Cover not available
Article published In:
Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication
Edited by Wei-lun Lu, Naděžda Kudrnáčová and Laura A. Janda
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1] 2019
► pp. 53–77
Special issue articles

Contrastive semantics of human locomotion verbs

English walk vs. Czech jít and kráčet

| Masaryk University
This paper is a contribution to a hitherto unexplored area in English-Czech contrastive semantics. It examines differences in the construal of walking, the most prototypical type of human locomotion. Based on the data from InterCorp, a synchronic parallel translation corpus, it presents a cognitive oriented analysis of the semantics of English walk and its nearest Czech counterparts, i.e. jít and kráčet. Despite their apparent commonalities, the verbs in question do not construe walking in the same way. In contrast to jít, the construal of a motion situation in walk and kráčet involves focus on leg movements and bodily position, amounting to a marked segmentation of the motion into individual quanta. Focus on leg movements and verticality of the body is even more pronounced in kráčet, which can then serve an evaluative function; such a possibility is not open for walk. Walk thus occupies an intermediate position between the two verbs.
Keywords: contrastive semantics, parallel translation corpus, verbs of human locomotion, quantization of motion
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data, method, and research question
  • 3.A brief survey of the descriptions of walk in the literature
  • 4.Quantization of motion in walk, jít and kráčet: A preliminary account
  • 5.Speed in relation to the character of the quantization of motion
  • 6.Bodily posture
  • 7.Directionality of path
    • 7.1Prepositional path phrases
      • 7.1.1Relative suppression of directionality in in- and on-path phrases
    • 7.2Prepositionless path phrases
  • 8.The human actor’s experiential self in kráčet
  • 9. Kráčet used as an evaluative verb
  • 10.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00026.kud
References (48)
References
Akita, K. (2017). The typology of manner expressions: A preliminary look. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications (pp. 39–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, B., & Granger, S. (2002). Recent trends in cross-linguistic lexical studies. In B. Altenberg & S. Granger (Eds.), Lexis in contrast: Corpus-based approaches (pp. 3–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C. (2008). Towards a frame-constructional approach to verb classification. In E. S. Acevedo & F. J. C. Rodríguez (Eds.), Grammar, constructions, and interfaces. Special issue of Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 571, 17–47.Google Scholar
Charras, P., & Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Length perception of horizontal and vertical bisected lines. Psychological Research, 74(2), 196–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W. (1999). Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar (pp. 201–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, P. B., & Mairal Usón, R. (1999). Constructing a lexicon of English verbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, C., Wierzbicka, A., & Wong, J. (2016). “Walking” and “running” in English and German: The conceptual semantics of verbs of human locomotion. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 14(2), 303–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horecký, J. (1999). Sémantické a derivačné pole slovies ísť a chodiť [Semantic and derivative fields of the verbs ísť and chodiť ]. Slovenská reč, 64(4), 202–208.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Parts and boundaries. Cognition, 41(1–3), 9–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R., & Landau, B. (1992). Spatial language and spatial cognition. In R. Jackendoff (Ed.), Languages of the mind: Essays on mental representation (pp. 99–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. (2006). Totally normal chaos: The aspectual behavior of Russian motion verbs. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 28(1–4), 183–193.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kudrnáčová, N. (2013). Caused motion: Secondary agent constructions. Brno: Masaryk University.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Machek, V. (2010). Etymologický slovník jazyka českého [An etymological dictionary of the Czech language]. Prague: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Maki, B. E., & McIlroy, W. E. (1997). The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: The “change-in-support” strategy. Physical Therapy, 77(5), 488–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, B. C., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Ameel, E., Tsuda, N., & Majid, A. (2008). Talking about walking: Biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science, 19(3), 232–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, B. C., Gennari, S., & Imai, M. (2010). Lexicalization patterns and the world-to-words mapping. In B. C. Malt & P. Wolff (Eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience (pp. 29–57). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, B. C., Ameel, E., Imai, M., Gennari, S. P., Saji, N., & Majid, A. (2014). Human locomotion in languages: Constraints on moving and meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 741, 107–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinková, M. (2014). K metodologii využití paralelních korpusů v kontrastivní lingvistice [On the methodology of using parallel corpora in contrastive linguistic research]. Naše řeč, 97(4–5), 270–285.Google Scholar
Miller, G., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesset, T. (2010). Metaphorical walking: Russian idti as a generalized motion verb. In V. Hasko & R. Perelmutter (Eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion (pp. 343–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nida, E. A. (1975). Componential analysis of meaning: An introduction to semantic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Phelps, K., & Duman, S. (2012). Manipulating manner: Semantic representations of human locomotion verbs in English and German. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 341, 857–862.Google Scholar
Piñón, C. J. (1993). Paths and their names. In K. Beals, G. Cooke, D. Kathman, S. Kita, K. McCullough & D. Testen (Eds.), Papers from the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 287–303). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V. (2004). There and back: the case of Russsian ‘go’. Glossos, 51, 1–33. [[URL]]
Rojo, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Cognitive linguistics and translation studies: Past, present and future. In A. Rojo & I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and translation: Advances in some theoretical models and applications (pp. 3–30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saicová Římalová, L. (2010). Vybraná slovesa pohybu v češtině: Studie z kognitivní lingvistiky [Selected verbs of motion in Czech: A study in cognitive linguistics]. Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2012). Fundamental and inherently interrelated aspects of animation. In A. Foolen, U. M. Lüdtke, T. P. Racine & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp. 29–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1997). Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Relating narrative events in translation. In D. D. Ravid & H. B. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (pp. 115–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A. (2014). Manners of human gait: A cross-linguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 701–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slovník spisovné češtiny pro školu a veřejnost [A dictionary of standard Czech for school and home]. (2009). Eds. J. Filipec, F. Daneš, J. Machač & V. Mejstřík. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Slovník spisovného jazyka českého [A dictionary of standard Czech]. (1960). Eds. B. Havránek, J. Bělič, M. Helcl, A. Jedlička, V. Křístek & F. Trávníček. Prague: Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd.Google Scholar
Snell-Hornby, M. (1983). Verb-descriptivity in German and English: A contrastive study in semantic fields. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Towards a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vidaković, I. (2012). ‘He walked up the pole with arms and legs’: Typology in second language acquisition. In L. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures (pp. 233–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vulchanova, M., & Martinez, L. (2013). A basic level for the encoding of biological motion. In C. Paradis, J. Hudson & U. Magnusson (Eds.), The construal of spatial meaning: Windows into conceptual space (pp. 144–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wienold, G. (1995). Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: With reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. In U. Egli, P. E. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. von Stechow & G. Wienold (Eds.), Lexical knowledge in the organization of language (pp. 301–340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1988). The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar