.
Gries, S., & Hilpert, M.
(
2008)
The identification of stages in diachronic data: Variability-based neighbor clustering.
Corpora, 3(1), 59–81.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S. T., & Hilpert, M.
(
2012)
Variability-based neighbor clustering: A bottom-up approach to periodization in historical linguistics. In
T. Nevalainen &
E. C. Traugott (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of the history of English (pp. 134–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimm, J., & Grimm, W.
(
1838–1961)
Deutsches Wörterbuch. Leipzig: Online version.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haaf, S., & Thomas, C.
(
2016)
Die historischen Korpora des Deutschen Textarchivs als Grundlage für Sprachgeschichtliche Forschungen. In
H. Runow,
V. Harm, &
L. Schiwek (Eds.),
Sprachgeschichte des Deutschen: Positionierungen in Forschung, Studium, Schule. Stuttgart: Hirzel.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M., & Cuyckens, H.
(
2016)
How do corpus-based techniques advance description and theory in English historical linguistics?: An introduction to the special issue.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 12(1), 1–5.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M., & Gries, S.
(
2016)
Quantitative approaches to diachronic corpus linguistics. In
M. Kytö &
P. Pahta (Eds.),
The Cambridge handbook of English Historical Linguistics (pp. 19–35). City: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(
1987)
The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In
D. C. Holland &
N. Quinn (Eds.),
Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lijffijt, J., Säily, T., & Nevalainen, T.
(
2012)
CEECing the baseline: Lexical stability and significant change in a historical corpus.
Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, 101.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mischler, J. J.
(
2008)
A Time for anger: Conceptions of human feeling in Modern English, A. D. 1500–1900. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oesterheld, C.
(
2016)
Changing landscapes of love and passion in the Urdu novel.
Contributions to the History of Concepts, 11(1), 58–80.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ogarkova, A., & Soriano, C.
(
2014)
Variation within universals: The “metaphorical profile” approach to the study of anger concepts in English, Russian and Spanish. In
A. Musolff,
F. MacArthur, &
G. Pagani (Eds.),
About metaphor and intercultural communication (pp. 93–116). London: Bloomsbury.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ogarkova, A., Soriano, C. & Lehr, C.
(
2012)
Naming feeling: exploring the equivalence of emotion terms in five European languages. In
P. Wilson (Ed.),
Dynamicity in emotion concepts (pp. 3–35). Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oster, U.
(
2010)
Using corpus methodology for semantic and pragmatic analyses: What can corpora tell us about the linguistic expression of emotions? Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 727–763.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oster, U.
(
2012)
“Angst” and “fear” in contrast: A corpus-based analysis of emotion concepts. In
M. Brdar,
I. Raffaell, &
M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.),
Cognitive Linguistics between universality and variation (pp. 327–355). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oster, U.
(
2014)
Emotions between physicality and acceptability: A contrast of the German anger words Wut and Zorn
.
Onomázein, 301, 286–306.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oster, U.
submitted).
Cross-cultural semantic and pragmatic profiling of emotion words. Regulation and expression of anger in Spanish and German. In
I. Navarro Ed.
Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse Berlin/Boston de Gruyter Mouton
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Pagán Cánovas, C.
(
2011)
The genesis of the arrows of love: Diachronic conceptual integration in Greek mythology.
American Journal of Philology, 132(4), 553–579.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pagán Cánovas, C.
(
2014)
Cognitive patterns in Greek poetic metaphors of emotion: A diachronic approach. In
J. Díaz-Vera (Ed.),
Metaphor and metonymy through time and cultures (pp. 295–318). Berlin/Munich/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soriano, C., Fontaine, J., Ogarkova, A., Quijano, C. M., Volkova, Y., Ionova, S., and Shakhovskyy, V.
(
2013)
Types of anger in Spanish and Russian. In
J. J. R. Fontaine,
K. R. Scherer, &
C. Soriano (Eds.),
Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 339–352). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tissari, H.
(
2001)
Affection, friendship, passion and charity: A history of four “love lexemes” since the fifteenth century.
Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 102(1), 49–76.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tissari, H.
(
2006a)
Conceptualizing shame: Investigating uses of the English word shame, 1418–1991. In
R. W. McConchie,
O. Timofeeva,
H. Tissari, &
T. Säily (Eds.),
Selected proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX) (pp. 143–154). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tissari, H.
(
2006b)
Justified PRIDE?: Metaphors of the word pride in English language corpora, 1418–1991.
Nordic Journal of English Studies, 5(1), 15–49.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trim, R.
(
2007)
Metaphor networks: The comparative evolution of figurative language. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trim, R.
(
2010)
Conceptual networking theory in metaphor evolution: Diachronic variation in models of love. In
M. E. Winters,
H. Tissari, &
K. Allan (Eds.),
Historical Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 223–260). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, W., Geeraerts, D., & Speelman, D.
(
2015)
Visualizing onomasiological change: Diachronic variation in metonymic patterns for woman in Chinese.
Cognitive Linguistics, 26(2), 289–330.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Rajeg, Gede Primahadi Wijaya & I Made Rajeg
Wu, Shuqiong & Dilin Liu
2023.
Exploring metaphorical conceptualizations of ENVY in English and Chinese: A multifactorial corpus analysis.
Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.